For many decades, the U.S. Supreme Court was a place tribes and individual Indians could look to obtain justice. But observers say the court's latest ruling involving the Oneida Nation shows how the tables have turned.
"I've been in this business 35 years, and I would certainly say that over the last 20 years, the courts have been less sympathetic to Indian issues," Tim Weaver, an attorney for the Yakima Nation of Washington who has argued before the court twice, told The Oneida Observer-Dispatch.
Robert Odawi Porter of Syracuse University's Center for Indigenous Law, Governance & Citizenship said the court took the case only to reverse it. He said the decision was unfair because it sanctioned the theft of the tribe's land.
But people on the other side of the case say their views were finally heard, for the first time, by the high court. The city of Sherrill, the smallest in New York, and other communities plan to impose taxes on the Oneida Nation because the court held that the tribe's newly acquired properties cannot be considered Indian Country without going through the land-into-trust process.
Critics of the tribe and Indian policy also say the decision calls into question five land claim settlements in New York. Three out-of-state tribes whose ancestors left New York more than 100 years ago would be allowed to return and assert some governmental rights.
Meanwhile, local officials are considering sending tax bills to the Oneida Nation, the Cayuga Nation and the Seneca-Cayuga Tribe of Oklahoma. The tribes have acquired land without going through the land-into-trust process.
In an editorial, The Auburn Citizen endorses the collection of taxes. "This county has waited more than two decades for the nation's highest court to resolve this legal issue, and as a result lost tens of thousands of dollars in unpaid taxes from the Cayuga Indian Nation and the Seneca-Cayuga Tribe of Oklahoma," the paper says. "Each day those funds go uncollected is another day of money lost for all of the taxpayers living here."
Get the Story:
How Sherrill won its case
(The Oneida Observer-Dispatch 4/7)
3 Indian businesses may face foreclosing (The Syracuse Post-Standard 4/7)
Local people testify at Albany land claim hearing (Journal Register News Service 4/6)
Editorial: No reason to stall on Indian tax collection (The Auburn Citizen 4/7)
Get the Decision:
Syllabus
| Opinion
[Ginsburg] | Concurrence
[Souter] | Dissent
[Stevens]
Relevant Links:
Oneida Nation - http://www.oneida-nation.net
NARF-NCAI Tribal Supreme Court Project - http://doc.narf.org/sc/index.html
Decision in Oneida Indian Nation v. City of Sherrill:
Majority Opinion | Van Graafeiland Dissent
Decision in Cayuga Indian Nation v. Village of Union
Springs:
Decision | Order (April 23, 2004)
Related Stories:
Fallout from Supreme Court ruling on Oneida
Nation (4/6)
BIA official calls
high court ruling 'quite depressing' (03/31)
Major defeat for Oneida Nation in Supreme Court
case (3/30)
Pataki, city, foes pleased
with Oneida Nation ruling (3/30)
Major
defeat for Oneida Nation in Supreme Court case (3/29)
Oneida Nation ruling could impact land claims
(01/13)
Passage of time at issue in Oneida
Nation case (01/12)
Oneida Nation wants
court to uphold promises (1/12)
Supreme
Court rejects two Indian law cases (1/12)
Supreme Court to hear Oneida Nation land dispute
(1/10)
New York municipalities pony up
for court brief (12/14)
Hearing set for
Oneida Nation treaty rights case (11/12)
Supreme Court takes action on Indian law cases
(11/02)
Tribes file briefs in Oneida Nation
land case (10/18)
Supreme Court Roundup:
2003-2004 Term (07/08)
Supreme Court to
hear dispute over Oneida Nation land (06/29)
Oneida Nation sees support in Bush administration
brief (06/08)
Appeal planned in Cayuga
Nation land rights case (04/30)
Cayuga Nation land rights upheld by federal
judge (4/26)
Cayuga Nation's plans
for land worry some in village (04/07)
Report: Seneca-Cayuga Tribe has bigger plans in
store (04/06)
NIGC accused of
'ducking' casino land issue in N.Y. (03/23)
Judge in N.Y. hears Seneca-Cayuga land
dispute (03/12)
Supreme Court asks for
DOJ brief in Oneida case (02/24)
Bill would terminate out-of-state sovereign
rights (09/26)
Appeals expected in
Seneca-Cayuga Tribe's land case (09/10)
Judge to decide fate of Seneca-Cayuga Tribe's
land (9/9)
Cayuga tribes slowly
reclaiming ancestral territory (09/02)
Okla. tribe says court decision bolsters
case (07/24)
Cayuga Nation welcomes
Indian Country decision (07/23)
Oneida Nation wins treaty lands case
(7/22)
Law
Supreme Court called less sympathetic to Indians
Thursday, April 7, 2005
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Stories
Trending in News
1 Tribes rush to respond to new coronavirus emergency created by Trump administration
2 'At this rate the entire tribe will be extinct': Zuni Pueblo sees COVID-19 cases double as first death is confirmed
3 Arne Vainio: 'A great sickness has been visited upon us as human beings'
4 Arne Vainio: Zoongide'iwin is the Ojibwe word for courage
5 Cayuga Nation's division leads to a 'human rights catastrophe'
2 'At this rate the entire tribe will be extinct': Zuni Pueblo sees COVID-19 cases double as first death is confirmed
3 Arne Vainio: 'A great sickness has been visited upon us as human beings'
4 Arne Vainio: Zoongide'iwin is the Ojibwe word for courage
5 Cayuga Nation's division leads to a 'human rights catastrophe'
More Stories
Court to hear dispute over Yakama Nation utility fee Editorial: Economic development a solution
News Archive
2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000