Editorial: Questioning Alaska Native contracts

Wednesday, November 28, 2007  

"Several Alaska Native firms have used generous federal contracting preferences to become prosperous multimillion-dollar enterprises. Some years, the total amount of federal contract payments to Native firms tops $1 billion. Of the 10 biggest Alaska-owned companies in Alaska Business Monthly's 2006 survey, seven were Alaska Native corporations. Federal contracts help those companies pay dividends to their Native shareholders and support charitable causes, often in economically distressed areas of the state.

Clearly, the federal bidding preferences are a good deal for the Native companies, their shareholders and their communities. It's not clear, however, that the American taxpayer is getting a good deal in return.

Case in point: a $475 million, nine-year border security contract, awarded without competitive bidding, to a subsidiary of the Native corporation in the village of Chenega Bay (population 69).

The Native American Contractors Association says "The Native 8(a) program is a rare Federal economic program that works."

As the stunning economic success of some Native corporations has shown, it works for the companies getting the contracts. Whether it works for the people who are paying the bills is a different question.

BOTTOM LINE: No wonder Congress is scrutinizing the federal contracting preferences for Alaska Native corporations."

Get the Story:
Editorial: Contract questions (The Anchorage Daily News 11/28)
pwlat

Relevant Links:
Chenega Technology Services - http://www.chenegatechnology.com
Chenega Corporation - http://www.chenega.com

Related Stories:
Contract improperly awarded to Native firm (11/20)
Alaska Native contracting faces challenges (10/29)
SBA hears from Alaska Native corporations (10/25)
Small businesses worried about Native contracting (9/5)
Native corporations in dispute over federal contract (8/14)
Tex Hall: Contracting under attack in Congress (7/20)
Court opens Alaska Native corporation to suit (5/4)
Opinion: Alaska Natives need tribes not corporations (04/23)
Alaska Native corporations a major force in state (11/15)
Column: Alaska Natives abuse minority contracting (11/13)
Alaska Native contracting program questioned (07/17)
Alaska Native contracting comes under attack (6/22)
House hearing on Alaska Native corporation contracting (6/21)
Court throws out suit challenging Indian preference (4/28)
GAO calls for more oversight of Alaska Native contracts (04/28)
Sen. Stevens defends Alaska Native contracting (04/13)
GAO warns of Alaska Native contract abuse (4/12)
Business Week: Choctaws land shady Katrina contract (4/5)
Alaska Native corporations await GAO report (03/20)
Defense rider targets Alaska Native contracting (4/25)
Opinion: Congressional probe will hurt Indian business (03/21)
Alaska Native corporation contracts under scrutiny (3/7)
Non-Native companies benefit from Native contracting (08/13)
Alaska Native subsidiary wins defense contract (06/29)
Alaska Native subsidiary awarded NASA contract (06/25)
Native firm leases Stevens building for $6M (12/18)
Supreme Court rejects appeal of Native preference case (12/16)
Court rejects union claim against Native contract (06/09)
Native corp close to $2.5B contract (09/09)
Alaska Native deal criticized (6/14)
Native Corp. survives bankruptcy (5/30)