"By now, nearly every Minnesotan is probably aware of Gov. Tim Pawlenty's plans to raise additional state revenue through either new revenue-sharing with existing Native American casinos or a partnership with the less fortunate tribes of our state.
As House speaker, I support the governor's plan because the current gaming situation in Minnesota is a monopoly -- that goes on forever -- and pays no tax. It is unfair to Minnesota, to taxpayers and to the great majority of the Native American population in Minnesota.
While both sides of the issue make valid points, the underlying fact doesn't change: the current status quo of casino gaming in Minnesota simply isn't fair. Minnesota has the nation's third-largest tribal casino industry, and yet we have the worst compact deal in the nation."
Get the Story:
Steve Sviggum: Casino status quo isn't fair to state
(The Minneapolis Star Tribune 2/6)
pwlat
Opinion
Opinion: Minnesota tribes should share revenues
Monday, February 7, 2005 More from this date
Opinion: Minnesota tribes should share revenues
Monday, February 7, 2005 More from this date
Join the Conversation
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Indian Gaming Stories
Trending in Gaming
1 Catawba Nation continues work on controversial casino in North Carolina
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
More Stories
Gov. Bush not ready to talk gaming with tribe Oklahoma tribe offered card game without approval
Indian Gaming Archive