Montana judge blocks Keystone XL construction
By Hunter Pauli
Montana Free Press
montanafreepress.org
MISSOULA — A Great Falls federal judge on Thursday blocked construction of the controversial Keystone XL oil pipeline, ruling the federal government did not adequately consider the potential environmental hazards the pipeline posed to the climate and communities along the proposed route.
In his
54-page ruling, Montana U.S. District Judge Brian Morris found the federal government violated the National Environmental Policy Act by failing to adequately address potential spills, the pipeline’s cumulative effects on greenhouse gases, its necessity based on oil prices, and its effect on cultural resources.
Morris vacated the U.S. Department of State’s 2017 decision to build Keystone XL until a new study is completed.
The proposed route of
the Keystone XL pipeline in northeastern Montana. Sources: USGS, U.S. Census
Bureau, Montana DEQ. Graphic by Eric Dietrich for Montana Free Press
Billings-based Northern Plains Resource Council was one of the lead plaintiffs in the lawsuit.
“We’re thrilled with Judge Morris’s ruling today,” NPRC chairwoman Becky Mitchell said in a press release. “In essence, this decision sends TransCanada back to the drawing board.”
Representatives for TransCanada could not immediately be reached. A message to a representative from the Montana Petroleum Association was also not immediately returned late Thursday.
Fort Peck tribal member Angeline Cheek is an outspoken opponent of Keystone XL, and has helped organize prayer walks across the reservation, including one starting Sept. 21, to raise awareness of the threat the pipeline poses to the tribal community. Photo by Erika Peterman /
Montana Free Press
The Obama administration in 2015 nixed Keystone XL over concerns that the tar sands oil it would transport would void America’s commitment to the Paris Agreement on climate change. That decision was based on the state department’s 2014 environmental study.
The Trump administration in 2017 resurrected Keystone XL on the basis of the 2014 environmental study, a decision Morris said, “simply discarded prior factual findings related to climate change to support its course reversal.”
In response to the Trump administration’s decision, a
coalition of environmental and indigenous rights groups sued the federal government in March 2017. Morris’s ruling presents a major victory for groups opposed to the pipeline.
The news of the decision spread quickly across Indian Country social media Thursday night, including northeast Montana’s Fort Peck Indian Reservation, whose residents say
Keystone XL construction would threaten their drinking water and communities.
Fort Peck’s aquifer was turned undrinkable by 20th-century oil drilling, and communities on and off the reservation are getting water from a $300 million Congressionally mandated water system on the Missouri River, Fort Peck’s southern border. Keystone XL is proposed to cross the Missouri a quarter-mile upriver from the tribal border.
Angeline Cheek, an organizer for Indian People’s Action, said she was happy to hear news of Morris’ ruling but was not convinced it means the end for the pipeline.
“The fight is not over yet, the fight is never over for us,” Cheek said.
Hunter
Pauli is a Seattle-born, Missoula-based freelance investigative reporter and
graduate of the University of Montana School of Journalism. You can follow him
on Twitter
@paulimeth.
This story originally
appeared
on Montana Free Press on November 8, 2018. It is published under a
Creative
Commons license.
Join the Conversation
Related Stories
Documents
indicate plans to spy on Native opponents of Keystone XL (September 14,
2018)
'We're
just outnumbered and out-moneyed': Fort Peck Tribes fight Keystone XL
(August 30, 2018)
