Editorial: No room for extremism on Lytton Band land-into-trust


A view of the Lytton Rancheria's land-into-trust site in Sonoma County, California. Photo from Lytton Residential Development Environmental Assessment

California newspaper urges compromise and cooperation over plans by the Lytton Band of Pomo Indians to acquire land in trust for housing, economic development and other projects:
It’s also fair to say that communication with Windsor residents about the details of the project has been poor. It’s regrettable that it’s been six years since the tribe first applied to have 124 acres taken into trust and six months since the county announced a 22-year agreement with the Lyttons and the first public forum for Windsor residents wasn’t held until Aug. 24.

Nevertheless, it’s also true that efforts to prevent tribes from having land taken into trust have largely been fruitless, giving weight to arguments that the county and the town of Windsor are better off trying to work for the best agreement possible with the Lytton tribe. Opponents of the plan dispute that contention as noted in today’s Close to Home (“Future of Lytton tribe land is not inevitable”) on the Forum front. They claim the circumstances surrounding the Lytton band property and history — and a recent Supreme Court decision that limits the ability of some tribes to have land taken into trust — casts doubt on the supposed inevitability of this proposal.

We have our doubts. In any case, history has shown that little comes from staking extreme, no-compromise positions in these disputes.

Get the Story:
Editorial: No room for extremes in tribe debate (The Santa Rosa Press_Democrat 9/6)

Another Opinion:
Michael Robison and Mike Healy: Future of Lytton tribe’s land is not inevitable (The Santa Rosa Press_Democrat 9/6)

Also Today:
Rep. Jared Huffman surprised at opposition to Lytton tribe’s plans near Windsor (The Santa Rosa Press_Democrat 8/29)

Committee Notice:
Legislative Hearing on H.R. 1157, H.R. 2386, H.R. 2538 (June 17, 2015)

Related Stories
Lytton Band faces local opposition to land development projects (08/26)
Lytton Band faces opposition to land-into-trust bill in Congress (07/16)
Lawmakers slam county for poor dealings with Chumash Tribe (06/18)
Witness list for House hearing on tribal and Alaska Native bills (06/17)
House subcommittee sets hearing on tribal and Alaska Native bills (06/15)
Lytton Band plans big developments after reaching agreement (03/11)
Lytton Band enters into land-into-trust agreement with county (03/10)
Lytton Band asks voters to approve utility service to housing site (01/16)
BIA still working on Lytton Band's land-into-trust application (11/07)
Lytton Band offers more to community for land-into-trust bid (11/4)
Lytton Band confident of approval of land-into-trust application (08/06)
Lytton Band donates $1M to bolster land-into-trust application (07/21)
Lytton Band makes $10M deposit in local financial institutions (06/09)
Lytton Band spent over $47M on land acquisitions in two years (12/02)
Lytton Band to pay more than $1M to cover land-into-trust bid (06/27)
Land-into-trust bill in California due for consideration next week (06/14)
County worried about Lytton Band land-into-trust application (07/12)

Join the Conversation