Assembling The Monument Quilt at the U.S. Capitol on December 7, 2015. Photo from Quilt Walk for Justice / Facebook
Steven Newcomb of the Indigenous Law Institute thinks the U.S. Supreme Court is prepared to cut back tribal sovereignty as it takes up Dollar General Corporation v. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, a jurisdiction case:
On November 25, 2015, The New York Times published Ned Blackhawk’s op-ed piece “The Struggle for Justice on Tribal Lands.” Blackhawk (Western Shoshone) is a professor of history and American studies at Yale University, and the author of “Violence Over the Land: Indians and Empires in the Early American West.” Blackhawk’s column concerns a case now before the U.S. Supreme Court, Dollar General v. Mississippi Band of Choctaw. The case involves a sexual assault of a Choctaw teenager by a non-Native manager of a Dollar General store operating on the Choctaw reservation. The case centers on the question of whether the court system of an American Indian “tribe” has the jurisdiction to hear a civil case involving a tort (damage) claim by Indians (the parents) against a non-Indian. Blackhawk sets the tone of his article by using the pronoun “we,” as in “we Americans.” He writes: “The Thanksgiving we now celebrate began in partnership” (emphasis added), and thereby frames himself as inside the body politic of the United States. Sadly, this style is becoming more common among Native writers these days. By using the pronoun “we” in that manner Professor Blackhawk is thereby identifying Native people primarily as “Americans” and obscuring the political distinctiveness that has historically existed between Native nations and the United States. Similarly, a November 27 article by Tim Giago (Lakota) (“A Word About Thanksgiving Day” Native Sun News), provides another example of this style of writing: “Native Americans look at Thanksgiving Day differently than other Americans…” (emphasis added). By this style of framing, Giago is saying that “Native Americans” are “Americans,” just a “Native” version of Americans.Get the Story:
Steven Newcomb: Another Impending ‘Amputation’ by the U.S. Supreme Court? (Indian Country Today 12/7)
Supreme Court case draws Tulalip’s attention (The Everett Herald 12/4) Also Today:
Dollar General seeks tribal suit ban in Miss. Choctaw case (AP 12/5)
Join the Conversation
Related Stories:Mike Myers: Tribal jurisdiction opponents flock to Supreme Court (12/04)
Native women schedule Quilt Walk for Justice at Supreme Court (12/01)
Steven Newcomb: Language of domination persists in Indian law (12/1)
Steven Newcomb: Even the media treats our nations as 'nothing' (11/27)
Ned Blackhawk: Supreme Court case jeopardizes tribal rights (11/25)
Peter d'Errico: Anti-Indian wars continue in our Supreme Court (11/24)
Native women to rally at Supreme Court for upcoming case (11/11)
DOJ to help with arguments in Supreme Court jurisdiction case (11/09)
Native women defend tribal jurisdiction in Supreme Court case (10/26)
Tribes urged to bring states on board for Supreme Court case (10/20)
Cheyenne & Arapaho Tribal Tribune: Supreme Court case tests tribal jurisdiction (10/14)
Supreme Court schedules oral arguments in two Indian law cases (10/12)
States oppose tribal jurisdiction in upcoming Supreme Court case (10/07)
Supreme Court rejects petitions in four more Indian law cases (10/05)
Supreme Court agrees to hear Omaha Reservation boundary case (10/02)
Supreme Court considers petitions in slew of Indian law cases (09/22)
Bryan Newland: The racist foundation of Supreme Court rulings (09/08)
Supreme Court agrees to hear first tribal jurisdiction case in years (06/15)
Supreme Court needs more time to review tribal jurisdiction case (6/8)
SCOTUSBlog: DOJ urges denial of petition in tribal court dispute (05/20)
DOJ files brief in tribal jurisdiction case before Supreme Court (5/14)
Updates from National Congress of American Indians DC meeting (2/27)
Updates from National Congress of American Indians winter session (2/26)
Supreme Court asks DOJ for views in Mississippi Choctaw case (10/06)
