FROM THE ARCHIVE
MONDAY, JULY 30, 2001 By a vote of 218 to 189, the House on Friday voted to reinstate a stricter arsenic in drinking water standard which President Bush had wanted reviewed. The 10 parts per billion standard had been finalized during the last months of the Clinton administration. It was criticized by the industry and Republican lawmakers who said it was too costly and had no scientific merit. To assess the rule, the Environmental Protection Agency suspended the rule and began a review. The current standard is 50 ppb, set in 1942. Arsenic can cause bladder, lung and skin cancer, and may cause liver and kidney cancer, according to a 1999 study conducted by the National Academy of Sciences. The report, however, did not provide a formal risk assessment of arsenic in drinking water. Even if the Clinton standard is approved, it won't go into effect until 2006. Get the Story:
House Backs Arsenic Rule (The Washington Post 7/28) Related Stories:
EPA to conduct new arsenic study (4/19)
Pueblo battles arsenic in water standard (4/16)
Whitman didn't know mines produce arsenic (3/29)
Peabody Coal fought Bush's promise (3/26)
EPA promises strong arsenic standard (3/23)
EPA promises strong arsenic standard (3/23)
Environment: The GOP strikes back (3/21)
House rebuffs Bush on arsenic rules
Facebook TwitterMONDAY, JULY 30, 2001 By a vote of 218 to 189, the House on Friday voted to reinstate a stricter arsenic in drinking water standard which President Bush had wanted reviewed. The 10 parts per billion standard had been finalized during the last months of the Clinton administration. It was criticized by the industry and Republican lawmakers who said it was too costly and had no scientific merit. To assess the rule, the Environmental Protection Agency suspended the rule and began a review. The current standard is 50 ppb, set in 1942. Arsenic can cause bladder, lung and skin cancer, and may cause liver and kidney cancer, according to a 1999 study conducted by the National Academy of Sciences. The report, however, did not provide a formal risk assessment of arsenic in drinking water. Even if the Clinton standard is approved, it won't go into effect until 2006. Get the Story:
House Backs Arsenic Rule (The Washington Post 7/28) Related Stories:
EPA to conduct new arsenic study (4/19)
Pueblo battles arsenic in water standard (4/16)
Whitman didn't know mines produce arsenic (3/29)
Peabody Coal fought Bush's promise (3/26)
EPA promises strong arsenic standard (3/23)
EPA promises strong arsenic standard (3/23)
Environment: The GOP strikes back (3/21)
Search
Trending in News
1 White House Council on Native American Affairs meets quick demise under Donald Trump
2 'A process of reconnecting': Young Lakota actor finds ways to stay tied to tribal culture
3 Jenni Monet: Bureau of Indian Affairs officer on leave after fatal shooting of Brandon Laducer
4 'A disgraceful insult': Joe Biden campaign calls out Navajo leader for Republican speech
5 Kaiser Health News: Sisters from Navajo Nation died after helping coronavirus patients
2 'A process of reconnecting': Young Lakota actor finds ways to stay tied to tribal culture
3 Jenni Monet: Bureau of Indian Affairs officer on leave after fatal shooting of Brandon Laducer
4 'A disgraceful insult': Joe Biden campaign calls out Navajo leader for Republican speech
5 Kaiser Health News: Sisters from Navajo Nation died after helping coronavirus patients
News Archive
About This Page
You are enjoying stories from the Indianz.Com Archive, a collection dating back to 2000. Some outgoing links may no longer work due to age.
All stories are available for publishing via Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)