The court also said Graham can't be charged for aiding and abetting other Indians who are accused of murdering Aquash, who was Mi'kmaq from Canada. "The counts in both indictments failed to allege Graham’s Indian status, which cannot be cured by an application of aider-and-abettor liability," the decision stated.
Get the Story:Dismissal of key charge upheld in 1975 AIM case (AP 7/28) 8th Circuit Decision:
US v. Graham (July 28, 2009) Related Stories:
Aquash murder defendant seeks separate trial (7/22)
Aquash murder trial delayed until appeal resolved (5/6)
Hearing scheduled for Aquash murder defendants (5/5)
Case against Aquash murder defendant coming apart (5/1)
Judge rejects probe into BIA informant claim (4/30)
Trial for Aquash murder defendants set to begin (4/27)
8th Circuit hears Indian status appeal in Aquash case (8/16)
Aquash murder defendant seeks release until trial (4/10)
BIA official's link to informant raised in Aquash case (4/1)
8th Circuit to hear appeal in Aquash murder case (3/23)
Trial for Aquash murder suspects delayed again (3/3)
U.S. Attorney opposes separate Aquash trials (12/16)
Aquash murder defendant seeks separate trial (12/1)
Prosecutors seek to bolster Aquash murder case (11/11)
Prosecutors defend charges in Aquash murder case (11/3)
Aquash murder defendant raises 'Indian' issue (10/27)
Trial for Aquash murder delayed to February 2009 (10/20)