"The most defensible reason for the state to get into the casino act now is not to plug a hole in the state budget, or to enrich private interests, which Canterbury's racino proposal has great potential to do. It is to pull a larger share of Minnesota's Indian population into the middle class. Casinos have indeed made a small Indian minority wealthy. But the vast majority of Minnesota's native people, particularly the Ojibwe of the Red Lake, White Earth and Leech Lake bands, are too far removed from large markets for their casinos to flourish. They need state involvement if gambling's economic engine is to work for them.
Authorizing a Canterbury racino without tribal involvement would move casino gaming out of Indian hands for the first time in the modern era. It likely wouldn't be the last time."
Get the Story:
Editorial: One's enough/Try for a tribal racino
(The Minneapolis Star Tribune 3/11)
pwlat
Opinion
Editorial: Joint tribal-state racino a better idea
Friday, March 11, 2005 More from this date
Editorial: Joint tribal-state racino a better idea
Friday, March 11, 2005 More from this date
Join the Conversation
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Indian Gaming Stories
Trending in Gaming
1 Catawba Nation continues work on controversial casino in North Carolina
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
More Stories
State to investigate off-reservation casinos Opinion: Exceptions the rule in Indian gaming
Indian Gaming Archive