A federal judge accused the Bureau of Indian Affairs on Monday of
mismanaging the federal recognition process but said his options
for bringing the agency in line were limited.
At a lengthy hearing in Washington, D.C., U.S. District Judge
James Robertson questioned why the BIA's Office of Federal
Acknowledgment is taking so long to rule on the Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe's petition for recognition. The Massachusetts tribe
has been on the "ready" list for consideration for nine years, having
filed its initial application in 1975.
"The people involved in making the decisions at the BIA
have completely lost track of the whole concept of deadlines,"
Robertson said.
Silvia Sepulveda-Hambor, a Department of Justice lawyer
who is representing the BIA, tried to show that progress has
been made. She said the agency is implementing a strategic
plan to streamline the process and that the Mashpees are now second in line
for review.
"That's exciting," Robertson responded. "Stand back."
Robert E. Jordan, an attorney for the tribe, painted a picture
of indifference at the BIA that has caused harm to the health
and well-being of tribal members, more than two dozen of whom attended
yesterday's hearing. "A lot of the people in the tribe
are no longer with us," he told the court.
"A lot of the people here," he added, "are old and sick." He said the BIA's failure to make a decision has hurt the tribe's attempts to repatriate ancestors and artifacts, develop affordable
housing and ensure children stay within the tribe in adoption and child welfare cases.
Jordan said the "mindset" of the OFA staff leads them to ignore the BIA's regulations that call for decisions to be made in a timely fashion. "They don't even think of it as a deadline," he said.
"They see it as a minimum."
Throughout the proceeding, Robertson was sympathetic to the
tribe's cause. When Sepulveda-Hambor said the harms posed to
tribal members were "speculative" he suggested the court hold
an evidentiary hearing.
"Are you really going to dispute that?" he asked. "If we have
that hearing, we are going to let it all hang out," he added.
But Robertson discarded the notion of blowing the case into
the open in light of a ruling from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals
on the matter. In a unanimous August 2003 decision, the court
blocked Robertson from imposing a timeline on the BIA that would
require the agency to finalize the Mashpee petition ahead of
others in the "ready" list.
Sepulveda-Hambor repeatedly hammered on this point, saying the
regulations provide no strict deadlines on the process. "There
is no statutory for this court to interpret," she argued.
"There is no statutory framework. That is extremely, extremely
important."
But when she suggested that the court must defer to the BIA's
expertise, Robertson was not pleased. "I don't think I have
to defer to the management expertise of the BIA," he said.
"As far as I can tell, there is no management expertise there."
Sepulveda-Hambor said the already bogged-down process would
become even more unwieldy if the court intervenes.
"It would be replaced by a very ad-hoc system," she told
the judge. "It would be the petitioner that has
financing that gets moved."
Robertson agreed the D.C. Circuit's decision made it clear that any decision
"that vaulted the Mashpee over any other tribe [in the list]
would be quite difficult to sustain." "But the court of appeals
did not foreclose unreasonable delay," he added, "and what
we do about it."
Robertson speculated that he could order the BIA to finalize
a decision on the Mashpee by a certain date without upsetting the
others ahead in the list.
"If it means the cases ahead of it move faster, then that's what
it means," he said.
Robertson ordered the BIA to provide an update on the federal recognition
workload within 10 days. He didn't know when he would make a decision
but said, "I don't think it will take me nine years" to do it.
The Mashpee Tribe would benefit under H.R.512,
a bill to force the BIA to decide on a handful of pending recognition
petitions. Rep. Richard Pombo (R-California), the chairman of the
House Resources Committee, sponsored the bill, and held a hearing on
it last week.
"I don't care how busy the [Interior] Department is," he said after a BIA
official objected to the bill. "At some point over the last 20 or 30 years,
there should have been enough time to move forward on these."
Massachusetts currently has just one federally-recognized tribe, the Aquinnah of Gay Head.
The Mashpees are recognized by the state.
Court Decision:
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe v. Norton (August 1, 2003)
Relevant Links:
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe - http://mashpeewampanoagtribe.com
Judge blasts BIA for delays in recognition case
Tuesday, February 15, 2005
Trending in News
1 Tribes rush to respond to new coronavirus emergency created by Trump administration
2 'At this rate the entire tribe will be extinct': Zuni Pueblo sees COVID-19 cases double as first death is confirmed
3 Arne Vainio: 'A great sickness has been visited upon us as human beings'
4 Arne Vainio: Zoongide'iwin is the Ojibwe word for courage
5 Cayuga Nation's division leads to a 'human rights catastrophe'
2 'At this rate the entire tribe will be extinct': Zuni Pueblo sees COVID-19 cases double as first death is confirmed
3 Arne Vainio: 'A great sickness has been visited upon us as human beings'
4 Arne Vainio: Zoongide'iwin is the Ojibwe word for courage
5 Cayuga Nation's division leads to a 'human rights catastrophe'