"The Indian casinos have limited gambling appeal to tourists, and for that matter many citizens. They do not have table games other than blackjack. Our government can renegotiate the compacts so that the casinos gain additional appeal and revenue, and the state gets a fair financial return. Making the Indian casinos more attractive to in-state and out-of-state gamblers negates the importance of an operation such as the proposed Ceasars. The Indian casinos eventually could provide a similar return to the state. This return could be put to use for tourism, education, stadiums, etc."
Get the Story:
Tom Sutton: Casinos and the state can both be winners
(The Minneapolis Star Tribune 9/29)
pwlat
Opinion
Opinion: Revenue sharing can be good for tribes
Wednesday, September 29, 2004 More from this date
Opinion: Revenue sharing can be good for tribes
Wednesday, September 29, 2004 More from this date
Join the Conversation
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Indian Gaming Stories
Trending in Gaming
1 Catawba Nation continues work on controversial casino in North Carolina
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
More Stories
Two Washington tribes debut new gaming facilities Schwarzenegger attacks gaming initiatives
Indian Gaming Archive