The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday issued two mixed rulings on the display of the Ten Commandments in public places.
In a 5- ruling, the court disallowed the display of the commandments at a courthouse in Kentucky. The majority said two counties put up the religious text with a religious purpose in mind, in violation of the U.S. Constitution's separation of church and state clause.
On the other hand, a display at the Texas Capitol doesn't violate the Constitution, the court said in another 5-4 ruling. The commandments had been up for decades and had an historical context, the majority concluded.
The Kentucky ruling was made by Justice David Souter and joined by the so-called liberal wing of the court. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor was the swing vote that made the case 5-4.
The Texas ruling was made by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and joined by the so-called conservative wing. Justice Stephen G. Breyer, who almost always sides with tribes in Indian law cases, was the swing vote.
Get the Story:
Justices Disallow Ten Commandments in Courthouses
(The Washington Post 6/28)
pwpwd
Christian Groups Plan More Monuments (The Washington Post 6/28)
Justices Allow a Commandments Display, Bar Others (The New York Times 6/28)
pwnyt
Split Rulings on Displays Draw Praise and Dismay (The New York Times 6/28)
Decision in McCreary County v. ACLU:
Syllabus |
Opinion [Souter] |
Concurrence [O'Connor] |
Dissent [Scalia]
Decision in Van Orden v. Perry:
Syllabus |
Opinion [Rehnquist] |
Concurrence [Scalia] |
Concurrence [Thomas] |
Concurrence [Breyer] |
Dissent [Stevens] |
Dissent [O'Connor] |
Dissent [Souter]
Related Stories:
Supreme Court Roundup: Indian law cases
rejected (04/19)
Appeals court says sacred sites worthy of
protection (09/07)
Climbing group backs voluntary ban at sacred
rock (07/06)
Group's challenge to sacred
site policy rejected (03/31)
Norton aides silent on sacred sites
(7/18)
Group bolsters
argument with Indian law (06/12)
Zuni Pueblo takes mine fight on the
road (7/17)
House clears
sale of sacred site to church (6/18)
Input sought into sacred sites
(6/5)
Congress considering
sacred sites (5/21)
Supreme
Court rejects property-rights claim (04/24)
Victory on sacred site case
(04/19)
Tribes push action on
sacred sites (3/21)
Tribe
prevails on sacred site case (3/19)
Norton denies politics played role in
drilling (6/7)
Norton hit on
exploration of sacred site (6/6)
Myers reversing sacred site opinion
(10/25)
Bush nominee has no
'agenda' on Clinton decisions (6/21)
Babbitt denies Calif. gold mine
(1/19)
BLM recommends mine
rejection (11/10)
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Stories
Trending in News
1 Tribes rush to respond to new coronavirus emergency created by Trump administration
2 'At this rate the entire tribe will be extinct': Zuni Pueblo sees COVID-19 cases double as first death is confirmed
3 Arne Vainio: 'A great sickness has been visited upon us as human beings'
4 Arne Vainio: Zoongide'iwin is the Ojibwe word for courage
5 Cayuga Nation's division leads to a 'human rights catastrophe'
2 'At this rate the entire tribe will be extinct': Zuni Pueblo sees COVID-19 cases double as first death is confirmed
3 Arne Vainio: 'A great sickness has been visited upon us as human beings'
4 Arne Vainio: Zoongide'iwin is the Ojibwe word for courage
5 Cayuga Nation's division leads to a 'human rights catastrophe'
More Stories
Supreme Court rejects suit in domestic violence case Supreme Court opens file-sharing firms to suits
News Archive
2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000