Alex Skibine: Agreement doesn't solve Indian mascot problem

universityofutah.jpg
The University of Utah logo

Law professor Alex Skibine says agreement between University of Utah and the Ute Tribe doesn't address the problem of Indian mascots:
Two things are bothersome about this agreement. First, the university, as a state institution, should be doing what it promised in the agreement anyway, whether it uses the Ute name or not, and it should extend such services to all of Utah’s tribes.

Secondly, the use of Indian mascots is more a national issue than just a local one. The editorial stressed that there are differences between the U.’s use of the "Utes" and others such as the Washington Redskins. If there is any difference, it is a slight one that may amount to a distinction without a difference. The time has come for us as a country to move away from the use of Indian mascots, and this agreement does not move us in the right direction.

Get the Story:
Alex Skibine: Utes pact still disrespects (The Salt Lake Tribune 4/25)

Related Stories
Opinion: University must eventually eliminate Ute nickname (4/17)
Ute Tribe signs five-year agreement with University of Utah (4/16)
Ute Tribe reaches new agreement for use of name by university (4/15)
Ute Tribe meets to discuss future of University of Utah mascot (12/5)

Join the Conversation