FROM THE ARCHIVE
Court to review 'three strikes' policy
Facebook
Twitter
Email
TUESDAY, APRIL 2, 2002 The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to consider whether a "three strikes" tough-on-crime policy is unconstitutional. The Court accepted two cases that will test laws which have been passed in more than 20 states. States put offenders behind bars for long sentences after a third crime is committed. Separately, the Court, without explanation, decided not to rule in an age discrimination case it heard last month. The action marks the second time this term the Court has thrown out a case. Get the Story:
Justices Will Review Validity of 'Three Strikes' Law (The Washington Post 4/2)
Supreme Court Taps Cases to Decide 3-Strikes Issue (The New York Times 4/2)
Username: indianz.com, Password: indianz.com
Advertisement
Stay Connected
Contact
Search
Trending in News
1 White House Council on Native American Affairs meets quick demise under Donald Trump
2 'A process of reconnecting': Young Lakota actor finds ways to stay tied to tribal culture
3 Jenni Monet: Bureau of Indian Affairs officer on leave after fatal shooting of Brandon Laducer
4 'A disgraceful insult': Joe Biden campaign calls out Navajo leader for Republican speech
5 Kaiser Health News: Sisters from Navajo Nation died after helping coronavirus patients
2 'A process of reconnecting': Young Lakota actor finds ways to stay tied to tribal culture
3 Jenni Monet: Bureau of Indian Affairs officer on leave after fatal shooting of Brandon Laducer
4 'A disgraceful insult': Joe Biden campaign calls out Navajo leader for Republican speech
5 Kaiser Health News: Sisters from Navajo Nation died after helping coronavirus patients
News Archive
About This Page
You are enjoying stories from the Indianz.Com Archive, a collection dating back to 2000. Some outgoing links may no longer work due to age.
All stories are available for publishing via Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)