Members of the Omaha Tribe of Nebraska participate in Spiritual Ride on January 16, 2016. Photo from Facebook
The U.S. Supreme Court will hear Nebraska v. Parker, a reservation diminishment case affecting the Omaha Tribe of Nebraska, on Wednesday. The dispute arose after the tribe implemented a liquor tax. Non-Indian businesses in the village of Pender refused to submit because they claim their community was removed from the reservation by an act of Congress in 1882. A federal judge and the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed and sided with the tribe. Those rulings could be overturned by the Supreme Court but Chairman Vernon Miller, who is in Washington, D.C, for the oral arguments, remains confident. “The tribe has always had jurisdiction within the boundaries of the reservation," Miller told Net Nebraska. “Before the state of Nebraska was a state, our tribe has always been here. It has always been our land. The village was founded on a reservation.”
Indianz.Com SoundCloud: 8th Circuit Court of Appeals Oral Arguments in Smith v. Parker
In advance of the hearing, the tribe held a Spiritual Ride on Saturday. Tribal members rode 21 miles from Macy, the location of tribal headquarters, to Pender to show solidarity for the cause. The Lincoln Indian Center in Lincoln is also showing support by burning a sacred flame all day on Wednesday. A sweat will be held later in the afternoon, according to the organization's Facebook page. The court has set aside one hour for arguments. James D. Smith, the Solicitor General of Nebraska, will represent the state and the non-Indian interests.
Members of the Omaha Tribe of Nebraska participate in Spiritual Ride on January 16, 2016. Photo from Facebook
Paul D. Clement, a former Solicitor General of the United States who is now in private practice, will represent the tribal council and will share the argument with Allon Kedem of the Department of Justice. The Obama administration is backing the tribe in the case. The transcript of the argument will be posted by the Supreme Court on Wednesday afternoon. Audio will be posted on Friday. The Supreme Court's last reservation diminishment case was South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe from 1998. In a unanimous decision, the justices held reservation of the Yankton Sioux Tribe was diminished by an act of Congress in 1894. Get the Story:
U.S. Supreme Court to hear arguments of Nebraska tribal land case (Nebraska Radio Network 1/19)
Century-old boundary dispute brings Omaha Tribe before US Supreme Court (Net Nebraska 1/18)
Omaha Tribe travels 21 miles on spiritual ride (KTIV 1/16)
Pender case to go before U.S. Supreme Court (The Norfolk Daily News 1/16) Supreme Court Documents:
Docket Sheet No. 14-1406 | Questions Presented | Hearing List: January 2016 8th Circuit Decision:
Smith v. Parker (December 19, 2014) Federal Court Documents:
Status Report [Includes tribal court decision] | Court Order
Join the Conversation
Related Stories
Mike Myers: Supreme Court ready to cheat Native
people again (1/18) Lyle Denniston: Supreme Court considers Omaha Tribe dispute (1/14)
Matthew Birkhold: Supreme Court to hear reservation dispute (12/21)
Supreme Court schedules oral arguments in Omaha Tribe dispute (12/02)
Supreme Court agrees to hear Omaha Reservation boundary case (10/02)
Supreme Court considers petitions in slew of Indian law cases (09/22)
Obama backs Omaha Tribe in dispute over reservation boundaries (08/24)
Omaha Tribe surprised by appeal in reservation boundary case (05/28)
Brian Pierson: Recent federal court rulings affecting Indian law (03/10)
Omaha Tribe welcomes denial of rehearing in boundary lawsuit (03/02)
Dennis Hastings: Omaha tribal sovereignty for 2015 and beyond (12/26)
8th Circuit sides with Omaha Tribe in reservation boundary case (12/19)
Omaha Tribe links incident to dispute over reservation borders (10/08)
Judge backs Omaha Tribe in lawsuit over taxes on non-Indians (02/18)
NCAI backs Omaha Tribe in suit over alcohol tax on businesses (7/11)
Federal judge set to rule on Omaha Tribe's liquor taxation case (02/20)
Omaha Tribe heading back in court in alcohol taxation dispute (2/19)