The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear a case challenging the legality of Indian gaming in California.
A group of non-Indian card clubs sued the state and the federal government for approving compacts with California tribes. They said the grant of exclusivity to tribes for slot machines violated the U.S. Constitution.
A federal judge disagreed and was upheld by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. The card clubs then sought review by the high court.
In a second part of the case, the card clubs are fighting a trust land acquisition in the Bay Area for the Lytton Band of Pomo Indians.
Get the Story:
Court rejects Indian gaming case
(The San Mateo County Times 10/5)
Court won't address Native gaming (AP 10/5)
Litigation
Supreme Court won't take California gaming case
Tuesday, October 5, 2004 More from this date
Supreme Court won't take California gaming case
Tuesday, October 5, 2004 More from this date
Join the Conversation
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Indian Gaming Stories
Trending in Gaming
1 Catawba Nation continues work on controversial casino in North Carolina
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
More Stories
Iowa Tribe has plans for urban casino in Kansas Schwarzenegger blasts others for taking tribal money
Indian Gaming Archive