The
Senate Committee on Indian
Affairs is hosting a session on a tough topic that has taken on added significance due to the
#NoDAPL movement, the Trump administration's push for more infrastructure and some high-profile legal disputes.
The protracted battle over the
Dakota Access Pipeline underscored long-running tribal complaints regarding inadequate consultation about projects that impact their communities. In June, two weeks after the controversial project was completed, a judge ruled that the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers failed to address concerns raised by opponents in Indian Country.
President
Donald Trump himself intervened to ensure the crude oil pipeline became operational. In boasting of his decision, he insisted just three weeks ago that critics "didn't know" why they fought the project as he vowed to
push through similar developments.
Throw in some
closely-watched lawsuits -- including one that
industry groups hope will be heard by the nation's highest court -- and a near-perfect storm is forming over Capitol Hill, the likes of which
hasn't been seen in more than a decade. That's the backdrop for a roundtable titled “Best Practices in Tribal Consultation and Stakeholder Engagement: Federal Permitting and Infrastructure Project Review in Indian Country."
The session on Thursday afternoon will bring together representatives of tribal organizations, federal agencies and industry. Although a list of participants hasn't been publicly released, it's expected to include the
National Congress of American Indians, the
United South and Eastern Tribes, the
Federal Communications Commission, the
Department of the Interior and, yes, even the Army Corps.
In response to the #NoDAPL movement, the Obama administration took a stab at the issue when it initiated
tribal consultation regarding infrastructure. But the
final report has basically been forgotten because it wasn't released until January 18, two days before the Trump team took over and essentially ignored its recommendations by approving Dakota Access and the
Keystone XL Pipeline.
"These projects must include tribes early in the process so the negative impacts to our lands, waters, and sacred places can be avoided," NCAI President Brian Cladoosby said in June in response to the
court decision in the #NoDAPL case. "Environmental justice demands that the rights of tribes are respected.”
The ruling wasn't the only victory when it comes to infrastructure and consultation. Since March, Indian landowners and tribes have won rulings affecting a
natural gas pipeline that has been operating illegally for nearly two decades, a transmission line whose
agreement was negotiated more than 50 years ago but has never been updated and a wind farm that was
built without compensating the tribal owners of the underlying mineral estate.
Industry interests, naturally, are paying attention. They've already got the ear of a friendly president and his administration -- including
Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke, who appears so bothered by delays in the federal review process that he's
labeled nearly a third of his subordinates as disloyal.
But when energy corporations start losing in court, or when they feel a federal process isn't going their way, they turn to Congress. That's what happened in 2005, when a national energy policy law mandated a study of rights-of-way in response to a dispute involving one tribe and one gas pipeline.
Two years later the
study was completed. Yet despite the lobbying frenzy that it generated,
almost no one talks about it -- it's not even mentioned in the January report on infrastructure.
The roundtable takes place at 2:30pm Eastern in Room 628 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building. The committee hasn't said whether it will be webcast.
Senate Committee on Indian Affairs Notice:
Roundtable on “Best Practices in Tribal Consultation and Stakeholder Engagement: Federal Permitting and Infrastructure Project Review in Indian Country.”
(September 28, 2017)
Join the Conversation
Related Stories
Osage
Nation secures landmark decision in dispute over construction of wind farm (September 18, 2017)
Republicans
revive Indian energy measure with a more friendly president in office (September 11, 2017)
Interior
Department tries to streamline lengthy environmental review process
(September 8, 2017)
President
Trump finally acknowledges opposition to Dakota Access Pipeline (September
6, 2017)
Wealthy
backers of Dakota Access claim opponents caused 'billions' in losses (August
23, 2017)
Energy
firm seeks to keep illegal pipeline in place over objections of Indian
landowners in Oklahoma (August 15, 2017)
Battle
brews as utility company takes sovereignty dispute to Supreme Court (August
2, 2017)
President
Trump promises 'freedom' for tribes seeking to exploit their resources (June
29, 2017)