Advertise:   ads@blueearthmarketing.com   712.224.5420

Law
Mixed rulings on display of Ten Commandments


The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday issued two mixed rulings on the display of the Ten Commandments in public places.

In a 5- ruling, the court disallowed the display of the commandments at a courthouse in Kentucky. The majority said two counties put up the religious text with a religious purpose in mind, in violation of the U.S. Constitution's separation of church and state clause.

On the other hand, a display at the Texas Capitol doesn't violate the Constitution, the court said in another 5-4 ruling. The commandments had been up for decades and had an historical context, the majority concluded.

The Kentucky ruling was made by Justice David Souter and joined by the so-called liberal wing of the court. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor was the swing vote that made the case 5-4.

The Texas ruling was made by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and joined by the so-called conservative wing. Justice Stephen G. Breyer, who almost always sides with tribes in Indian law cases, was the swing vote.

Get the Story:
Justices Disallow Ten Commandments in Courthouses (The Washington Post 6/28)
pwpwd
Christian Groups Plan More Monuments (The Washington Post 6/28)
Justices Allow a Commandments Display, Bar Others (The New York Times 6/28)
pwnyt
Split Rulings on Displays Draw Praise and Dismay (The New York Times 6/28)

Decision in McCreary County v. ACLU:
Syllabus | Opinion [Souter] | Concurrence [O'Connor] | Dissent [Scalia]

Decision in Van Orden v. Perry:
Syllabus | Opinion [Rehnquist] | Concurrence [Scalia] | Concurrence [Thomas] | Concurrence [Breyer] | Dissent [Stevens] | Dissent [O'Connor] | Dissent [Souter]

Related Stories:
Supreme Court Roundup: Indian law cases rejected (04/19)
Appeals court says sacred sites worthy of protection (09/07)
Climbing group backs voluntary ban at sacred rock (07/06)
Group's challenge to sacred site policy rejected (03/31)
Norton aides silent on sacred sites (7/18)
Group bolsters argument with Indian law (06/12)
Zuni Pueblo takes mine fight on the road (7/17)
House clears sale of sacred site to church (6/18)
Input sought into sacred sites (6/5)
Congress considering sacred sites (5/21)
Supreme Court rejects property-rights claim (04/24)
Victory on sacred site case (04/19)
Tribes push action on sacred sites (3/21)
Tribe prevails on sacred site case (3/19)
Norton denies politics played role in drilling (6/7)
Norton hit on exploration of sacred site (6/6)
Myers reversing sacred site opinion (10/25)
Bush nominee has no 'agenda' on Clinton decisions (6/21)
Babbitt denies Calif. gold mine (1/19)
BLM recommends mine rejection (11/10)