"We proposed a gaming agreement resulting in an additional $1 billion to the state that was rejected by the governor's negotiators. We requested meetings with the governor directly and were told he was not available. It is the governor who has refused to take a meeting and negotiate, not the tribes..
The reason why the governor turned down this $1-billion deal � as his negotiator told us � is because it wasn't enough money to eliminate the debt. Thus the governor is attempting to extract 25% of our gaming revenue. I consider that greedy. This raises the question: Has the state ever paid tribes their "fair share"? And has the state ever "revenue-shared" with tribes? The answers are no, and to expect tribes to do so is greedy."
Get the Story:
Deron Marquez: Governor Isn't Playing Fair on Indian Casinos
(The Los Angeles Times 10/16)
pwlat
California
San Manuel Chairman: Arnold not playing fair
Monday, October 18, 2004 More from this date
San Manuel Chairman: Arnold not playing fair
Monday, October 18, 2004 More from this date
Join the Conversation
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Indian Gaming Stories
Trending in Gaming
1 Catawba Nation continues work on controversial casino in North Carolina
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
More Stories
Creek Nation council opposes state gaming question Nebraska tribes weigh expansion of gaming
Indian Gaming Archive