The
Bureau of Indian Affairs is planning to hold separate meetings for recognized and non-recognized tribes as part of its push to reform the federal acknowledgment process.
The BIA will hold six meetings in July to discuss the
proposed regulations. But non-recognized tribes are being asked to attend the "public" meetings while recognized tribes get a separate "consultation" session.
"Tribal consultations are generally open only to representatives of federally recognized
Indian tribes," according to a
press release. "Public meetings are open to everyone."
The separate sessions are being scheduled even though Larry Roberts, the deputy assistant secretary at the BIA, previously admitted that few federally recognized tribes attended a series of meetings in July 2013.
"I would say general attendance of federally recognized tribes have been
relatively low," Roberts said at an August 6, 2013, meeting, according to the
transcript from that session. "A handful in Oregon, a handful in California, Michigan. So
it’s been primarily the public and non-federally recognized tribes that have
attended these sessions."
That August 6 meeting in Louisiana, however, appeared to be different. It drew a significant number of federally recognized tribes from the South and Eastern regions and the transcript shows it became contentious at times.
Chief B. Cheryl Smith of the
Jena Band of Choctaw Indians, whose Louisiana-based tribe gained recognition through the BIA in 1995, at one point suggested the meeting needed some special protection.
"Indian tribes are not going to
respect that kind of talk or comments if they
cannot act in a formally civilized brother
and sister forum," Smith said, according to the transcript. "And I would suggest that
you have some security in here."
Emotions were also running high at the time due to the death of
Earl Barbry, the longtime chairman of the
Tunica-Biloxi Tribe of Louisiana, whose federal recognition was finalized in 1981. His funeral took place on the same day as the meeting -- both events were held at the tribe's casino.
Relevant Documents:
Proposed Rule |
Press Release |
Comparison Chart (comparing current rule to proposed rule) |
Response
to Comments on June 2013 Discussion Draft |
Frequently
Asked Questions
Related Stories:
Little Shell Chippewa Tribe welcomes federal
recognition reform (5/23)
Federal recognition reforms might not help
tribes in Connecticut (5/23)
BIA announces regulation to reform federal
recognition process (5/22)
Opinion: Federal recognition
matters influenced by lobbyists (03/14)
Editorial: Connecticut argues against its own
recognized tribes (3/13)
Editorial: Some
Indians become inconvenient for Connecticut (3/7)
Editorial: Don't let BIA water down federal
recognition process (3/6)
Connecticut
governor opposes BIA federal recognition reforms (2/27)
Connecticut politicians want
BIA to drop recognition reform (8/30)
Connecticut leads opposition to federal recognition
reforms (8/26)
BIA
extends comment period on federal recognition proposal (08/13)
Join the Conversation