FROM THE ARCHIVE
BIA recognition staff fails pressure test
Facebook
Twitter
Email
FRIDAY, MAY 31, 2002 It has been said the Bureau of Indian Affairs acts only when a court or Congress directs them to do so. The staff which analyzes federal recognition petitions continues to prove the adage wrong. Confronted with lawsuits involving several tribes that have waited years for an answer that will pave the way to federal funding, health, education and other benefits, the dozen or so researchers are under the gun to complete their work in time. Despite the pressure, and repeated promises made to federal judges exasperated with the glacial pace, they have failed to make good on their word. The latest case affects two Connecticut tribes whose federal status has been pending for decades. They received a preliminary answer during the Clinton administration when then-Assistant Secretary Kevin Gover in March 2000 said they qualified for recognition. Since then, numerous deadlines have come and gone for the BIA to make a decision on the Eastern Pequot Tribe and the Paucatuck Eastern Pequot Tribe. To be sure, not all of the delays are the fault of the researchers responsible for the tribes -- the state of Connecticut shares the blame for putting up roadblocks. But the failure to follow through on time has a domino effect on others in the queue. Although final determinations are expected at the end of June, only three weeks behind schedule, tribes in Connecticut and Massachusetts are immediately impacted due to the BIA's limited resources. It also highlights the checkered history of the Bureau of Acknowledgment and Research (BAR), the staff assigned with sorting out the monumental task of who is Indian and who is not. Since BAR began work in 1978, it has processed just 32 petitions, extending recognition to 14. Meanwhile, dozens languish in the "ready" phase -- a misnomer because that means no one is working on the case. Hundreds more await the BIA when the ready list is exhausted. As for the Pequot tribes, there never was a court-ordered deadline to finalize the decisions, according to BIA spokesperson Nedra Darling. She placed emphasis on a "projected" date that was promised as recently as April to a federal judge in Connecticut. "We project we will not be able to meet the projected June 4 date," she said, referring to the BIA's original guesstimate. A declaration filed in federal court by R. Lee Fleming, the BAR director, is more telling. He cites numerous reasons for needing more time, including court intervention affecting the Wampanoag Mashpee Tribe of Massachusetts and the Schaghticoke Tribal Nation of Connecticut. But there are also resource limitations, Fleming pointed out. The two anthropologists and researchers working on the Pequot tribes must also work on other petitions, he said. A federal judge has ordered action on the Mashpee by June 21. Then there's the issue of coordination with of Assistant Secretary Neal McCaleb. Due to an extensive travel schedule, he'll only be in Washington, D.C., for eight business days this month before he is to sign off on the Pequot and Mashpee tribes. Fleming, however, said drafts of the final determinations are circulating within the BIA for "internal review." McCaleb is to be briefed when his schedule permits, the May 22 declaration stated. "This is a big workload for two final determinations," added Darling. Relevant Documents:
R. Lee Fleming Declaration (5/22) Related Stories:
Striking Out: 'I think you get the picture' (4/17)
BIA deputy recused on recognition (4/16)
Wall Street Journal blasted for 'drive by' (4/5)
GOP lobbyist scores big with tribes (4/3)
Getting there, McCaleb takes on recognition (3/15)
Inside the BIA, plenty of drama (3/4)
Ashcroft urged to charge BIA officials (3/1)
McCaleb affirms recognition of Cowlitz Tribe (1/3)
Solutions sought for 'hijacked' recognition (11/9)
Chinook recognition sent back to BIA (11/8)
Chinook recognition to be reconsidered (11/7)
Deadline nearing for Chinook Nation (11/5)
Gover: Recognition study 'cooked' (11/1)
Reforming federal recognition (10/26)
Gover takes on recognition (10/25)
Norton urged to uphold recognition (10/11)
Chinook Nation faces reversal (10/3)
McCaleb reverses Clinton recognitions (9/28)
Cowlitz recognition upheld by Interior (6/15)
McCaleb to listen 'closely' to recognition experts (8/9)
Muwekma Tribe denied recognition (7/31)
McCaleb decision sure to draw scrutiny (7/31)
BIA pushed to provide 'answers' on tribes (7/26)
McCaleb endorses BIA on recognition (6/14)
Gover's 'activist' legacy escapes McCaleb (6/13)
BIA has small goal for big problem (5/22)
Federal recognition battles continue (5/10)
Advertisement
Stay Connected
Contact
Search
Trending in News
1 White House Council on Native American Affairs meets quick demise under Donald Trump
2 'A process of reconnecting': Young Lakota actor finds ways to stay tied to tribal culture
3 Jenni Monet: Bureau of Indian Affairs officer on leave after fatal shooting of Brandon Laducer
4 'A disgraceful insult': Joe Biden campaign calls out Navajo leader for Republican speech
5 Kaiser Health News: Sisters from Navajo Nation died after helping coronavirus patients
2 'A process of reconnecting': Young Lakota actor finds ways to stay tied to tribal culture
3 Jenni Monet: Bureau of Indian Affairs officer on leave after fatal shooting of Brandon Laducer
4 'A disgraceful insult': Joe Biden campaign calls out Navajo leader for Republican speech
5 Kaiser Health News: Sisters from Navajo Nation died after helping coronavirus patients
News Archive
About This Page
You are enjoying stories from the Indianz.Com Archive, a collection dating back to 2000. Some outgoing links may no longer work due to age.
All stories are available for publishing via Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)