Rep. Markwayne Mullin, Cherokee citizen, voted against VAWA

Friday, March 1, 2013  

In one of his first major actions as a new member of the 113th Congress, Rep. Markwayne Mullin (R-Oklahoma), a citizen of the Cherokee Nation, voted against S.47, a bill to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act, on Thursday.

Mullin was one of 138 Republicans who voted against VAWA. He hasn't explained his position but many Republicans have expressed concerns about provisions to recognize tribal jurisdiction over non-Indians who commit domestic violence offenses on reservations.

On the other hand, Rep. Tom Cole (R-Oklahoma), a citizen of the Chickasaw Nation, voted for VAWA. He supported the tribal jurisdiction provisions.

"Tribal authorities will finally have the same ability to police and protect their land that all other local jurisdictions already enjoy," Cole said in a press release.

Cole also bucked his party and voted against the GOP version of the bill. He was one of 60 Republicans who helped clear the way for the Senate version of VAWA, the more favorable one for tribal interests.

Mullin and Cole are the only enrolled tribal members in the House.

Get the Story:
House easily passes Senate’s Violence Against Women bill (The Hill 2/28)
Most potential GOP Senate candidates vote against VAWA (The Hill 2/28)
House Clears Renewal of Domestic Violence Law (Roll Call 2/28)
Many Potential GOP Senate Candidates Vote Against VAWA (Roll Call 2/28)

Related Stories:
Tribal provisions in Violence Against Women Act endure battle (2/28)
House set to vote on VAWA with tribal jurisdiction provisions (2/27)
Louise Erdrich: Native women left at mercy of their predators (2/27)
Rep. Cole plans to introduce tribal amendment to VAWA bill (2/26)
MPR: Debating tribal jurisdiction provisions in VAWA update (2/26)
Opinion: Republicans sacrifice protections for Indian women (2/26)
Opinion: Flawed tribal jurisdiction provisions in House VAWA (2/26)
House to consider VAWA with different jurisdiction provisions (2/25)
NCAI denounces Sen. Grassley for 'fear mongering' on tribes (2/25)
Editorial: Congress must renew Violence Against Women Act (2/25)
Top GOP lawmaker doesn't think non-Indians will get fair trial (2/22)
GOP lawmakers introduce Violence Against Indian Women Act (2/21)
Tribal jurisdiction provisions of VAWA face questions in House (2/20)
Editorial: Close tribal jurisdiction loophole with VAWA update (2/19)
Rep. Tom Cole defends tribal jurisdiction provisions in VAWA (2/18)
Editorial: Congress must renew Violence Against Women Act (2/18)
NCAI President Keel calls on Congress to protect Indian women (2/15)
PRI: Professor Sarah Deer discusses tribal jurisdiction in VAWA (2/15)
Republican blames VAWA vote on tribal jurisdiction provisions (2/14)
Opinion: Tribal jurisdiction provision violates U.S. Constitution (2/14)
Tribes hail passage of VAWA with tribal jurisdiction provision (2/13)
Senate keeps tribal jurisdiction provisions in VAWA measure (2/12)
Senate set for vote on VAWA with tribal jurisdiction provisions (2/11)
Editorial: Reauthorize VAWA with tribal jurisdiction provisions (2/11)
Column: Failing to respond to violence against Native women (2/11)
Senate rejects alternative to VAWA without tribal jurisdiction (2/8)
Senate set to vote on VAWA with tribal jurisdiction provision (2/7)
White House backs tribal jurisdiction provisions in VAWA bill (2/5)
Frontline: Closing a loophole in VAWA to help Native women (2/5)
Ryan Dreveskracht: Tribal provisions of VAWA up for debate (2/5)
Opinion: The Violence Against Women Act is on life support (01/28)
Matt Remle: Violence against women, violence against earth (1/25)
Haley Elkins: Media goes silent on the failure to pass VAWA (1/24)
NCAI calls on Congress to pass Violence Against Women Act (01/24)