Indianz.Com on SoundCloud: High Risk American Indian and Alaska Native Program
Still, tribal leaders have been supportive of efforts to reform the IHS. Many point to the Great Plains Area, a region that includes Nebraska and South Dakota, as one place where the provisions in the bill might bring about change. In 2015 and 2016, an unprecedented three facilities in the Great Plains lost federal certifications due to unresolved problems. Nearly two years later, the hospital that serves the Omaha Tribe and the Winnebago Tribe is still unable to collect revenues that help supplement the IHS budget. "I just come here yet again with no good news -- we're not certified, we're pushing it back further," Victoria Kitcheyan, the treasurer for the Winnebago Tribe, told key members of the House Appropriations Committee, last week. "Frankly, I'm tired of telling you the same thing over and over again." On Wednesday, the same committee dug deeper and learned more about the way the IHS deals with crises. The agency simply shuffles officials and executives who failed to make improvement to other regions and brings in other leaders who end up being transferred somewhere else.
Indianz.Com on SoundCloud: Budget Hearing – Indian Health Service
"When there's a problem in one area, they move people around to go to that area, to fix the problem, to fix the crisis, but it results in a big churn among the area offices," Kathleen King, the director of the Health Care Team at the Government Accountability Office told the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies at the hearing on "high risk" programs, a designation that applies to the IHS. The pattern repeated itself with Chris Buchanan, who happens to be serving as the "acting" head of the IHS. He was called to the Great Plains last year to address certification and other problems but the assignment was not a permanent one. Before Buchanan showed up to serve as "acting" director for the Great Plains, the region saw four different directors between 2011 and 2015, Rep. Betty McCollum (D-Minnesota), the top Democrat on the subcommittee, said. One hospital in South Dakota that lost certification had 7 different chief executive officers during that time period. The Omaha-Winnebago hospital in Nebraska had 10, she noted. "There's a high turnover," Buchanan acknowledged. He said the IHS is focusing on recruitment, accountability and transparency in the Great Plains, the same areas targeted in the reform bill. “It would be a significant understatement to say tribal members deserve better health care than what they’re accustomed to receiving from IHS," said Sen. John Thune (R-South Dakota), a co-sponsor of the bill. S.1250 is the Senate version of the bill. A companion, H.R.2662, has been introduced in the House. Government Accountability Office Report:
HIGH RISK: Actions Needed to Address Serious Weaknesses in Federal Management of Programs Serving Indian Tribes (May 24, 2017)
Join the Conversation
Related Stories
Kevin
Washburn: Indian Country feels the pain with Donald Trump (May 25, 2017)Northwest tribes slam Donald Trump's budget for cuts to Indian programs (May 24, 2017)
President Trump confirms Indian Country's fears with budget request (May 23, 2017)
Mark Trahant: Funds for Indian health in danger under Republican rule (May 22, 2017)
Lawmakers push to renew Special Diabetes Program for Indians (May 18, 2017)
Bipartisan task force announced to look into Indian Health Service (May 18, 2017)
Indian Health Service budget and 'high risk' tribal programs on agenda for upcoming hearings (May 17, 2017)
Indian Country leaders testify about funding needs on Capitol Hill (May 16, 2017)
Hearing on high-risk tribal programs highlights void in Trump leadership team (May 15, 2017)
Indian lawmakers support Republican repeal of Affordable Care Act (May 5, 2017)
Mark Trahant: Republican bill takes billions from Indian health care (May 4, 2017)
Senate Committee on Indian Affairs looks at 'high risk' Indian programs (May 3, 2017)
Funding bill holds the line for Indian Country ahead of Trump cuts (May 2, 2017)