The February 7 decision against a preliminary injunction came on the same day the Trump administration approved the final portion of the pipeline. A different federal judge later said the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers took action without fully considering objections raised by opponents. By that time, the $3.8 billion pipeline had already been completed and was shipping oil. The judge has since refused to halt operations while the Army Corps comes up with a new analysis that addresses tribal concerns. An answer isn't expected until spring 2018. Read More on the Story:
Lawsuit filed by Dakota Access protesters to proceed (The Associated Press November 14, 2017) 8th Circuit Court of Appeals Decision:
Dundon v. Kirchmeier (November 14, 2017)
Join the Conversation
Related Stories
Native
American psychologists slam police tactics a year after Standing Rock
(October 30, 2017)University agrees to Dakota Access lecture after Mark Trahant complained (October 30, 2017)
Mark Trahant quits post after university stifles discussion on Dakota Access Pipeline (October 27, 2017)
Kelly Hayes: New documentary remembers Standing Rock in beauty and catastrophe (October 24, 2017)
YES! Magazine: Native women pressure banks to divest from big energy projects (October 23, 2017)
Native Sun News Today: Tribes decry court ruling favoring Dakota Access Pipeline (October 20, 2017)
Judge deals tribes major setback with decision in Dakota Access Pipeline case (October 11, 2017)
YES! Magazine: Water protectors return to Standing Rock for healing ceremony (October 2, 2017)
North Dakota accepts $15M from wealthy backers of Dakota Access Pipeline (September 29, 2017)
North Dakota sheriff scrubs Facebook of incriminating #NoDAPL information (December 1, 2016)
North Dakota sheriff hit with lawsuit as governor moves in on #NoDAPL camp (November 29, 2016)