The U.S. Supreme Court held oral arguments on Tuesday in a religious freedom case that could impact Native Americans.
The case involve the application of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The law was passed to protect members of the Native American Church who were prosecuted for using peyote and had lost their case before the high court.
O Centro Esprita Beneficiente Uni�o do Vegetal, a church based in New Mexico, is claiming the same sort of protection. The group, also known as UDV, uses a hallucinogenic tea that is brewed from a plant that grows in Brazil.
The Bush administration has tried to stop UDV from importing the plant but lost at the federal court and appellate court level. The Supreme Court refused to lift an injunction allowing the use of the tea.
According to news reports, several justices appeared to side with UDV. They said the government has not shown it has a "compelling interest" under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to interfere with the church's practices.
Some Native American Church advocates have criticized the comparison to their religion and their use of peyote. Depending on how the court rules, the decision may or may not have an impact on Native rights.
"The two situations seem to be alike, peyote and this," Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said, The New York Times reported. "The problem of preferring one religious group over another arises once there is an exception."
Get the Story:
Supreme Court weighs use of hallucinogen in worship
(AP 11/2)
Justices Weighing Narcotics Policy Against Needs of a Church (The New York Times 11/2)
pwnyt
Top US court hears religious case (BBC 11/2)
Roberts, Supreme Court May Allow Religious Use of Hallucinogen (Bloomberg News 11/1)
UDV Decisions:
En
Banc (November 12, 2004) | Panel
(September 4, 2003) | Federal
Judge (September 12, 2002)
Peyote Decision:
State
of Utah v. Mooney (June 22, 2004) (7/12)
Relevant Links:
Uniao do Vegetal - http://www.udv.org.br
Ayahuasca
- http://www.ayahuasca.com/
Related Stories:
Supreme Court Roundup: Indian law cases
rejected (04/19)
Supreme Court takes drug case tied to peyote
use (04/19)
Supreme Court reviews
case compared to peyote (04/14)
Religious group wins case tied to peyote use
(11/16)
Navajo Nation peyote, meth
legislation on hold (11/11)
Navajo bill
clarifies use of peyote on reservation (10/12)
U.S. may prosecute Native American Church
figure (08/31)
Non-Indian peyote case
could head to Supreme Court (08/16)
Ruling allows non-Indians to use peyote in Utah
(06/23)
Utah Supreme Court hears
arguments in peyote case (11/5)
Utah 'medicine' man at center of court
battles (08/26)
Peyote
limited to recognized U.S. Natives (5/7)
Peyote against tea dispute heats
up (1/24)
Case compared to
Native American Church (10/30)
Peyote use disputed in Utah
(5/18)
Man prevented from using
peyote (5/10)
'Medicine man'
settles lawsuit (3/30)
Peyote:
For Indians Only? (1/8)
Peyote
raid raises questions (7/17)
The Peyote Exemption (7/17)
Police seize peyote (7/12)
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Stories
Trending in News
1 Tribes rush to respond to new coronavirus emergency created by Trump administration
2 'At this rate the entire tribe will be extinct': Zuni Pueblo sees COVID-19 cases double as first death is confirmed
3 Arne Vainio: 'A great sickness has been visited upon us as human beings'
4 Arne Vainio: Zoongide'iwin is the Ojibwe word for courage
5 Cayuga Nation's division leads to a 'human rights catastrophe'
2 'At this rate the entire tribe will be extinct': Zuni Pueblo sees COVID-19 cases double as first death is confirmed
3 Arne Vainio: 'A great sickness has been visited upon us as human beings'
4 Arne Vainio: Zoongide'iwin is the Ojibwe word for courage
5 Cayuga Nation's division leads to a 'human rights catastrophe'
More Stories
Column: The invisible life of Sidney Jade Mahkuk News organizations seek to open Jourdain trial
News Archive
2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000