The court's last sovereign immunity case was Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community. In May 2014, the justices held that the Bay Mills Indian Community could not be sued without its consent by the state of Michigan. The vote was close too -- 5 to 4. The court granted the Upper Skagit petition on December 8, 2017, after reviewing what are known as briefs on a petition for a writ of certiorari. Now that the case has been accepted, the justices are accepting briefs on the merits. The Upper Skagit Indian Tribe submitted its opening brief on Monday. The other landowners in the property dispute, Sharline Lundgren and Ray Lundgren, will be able to file their own response brief, and then the tribe will be able to file a final reply. Outside parties could also submit amicus briefs to the court. The case isn't the only one from Washington on the high court's current docket. The justices have agreed to hear Washington v. U.S., a treaty rights case that will determine whether the state is responsible for failing to fix hundreds of culverts, or passageways for salmon. So far in this term, the court hasn't released any Indian law decisions. But a ruling is expected soon in Patchak v. Zinke, whose outcome will determine whether Congress can protect tribes from litigation against their homelands. Arguments took place last November. Washington Supreme Court Decision:
Lundgren v. Upper Skagit Indian Tribe (February 16, 2017)
Join the Conversation
Related Stories
San
Manuel Band awards large grant to Tribal Supreme Court Project (January 24, 2018)Supreme Court shakes up docket by accepting sovereignty case at request of tribe (December 11, 2017)