"In 2000, the tribes were granted permission to erect casinos in California, thanks to voters driven in large part by guilt over historic treatment of Indians. The tribes began reaping vast profits and now rival Las Vegas for income. A monthly income of $30,000 for every man, woman and child in a gaming tribe is no longer big news.
But the once-popular tribes earned the enmity of California voters by getting greedy. They squabbled to eject members from tribes so the remaining members wouldn't have to share. Battles erupted over bloodlines; some families dug up grandma to provide ancestral DNA.
Worse, the tribes abandoned their campaign promise of casinos only on 'Indian land.' Today, 'Indian land' is any land the staggeringly rich gaming tribes can buy with acquiescence from politicians."
Get the Story:
Jill Stewart: It's time for Arnold to change his tune
(The Long Beach Press-Telegram 10/2)
Opinion
Opinion: California gaming tribes got greedy
Monday, October 3, 2005 More from this date
Opinion: California gaming tribes got greedy
Monday, October 3, 2005 More from this date
Join the Conversation
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Indian Gaming Stories
Trending in Gaming
1 Catawba Nation continues work on controversial casino in North Carolina
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
More Stories
Navajo Nation president touts gaming as benefit Gaming a boon for Oneida Nation, local community
Indian Gaming Archive