Matthew Fletcher: Commentary on Supreme Court oral arguments

Members and leaders of the Omaha Tribe of Nebraska in Washington, D.C., on January 20, 2016. Photo form Facebook

Professor Matthew Fletcher of Turtle Talk analyzes the U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments in Nebraska v. Parker, a reservation diminishment case affecting the Omaha Tribe of Nebraska:
There seemed to be two major threads of argument in Nebraska v. Parker. The first is what the Supreme Court granted cert to decide, whether the Omaha reservation boundaries had been diminished. The second seemed to be about the applicability and impact of the Sherrill decision.

On the reservation boundaries matter, the federal government made a strong case for the proposition that the State of Nebraska long has acknowledged the reservation boundaries of the Omaha reservation’s western side

However, in that part of the reservation, about 90 percent of the residents are nonmembers. So the real meat of the argument delved into the murky waters of whether the Court’s Sherrill decision focusing on the “settled expectations” of the residents and the governments would be upset by the tribe’s liquor ordinance. [BTW Sherrill is an issue waived (i.e., never cited) by the State at the Eighth Circuit — opening brief, reply brief.]

Get the Story:
Matthew Fletcher: Commentary on the Omaha Reservation Boundaries Argument (Turtle Talk 1/20)

Also Today:
Who Is In Charge When Non-Indians Settle on Indian Reservation Land? (U.S. News & World Report 1/20)
U.S. Supreme Court Weighs Indian Case With Implications for Schools (Education Week 1/20)
Tribes Face Uphill Fights in High Court (The National Law Journal 1/20)
Supreme Court hears Omaha Tribe boundary dispute case (The Sioux City Journal 1/21)
U.S. Supreme Court to decide if Pender is part of Omaha reservation (The Omaha World-Herald 1/21)
Supreme Court Hears Tax Case Over Indian Land Boundary (Bloomberg BNA 1/21)
Supreme Court hears arguments in tribal land, hovercraft hunting disputes (Jurist 1/21)

Supreme Court Documents:
Oral Argument Transcript | Docket Sheet No. 14-1406 | Questions Presented | Hearing List: January 2016

8th Circuit Decision:
Smith v. Parker (December 19, 2014)

Federal Court Documents:
Status Report [Includes tribal court decision] | Court Order

Join the Conversation
Related Stories:
Supreme Court hears Omaha Tribe reservation boundary dispute (1/20)
Omaha Tribe lands in Supreme Court in reservation boundary case (1/19)
Mike Myers: Supreme Court ready to cheat Native people again (1/18)
Lyle Denniston: Supreme Court considers Omaha Tribe dispute (1/14)
Matthew Birkhold: Supreme Court to hear reservation dispute (12/21)
Supreme Court schedules oral arguments in Omaha Tribe dispute (12/02)
Supreme Court agrees to hear Omaha Reservation boundary case (10/02)
Supreme Court considers petitions in slew of Indian law cases (09/22)
Obama backs Omaha Tribe in dispute over reservation boundaries (08/24)
Omaha Tribe surprised by appeal in reservation boundary case (05/28)
Brian Pierson: Recent federal court rulings affecting Indian law (03/10)
Omaha Tribe welcomes denial of rehearing in boundary lawsuit (03/02)
Dennis Hastings: Omaha tribal sovereignty for 2015 and beyond (12/26)
8th Circuit sides with Omaha Tribe in reservation boundary case (12/19)
Omaha Tribe links incident to dispute over reservation borders (10/08)
Judge backs Omaha Tribe in lawsuit over taxes on non-Indians (02/18)
NCAI backs Omaha Tribe in suit over alcohol tax on businesses (7/11)
Federal judge set to rule on Omaha Tribe's liquor taxation case (02/20)
Omaha Tribe heading back in court in alcohol taxation dispute (2/19