FROM THE ARCHIVE
AUGUST 15, 2000 In a letter addressed to the Connecticut state Congressional delegation, Assistant Secretary of Interior Kevin Gover says the Bureau of Indian Affairs didn't have to tell three towns of a cut-off date in submitting documentation about two Pequot tribes. Gover said the cut-off was justified because any documentation sent after the date will still be considered by the BIA when it makes a final determination on the federal recognition status of the Eastern Pequot and Paucatuck Eastern Pequot tribes. The issue was one of concern raised by the state last week during a two-day meeting discussing the tribes' petitions. Virginia DeMarce, a BIA researcher, told the state that she instituted the April 15, 1999, cut-off date due to the amount of documentation being sent by the towns of Ledyard, North Stonington, and Preston. "Enough is enough," said DeMarce on Tuesday. DeMarce said she had become "skeptical" of the information being sent by the towns, believing it was an effort to keep her from doing her job. She asked for the cut-off date in order to get back to work on the petition. When asked by representatives of the state why the towns were not told of the date, DeMarce said to chalk it up to "human incompetence." Regardless of the cut-off date, DeMarce also said the documentation sent by the towns as of that date was unreliable and unusable. Accusing the towns of shoddy research, she said they mispresented genealogical data of Eastern Pequot ancestors. DeMarce uncovered the error after checking up on the towns' research, she said. Nicholas Mullane, a town official, said the BIA has not used 60 percent of documentation they sent. DeMarce and George Roth, another researcher, said they will consider any evidence submitted after the date as part of the final determination for the two tribes. Relevant Links:
The Bureau of Indian Affairs - www.doi.gov/bureau-indian-affairs.html
Eastern Pequot Preliminary Recognition - www.doi.gov/bia/bar/epdx.htm
Paucatuck Eastern Pequot Preliminary Recognition - www.doi.gov/bia/bar/pepdx.htm Related Stories:
BIA meeting centers on history (8/7)
Will Lieberman attend BIA meeting? ( 8/7)
BIA: Towns not reliable (8/9)
BIA tells tribe, state where to go (8/10)
BIA 'bewildered' by state request (8/10)
BIA: No evidence tribe existed (8/10)
Tribe, towns, state pleased with meeting (8/10)
Gover writes state lawmakers
Facebook TwitterAUGUST 15, 2000 In a letter addressed to the Connecticut state Congressional delegation, Assistant Secretary of Interior Kevin Gover says the Bureau of Indian Affairs didn't have to tell three towns of a cut-off date in submitting documentation about two Pequot tribes. Gover said the cut-off was justified because any documentation sent after the date will still be considered by the BIA when it makes a final determination on the federal recognition status of the Eastern Pequot and Paucatuck Eastern Pequot tribes. The issue was one of concern raised by the state last week during a two-day meeting discussing the tribes' petitions. Virginia DeMarce, a BIA researcher, told the state that she instituted the April 15, 1999, cut-off date due to the amount of documentation being sent by the towns of Ledyard, North Stonington, and Preston. "Enough is enough," said DeMarce on Tuesday. DeMarce said she had become "skeptical" of the information being sent by the towns, believing it was an effort to keep her from doing her job. She asked for the cut-off date in order to get back to work on the petition. When asked by representatives of the state why the towns were not told of the date, DeMarce said to chalk it up to "human incompetence." Regardless of the cut-off date, DeMarce also said the documentation sent by the towns as of that date was unreliable and unusable. Accusing the towns of shoddy research, she said they mispresented genealogical data of Eastern Pequot ancestors. DeMarce uncovered the error after checking up on the towns' research, she said. Nicholas Mullane, a town official, said the BIA has not used 60 percent of documentation they sent. DeMarce and George Roth, another researcher, said they will consider any evidence submitted after the date as part of the final determination for the two tribes. Relevant Links:
The Bureau of Indian Affairs - www.doi.gov/bureau-indian-affairs.html
Eastern Pequot Preliminary Recognition - www.doi.gov/bia/bar/epdx.htm
Paucatuck Eastern Pequot Preliminary Recognition - www.doi.gov/bia/bar/pepdx.htm Related Stories:
BIA meeting centers on history (8/7)
Will Lieberman attend BIA meeting? ( 8/7)
BIA: Towns not reliable (8/9)
BIA tells tribe, state where to go (8/10)
BIA 'bewildered' by state request (8/10)
BIA: No evidence tribe existed (8/10)
Tribe, towns, state pleased with meeting (8/10)
Search
Trending in News
1 White House Council on Native American Affairs meets quick demise under Donald Trump
2 'A process of reconnecting': Young Lakota actor finds ways to stay tied to tribal culture
3 Jenni Monet: Bureau of Indian Affairs officer on leave after fatal shooting of Brandon Laducer
4 'A disgraceful insult': Joe Biden campaign calls out Navajo leader for Republican speech
5 Kaiser Health News: Sisters from Navajo Nation died after helping coronavirus patients
2 'A process of reconnecting': Young Lakota actor finds ways to stay tied to tribal culture
3 Jenni Monet: Bureau of Indian Affairs officer on leave after fatal shooting of Brandon Laducer
4 'A disgraceful insult': Joe Biden campaign calls out Navajo leader for Republican speech
5 Kaiser Health News: Sisters from Navajo Nation died after helping coronavirus patients
News Archive
About This Page
You are enjoying stories from the Indianz.Com Archive, a collection dating back to 2000. Some outgoing links may no longer work due to age.
All stories are available for publishing via Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)