The pileup has left the Muscogee (Creek) Nation in a delicate position. Though the tribe has not taken a view on Murphy's guilt, Chief James Floyd has called the case one of significant importance to his people. "Where we exercise our sovereignty isn't just for the good of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation, but the good of everybody who lives within that and everybody within the state of Oklahoma," Floyd said during his Oklahoma State University’s Sovereignty Speaks session on January 18. Tribal officials and advocates also note that the situation isn't without redress. The federal government can still prosecute Murphy for the 1999 death of George Jacobs, though he would not be eligible for the federal death penalty. "We want safety, we want education, we want prosecution, we want protection of children, we want adoption processes that are fair -- just like everybody else," Floyd said. The Trump administration, proud to pitch itself as tough on crime, is taking a different view. The brief argues that prosecuting offenses in Indian Country in eastern Oklahoma would require too much time and effort. "The federal government lacks sufficient investigatory and prosecutorial resources in the area to handle that volume of cases," government attorneys wrote. As Murphy was making its way through the federal courts after spending years in the state system, a familiar name appeared on one of the briefs. Scott Pruitt, Oklahoma's former attorney general, is now serving as the head of the Environmental Protection Agency for President Donald Trump. Though neither Pruitt nor the EPA are involved in Murphy, they are deeply tied to a second reservation boundary dispute that's also pending before the Supreme Court. At issue is whether the Wind River Reservation in Wyoming, home to the Eastern Shoshone Tribe and the Northern Arapaho Tribe, has been diminished. As with Oklahoma, a broad array of industry interests opposed the tribes' attempts to assert authority over a portion of their homelands that includes Riverton, the largest city in Fremont County. During the Obama administration, the EPA supported the tribes and approved their applications to be treated as states under certain environmental laws. The picture changed with Pruitt in charge. After the 10th Circuit ruled against the EPA in February 2017 , he abandoned the tribes and refused to join their request for a rehearing that could have led to a different outcome. So far, Pruitt's been absent as the tribes have asked the Supreme Court to overturn the 10th Circuit. But Indian Country isn't staying quiet -- three major inter-tribal organizations, including the nation's largest, and more than a dozen tribes are stepping in where the federal government won't. "This case returns to the forefront a serious challenge for Indian nations that has recurred throughout their American experience – namely, how to protect their Indian lands – their 'Indian country' – from being disestablished, diminished, or, effectively terminated through legal challenges," the National Congress of American Indians, the Great Plains Tribal Chairmen’s Association, the Inter Tribal Association of Arizona and the tribal coalition said in their March 23 brief.
The petition in Royal v. Murphy was filed on behalf of Terry Royal, the warden of the Oklahoma State Penitentiary. Murphy, who will be turning 49 later this month, is being held there after being convicted of second degree murder in 2000. His sentence reads "DEATH" in state Department of Corrections records. Murphy has until April 9 to respond to the petition. After that, Royal will be able to file one more reply before the Supreme Court deliberates whether to grand or deny the petition. If it's accepted, the justices will accept additional briefs and hear arguments before deciding whether the 10th Circuit was right. If they do not grant the petition, the 10th Circuit ruling will stand. The petitions in Eastern Shoshone Tribe v. Wyoming and Northern Arapaho Tribe v. Wyoming were filed on February 16. The state of Wyoming and other state parties have until April 23 to respond. The Supreme Court's last reservation boundary case was Nebraska v. Parker in 2016. By a unanimous 8-0 vote, the justices held that Congress did not diminish the reservation of the Omaha Tribe, handing defeat to state interests in Nebraska. The decision affirmed the criteria used in reservation diminishment cases although Justice Clarence Thomas noted that each situation is fact-intensive. However, the foremost factor is Congressional intent, he noted. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions:
Murphy v. Royal [Muscogee (Creek) Nation] (August 8, 2017)
Wyoming v. Environmental Protection Agency [Wind River Reservation] (February 22, 2017)
Join the Conversation
Related Stories
Tribes
take Wind River Reservation boundary case to Supreme Court (February 22,
2018)Tribes see continued challenges as more cases head to highest court (February 21, 2018)
Appeals court won't revisit historic decision in Muscogee Nation boundary case (November 9, 2017)
Muscogee Nation citizen seeks dismissal of murder charge as boundary case heats up (September 29, 2017)
Oklahoma plans to ask court to reconsider ruling on Muscogee Nation boundaries (August 24, 2017)
Trump administration abandons tribes in battle over boundaries of reservation in Wyoming (August 14, 2017)
Muscogee Nation welcomes decision affirming the boundaries of its reservation (August 9, 2017)
Muscogee Nation citizen wins reversal of death penalty conviction in Oklahoma (August 8, 2017)
Appeals court hears slew of Indian cases amid focus on Supreme Court nominee (March 23, 2017)