"Although California is experiencing a budgetary crisis, the state's fiscal answers do not lie in mandating the potential revenue from taxing Indian casinos on their gambling income.
Expansions of these casinos would ultimately result in more traffic congestion, pollution and sewage problems, so important considerations in the environmental impact reports must be made. Local governments would lose the majority of control in negotiating with Indian tribes if Proposition 70 passes.
The governor's compact with the California Indian tribes should remain unaltered until a fairer modification is created."
Get the Story:
Editorial: No on Prop. 70
(The California Aggie 10/28)
California
Editorial: Vote no on tribe's gaming initiative
Thursday, October 28, 2004 More from this date
Editorial: Vote no on tribe's gaming initiative
Thursday, October 28, 2004 More from this date
Join the Conversation
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Indian Gaming Stories
Trending in Gaming
1 Catawba Nation continues work on controversial casino in North Carolina
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
More Stories
NIGA asks Schwarzenegger to apologize for remarks Only two tribal leaders meet Minnesota governor
Indian Gaming Archive