Interior Secretary Gale Norton urged Congress on Thursday to get
involved in the battle over an historical accounting that the Bush
administration is taking to a federal appeals court.
In testimony before a Senate Appropriations subcommittee, Norton
sounded a warning about an injunction reinstated by
U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth last month. She said the court
ordered the department to undertake a costly accounting
of the Individual Indian Money (IIM) trust.
"This order requires us to back to 1887 to verify every single
transaction since that time," Norton said.
Norton said the effort will require the federal government to
subpoena and compile records from oil and gas companies, individual Indians
and tribal governments. "The department has estimated that the
total cost of this accounting work will be $10 to $12 billion,"
she testified.
Norton did not suggest a course of action for the lawmakers at
the hearing, who appeared more interested in cuts for tribal colleges and
construction of Bureau of Indian Affairs schools than the trust.
Only one lawmaker, Sen. Conrad Burns (R-Montana), the chairman of
the subcommittee, brought up the issue when he said the
government was "pouring money down a black hole."
"Between you and judges and everything else, it's got most of us up here on the Hill sort of confused," he said of the $135 million request, an increase of $78 million, for ongoing accounting activities.
But Norton's decision to lead off her testimony with a lengthy statement
about the court order signaled the Bush administration's
stance on the issue. The Department of Justice filed an emergency
motion to stay Lamberth's ruling pending an appeal.
Hours after Norton finished her testimony, the D.C. Circuit Court of
Appeals declined to issue the stay. Instead, the court asked the
Cobell plaintiffs to provide a response by March 17. The Bush
administration's final brief is due March 24.
"It appears the Court of Appeals is getting the message: justice
delayed is justice denied," lead plaintiff Elouise Cobell said
in a statement. "We welcome the opportunity to make our
case before the appeals court, and believe that the accounting
ordered by the district court will proceed."
The activity sets the stage for another battle on the lawsuit
in the halls of Congress. The Senate Indian Affairs Committee
and the House Resources Committee are jointly pursuing efforts
to settle the case and provide a fix to the system.
Some lawmakers, however, are considering reinstating the "midnight
rider" that halted the accounting last year. The Cobell plaintiffs,
tribes and a large contingent of House members
led by Rep. Richard Pombo (R-California)
tried to defeat the rider but were unsuccessful.
The issue was raised earlier this month after Norton brought up
Lamberth's order at a hearing of the House Interior
Appropriations subcommittee. Over the past three years,
Reps. Charles Taylor (R-North Carolina)
and Norm Dicks (D-Washington), the chairman and ranking member
of the subcommittee, have tried to force
a settlement of the Cobell case by inserting language in
Interior's appropriations bill.
Interior officials repeatedly denied involvement with the effort
but the White House last year supported the midnight rider.
And Norton's used it to seek a stay of the original accounting
order that Lamberth had issued in September 2003.
The D.C. Circuit eventually set aside Lamberth's order but, as
Norton noted yesterday, did not reach the merits of the rider.
That led Lamberth to reissue the broad historical accounting
injunction late last month.
The Bush administration is currently performing
an accounting much more limited in scope. The Office of Historical
Trust Accounting is not verifying land holdings, probates or
leases and is only examining accounts that were open as of
1994
According to Norton, the effort has shown that errors in
individual and tribal accounts are "infrequent and small." Although
the project is not complete, she said there have only been
$1.5 million in discrepancies
on a throughput of more than $15 billion in individual and
tribal trust funds.
The Cobell plaintiffs welcome a settlement, Native American
Rights Fund attorney Keith Harper said in Senate testimony
on Wednesday. But the two sides differ on the potential
amount owed to individual Indians -- department officials suggest
it would be in the "low millions" rather than billions.
Listen to Testimony on Trust:
MP3: Secretary Gale Norton (1.91 MB)
Court Order:
Cobell v. Norton (March 10, 2005)
Relevant Links:
Indian Trust: Cobell v. Norton - http://www.indiantrust.com
Cobell
v. Norton, Department of Justice - http://www.usdoj.gov/civil/cases/cobell/index.htm
Indian
Trust, Department of Interior - http://www.doi.gov/indiantrust
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Stories
Trending in News
1 Tribes rush to respond to new coronavirus emergency created by Trump administration
2 'At this rate the entire tribe will be extinct': Zuni Pueblo sees COVID-19 cases double as first death is confirmed
3 Arne Vainio: 'A great sickness has been visited upon us as human beings'
4 Arne Vainio: Zoongide'iwin is the Ojibwe word for courage
5 Cayuga Nation's division leads to a 'human rights catastrophe'
2 'At this rate the entire tribe will be extinct': Zuni Pueblo sees COVID-19 cases double as first death is confirmed
3 Arne Vainio: 'A great sickness has been visited upon us as human beings'
4 Arne Vainio: Zoongide'iwin is the Ojibwe word for courage
5 Cayuga Nation's division leads to a 'human rights catastrophe'
More Stories
Jodi Rave: Indians don't pay taxes and other myths Montana's Indian lawmakers change focus of caucus
News Archive
2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000