{"id":536427,"date":"2026-05-18T22:33:32","date_gmt":"2026-05-19T03:33:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/?p=536427"},"modified":"2026-05-18T22:34:07","modified_gmt":"2026-05-19T03:34:07","slug":"supreme-court-orders-another-look-at-native-voting-rights-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2026\/05\/18\/supreme-court-orders-another-look-at-native-voting-rights-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court orders another look at Native voting rights case"},"content":{"rendered":"<a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2026\/05\/18\/supreme-court-orders-another-look-at-native-voting-rights-case\/supremecourt-53\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-536983\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"2048\" height=\"1536\" data-attachment-id=\"536983\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2026\/05\/18\/supreme-court-orders-another-look-at-native-voting-rights-case\/supremecourt-53\/\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/19\/SupremeCourt.jpg\" data-orig-size=\"2048,1536\" data-comments-opened=\"0\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"U.S. Supreme Court\" data-image-description=\"&lt;p&gt;The U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. Photo by Indianz.Com &lt;a href=&quot;https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/&quot;&gt;(CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)&lt;\/a&gt;&lt;\/p&gt;\n\" data-image-caption=\"&lt;p&gt;The U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. Photo by Indianz.Com &lt;a href=&quot;https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/&quot;&gt;(CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)&lt;\/a&gt;&lt;\/p&gt;\n\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/19\/SupremeCourt.jpg\" src=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/19\/SupremeCourt.jpg\" alt=\"U.S. Supreme Court\"   class=\"size-full wp-image-536983\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"figure-caption\"> The U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. Photo by Indianz.Com <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">(CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)<\/a><\/figcaption>\r\n<div class=\"h3-responsive font-weight-bold\">Supreme Court orders another look at Native voting rights case<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"date\">Monday, May 18, 2026<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"byline\">By Acee Agoyo<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"source\">Indianz.Com<\/div>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nThe <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/\">U.S. Supreme Court<\/a> continues to upend the voting rights landscape amid a crucial election cycle that already has tribes and their advocates worried about their power at the polls.\r\n<P><\/P>\r\nThis time, the highest court in the land finally took action on a long-delayed Native voting rights case from North Dakota. In an <a href=https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/051826zor_h315\/>order on Monday<\/a>, the justices gave new life to a dispute in which tribes and tribal citizens are <a href=\"https:\/\/narf.org\/cases\/north-dakota-redistricting-map\/\">challenging a legislative map<\/a> that they say is illegal.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nBut unlike a recent decision that has Native advocates reeling, the move in \r\n<a href=https:\/\/sct.narf.org\/caseindexes\/turtle_mountain_v_howe.html><EM>Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians v. Howe<\/EM><\/a> is being seen as a positive. Attorneys representing tribal plaintiffs are hoping to prove they are right when the case returns to the <a href=https:\/\/www.ca8.uscourts.gov\/>Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals<\/a> for further litigation.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n\u201cThe Supreme Court was correct to vacate the Eighth Circuit\u2019s decision, which wrongly prevented Native voters and Tribal Nations from vindicating their rights under the Voting Rights Act,&#8221;   Lenny Powell, a staff attorney with the <a href=https:\/\/www.narf.org\/>Native American Rights Fund<\/a> (NARF), said in a news release on Monday.\r\n<P><\/p>\r\n&#8220;On remand, we will keep fighting to ensure that Native voters have the ability to vote and effect change in their communities,\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/narf.org\/tmc-voting-rights\/\">said Powell<\/a>, who is a citizen of the Hopland Band of Pomo Indians.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/plugins\/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FNativeAmericanRightsFund%2Fposts%2Fpfbid0fvNtWxndDsFVYg3auwQXKGKA6VBdsWGSbuccKRRR268afrQ11tNBexUmiYWpeMeBl&#038;show_text=true&#038;width=500\" width=\"500\" height=\"666\" style=\"border:none;overflow:hidden\" scrolling=\"no\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"true\" allow=\"autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; picture-in-picture; web-share\"><\/iframe>\r\n<P><\/P>\r\nThe order comes more than eight months after the Native plaintiffs in <EM>Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians v. Howe<\/EM> formally asked the Supreme Court to take up the case. The <a href=https:\/\/tmchippewa.com\/>Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians<\/a>, the <a href=https:\/\/www.spiritlakenation.com\/>Spirit Lake Nation<\/a> and individual tribal voters argued that the Eighth Circuit got it wrong by limiting their ability to sue under the <a href=https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965>Voting Rights Act<\/a>, a civil rights era law that has faced renewed scrutiny from Republican politicians.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nBut instead of taking action on the petition in <em>Howe<\/em>, the Supreme Court kept delaying consideration, all without providing an explanation even though briefing was completed back in October 2025 for <a href=https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/search.aspx?filename=\/docket\/DocketFiles\/html\/Public\/25-253.html>Docket No. 25-253<\/a>.\r\n<P><\/P>\r\nMeanwhile, <a href=https:\/\/soundcloud.com\/indianz\/sets\/u-s-supreme-court-louisiana-v>the justices heard<\/a> and decided <a href=https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Louisiana_v._Callais><em>Louisiana v. Callais<\/em><\/a>, a closely watched case from Louisiana. Last month,  the court &#8212; by a vote of 6 to 3 &#8212;   gutted the protections of the Voting Rights Act, according to NARF and the <a href=https:\/\/www.ncai.org\/>National Congress of American Indians<\/a> (NCAI).\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n&#8220;When a Tribal Nation or Native American community\u2019s political voice is diluted, so is its ability to secure good schools, adequate infrastructure, health care access, environmental protections, and economic opportunity, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncai.org\/news\/scotus-ruling-guts-voter-protections\">NCAI and NARF said in a joint statement<\/a> on April 29. &#8220;Taking away voting protections, like what happened with today\u2019s decision, makes it harder and at times impossible for Native voters to elect representatives who will respond to their needs.&#8221;\r\n<P><\/P>\r\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/plugins\/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fncai1944%2Fposts%2Fpfbid021FkK9xQVicbCnraRMFE66w63SjhEmauyv83UJVunv67F5vuqjZbwwhxXwGqY5kR6l&#038;show_text=true&#038;width=500\" width=\"500\" height=\"729\" style=\"border:none;overflow:hidden\" scrolling=\"no\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"true\" allow=\"autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; picture-in-picture; web-share\"><\/iframe>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nIn North Dakota, tribes and tribal voters argue that their voice has been weakened by the contested legislative map. Historically, Turtle Mountain and Spirit Lake voters have been able to send three candidates of their choice to the State Legislature, <a href=https:\/\/campaignlegal.org\/cases-actions\/fighting-fair-representation-under-voting-rights-act-native-american-voters-turtle>according to the Campaign Legal Center<\/a>, a non-partisan group that is also part of the litigation.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nBut immediately following the adoption of the map in 2021, Native voters in the northeastern part of the state were only able to elect one of their preferred candidates to the North Dakota House instead of the usual two. And none were elected to the North Dakota Senate where in the past there had been one chosen.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nThe landscape began to change as a result of the litigation. In January 2024, a court-ordered map was implemented and later in the year, Turtle Mountain and Spirit Lake voters elected three of their preferred candidates. Elsewhere in the state, voters from the <a href=https:\/\/www.mhanation.com\/>Mandan, Hidatsa  and Arikara Nation<\/a> retained their preferred candidate.\r\n<P><\/P>\r\nThe picture  shifted yet again following an appeal by the state of North Dakota. In May 2025, the Eighth Circuit ruled that private parties &#8212; such as tribes and individual Native voters &#8212; cannot bring a lawsuit to enforce the Voting Rights Act.\r\n<P><\/P>\r\n<div class=\"embed-responsive embed-responsive-16by9\">\r\n<span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"youtube-player\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/ZZUBzv0BtxU?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;fs=1&#038;hl=en-US&#038;autohide=2&#038;wmode=transparent\" allowfullscreen=\"true\" style=\"border:0;\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-presentation allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox\"><\/iframe><\/span>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<figcaption class=\"figure-caption\">\r\nNative American Rights Fund: <a href=https:\/\/youtu.be\/ZZUBzv0BtxU>The 60th anniversary of the Voting Rights Act<\/a>\r\n<\/figcaption>\r\n<P><\/P>\r\nAs a result, the Native plaintiffs weren&#8217;t able to explain why the contested legislative map was discriminatory and wouldn&#8217;t be able to do so whenever future disagreements arise.  But with Monday&#8217;s action by the Supreme Court, the Eighth Circuit&#8217;s ruling was vacated, or set aside, giving the tribes and tribal voters another shot at proving how their power is being diluted based on race.\r\n<P><\/P>\r\n\u201cToday, the Supreme Court agreed that courts cannot slam the courthouse doors on plaintiffs seeking equal representation,&#8221; said Mark Gaber, senior director for <a href=https:\/\/campaignlegal.org\/issues\/redistricting>redistricting  at the Campaign Legal Center<\/a>. \u201cWe will keep fighting to defend the rights of Native American voters.\u201d\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nStill,   the <em>Callais<\/em> decision &#8212; which has been widely condemned by Democrats and civil rights advocates &#8212; looms large. Monday&#8217;s order specifically states that  North Dakota voting map dispute  is being &#8220;remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further\r\nconsideration in light of <em>Louisiana v. Callais<\/em>.&#8221;\r\n<P><\/p>\r\nAs is usual practice, the order did not offer any details for why the justices took such action in <em>Howe<\/em>. But a hint of what&#8217;s going on behind the scenes arose thanks to <a href=https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ketanji_Brown_Jackson>Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson<\/a>, who is the first African American woman on the Supreme Court.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nIn a three-sentence dissent, Jackson pointed out that <em>Callais<\/em> had nothing to do with the issue in <em>Howe<\/em> &#8212; whether private parties can sue under <a href=Calling>Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act<\/a>. &#8220;Thus I see no basis for vacating the lower court\u2019s judgment,&#8221; she wrote on Monday.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nRather, Jackson pointed to the Supreme Court&#8217;s precedent in <em>Morse v. Republican Party of Virginia<\/em>. In 1996, the justices &#8212; by a vote of 5 to 4 &#8212; <a href=https:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/1995\/94-203>agreed that private parties can indeed sue<\/a>  under the Voting Rights Act.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n&#8220;Instead, in light of <em>Morse v. Republican Party of Va.<\/em>, 517 U. S. 186 (1996), I would summarily reverse,&#8221; Jackson wrote in the final sentence of her dissent, asserting that the Eighth Circuit&#8217;s decision in <em>Howe<\/em> is wrong in light of the decades-old precedent.\r\n<P><\/P>\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2026\/05\/18\/supreme-court-orders-another-look-at-native-voting-rights-case\/051826zor_h315-2\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-536989\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"2003\" height=\"1335\" data-attachment-id=\"536989\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2026\/05\/18\/supreme-court-orders-another-look-at-native-voting-rights-case\/051826zor_h315-2\/\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/19\/051826zor_h315.jpg\" data-orig-size=\"2003,1335\" data-comments-opened=\"0\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"051826zor_h315\" data-image-description=\"&lt;p&gt;Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians v. Howe&lt;\/p&gt;\n\" data-image-caption=\"&lt;p&gt;U.S. Supreme Court order in Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians v. Howe, No. 25-253. Dated May 18, 2026.&lt;\/p&gt;\n\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/19\/051826zor_h315.jpg\" src=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/19\/051826zor_h315.jpg\" alt=\"Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians v. Howe\"  class=\"size-full wp-image-536989\" \/><\/a> <figcaption class=\"figure-caption\">The U.S. Supreme Court took action in   <em>Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians v. Howe<\/em>, a Native voting rights case, on  May 18, 2026.<\/figcaption><P><\/P>\r\nJackson offered a similar rationale in connection with another voting rights matter that the Supreme Court had kept in limbo for several months. In an order on Monday, the justices  directed the federal court for the Southern District of Mississippi to take another look at a case known  as <a href=https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/search.aspx?filename=\/docket\/DocketFiles\/html\/Public\/25-234.html><em>Board of Election Commissioner v. NAACP<\/em><\/a>.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n Jackson, who was nominated by former president Joe Biden, was in the minority for <em>Callais<\/em>.  Along with <a href=https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Sonia_Sotomayor>Justice Sonia Sotomayor<\/a>,  she joined a dissent authored by <a href=https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Elena_Kagan>Justice Elena Kagan<\/a> that criticized the &#8220;gutting&#8221; of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. All three jurists were nominated by Democratic presidents.\r\n<P><\/P>\r\n&#8220;Under the Court\u2019s new view of Section 2, a state can, without legal consequence, systematically dilute minority citizens\u2019 voting power,&#8221; Kagan wrote in the dissent on April 29.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nThe six justices who voted to limit the reach of the Voting Rights Act in <em>Callais<\/em> were nominated by Republican presidents. Three of them were chosen by President Donald Trump, whose highest-ranking Supreme Court attorney recently struggled to explain whether <a href=https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2026\/04\/01\/im-not-sure-trump-attorney-stumbles-on-american-indian-citizenship-questions\/>American Indians are birthright citizens of the United States<\/a>.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n&#8220;The Voting Rights Act is a fundamental promise of fair representation, but under this Supreme Court and Republicans in Congress, that promise is being undermined at every turn,&#8221; said <a href=https:\/\/www.lujan.senate.gov\/>Sen. Ben Ray Luj\u00e1n<\/a> (D-New Mexico), who serves on the <a href=https:\/\/indian.senate.gov\/>Senate Committee on Indian Affairs<\/a>.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<div class=\"embed-responsive embed-responsive-16by9\">\r\n<span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"youtube-player\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/WsB-jj4VxbA?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;fs=1&#038;hl=en-US&#038;autohide=2&#038;wmode=transparent\" allowfullscreen=\"true\" style=\"border:0;\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-presentation allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox\"><\/iframe><\/span>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<figcaption class=\"figure-caption\">\r\nNative American Rights Fund: <a href=https:\/\/youtu.be\/WsB-jj4VxbA>Tribal Supreme Court Project Celebrates 25 Years<\/a>\r\n<\/figcaption>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nRegardless of the leanings of the justices, tribes and their advocates have long worried about going to the Supreme Court &#8212; because they frequently have been at the losing end of the stick. Between 2006 and 2016, for instance, a period that coincided with the arrival of <a href=https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/John_Roberts>Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.<\/a>, tribes lost 9 out of 11 cases.\r\n<P><\/P>\r\n&#8220;This court is a court that is willing and able to rewrite everything &#8212;  including the foundations of federal Indian law as we know it,&#8221;   Melody McCoy, a senior staff attorney at NARF, said during NCAI&#8217;s executive council winter session in Washington, D.C., earlier this year.\r\n<P><\/P>\r\nNARF and NCAI formed the <a href=https:\/\/sct.narf.org\/>Tribal Supreme Court Project<\/a> in 2001 to address the dismal win-loss rate that was seen at the time. McCoy, who is a citizen of the Cherokee Nation, said the initiative has led to some notable successes over the last two decades.\r\n<P><\/P>\r\n&#8220;We&#8217;ve kind of flipped the record &#8212; so in the last decade, tribes have won 70 percent of your cases in the U.S. Supreme Court,&#8221; McCoy said at NCAI&#8217;s meeting on February 11.\r\n<P><\/P>\r\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\"><p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">\u201cWe still need to do more\u201d: Melody McCoy currently leads the Tribal Supreme Court Project. <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/NCAI1944?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@NCAI1944<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/NDNrights?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@NDNRights<\/a> are celebrating 25th anniversary of initiative to help tribes with Supreme Court cases. Anniversary report coming later this year. <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/DC?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#DC<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/5HFILMVAwx\">pic.twitter.com\/5HFILMVAwx<\/a><\/p>&mdash; indianz.com (@indianz) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/indianz\/status\/2021612895520326032?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">February 11, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><P><\/P>\r\nMcCoy also pointed out that the justices haven&#8217;t heard any Indian law cases for two terms in a row. But she warned that dangers remain for tribes and their citizens when it comes to their fundamental rights.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n&#8220;We have a court that is still very hostile to  tribal sovereignty,&#8221; said McCoy, attributing it to &#8220;some members&#8221; of the court.\r\n<P><\/P>\r\n&#8220;We have other members who are very appreciative of tribal sovereignty, but it&#8217;s really, you know, a wild card with this court,&#8221; McCoy added.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nAs the <em>Howe<\/em> case continues, NARF and NCAI are observing a major milestone of the Tribal Supreme Court Project. In March, the two organizations released a <a href=https:\/\/sct.narf.org\/updatememos\/tscp-25-year-report.pdf>25th anniversary report<\/a>  that cited the reversal of the win-loss record. A celebration is scheduled to take place September 17-18 in Washington, D.C.\r\n<p><\/p> \r\n<div class=\"h4-responsive\">Related Stories<\/div><div class=\"related-story\"><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2026\/05\/14\/native-america-callling-native-american-voting-rights-advocates-brace-for-diminished-native-power-at-the-polls\/\" title=\"Native America Calling: Native American voting rights advocates brace for diminished Native power at the polls\">Native America Calling: Native American voting rights advocates brace for diminished Native power at the polls<\/a> (May 14, 2026)<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"related-story\"><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2026\/04\/01\/im-not-sure-trump-attorney-stumbles-on-american-indian-citizenship-questions\/\" title=\"\u2018I\u2019m not sure\u2019: Trump attorney stumbles on American Indian citizenship questions\">\u2018I\u2019m not sure\u2019: Trump attorney stumbles on American Indian citizenship questions<\/a> (April 1, 2026)<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"related-story\"><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2026\/03\/25\/theres-nothing-more-important-secretary-mullin-pushes-controversial-voting-bill-despite-native-objections\/\" title=\"\u2018There\u2019s nothing more important\u2019: Secretary Mullin pushes controversial voting bill despite Native objections\">\u2018There\u2019s nothing more important\u2019: Secretary Mullin pushes controversial voting bill despite Native objections<\/a> (March 25, 2026)<\/div><div class=\"related-story\"><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2025\/11\/19\/not-voting-is-still-a-vote-native-turnout-drops-amid-changes-in-political-winds\/\" title=\"\u2018Not voting is still a vote\u2019: Native turnout drops amid changes in political winds\">\u2018Not voting is still a vote\u2019: Native turnout drops amid changes in political winds<\/a> (November 19, 2025)<\/div><div class=\"related-story\"><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2025\/10\/06\/supreme-court-rejects-indian-law-cases-amid-u-s-government-shutdown\/\" title=\"Supreme Court rejects Indian law cases amid U.S. government shutdown\">Supreme Court rejects Indian law cases amid U.S. government shutdown<\/a> (October 6, 2025)<\/div><div class=\"related-story\"><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2024\/10\/28\/chuck-hoskin-cherokee-nation-gets-out-the-native-vote\/\" title=\"Chuck Hoskin: Cherokee Nation gets out the Native vote\">Chuck Hoskin: Cherokee Nation gets out the Native vote<\/a> (October 28, 2024)<\/div><div class=\"related-story\"><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2024\/06\/08\/cronkite-news-indian-citizenship-law-hits-century-milestone\/\" title=\"Cronkite News: Indian citizenship law hits century milestone\">Cronkite News: Indian citizenship law hits century milestone<\/a> (June 8, 2024)<\/div><div class=\"related-story\"><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2023\/10\/12\/few-states-make-the-grade-when-it-comes-to-tribal-inclusion-in-voting-maps\/\" title=\"Few states make the grade when it comes to tribal inclusion in voting maps\">Few states make the grade when it comes to tribal inclusion in voting maps<\/a> (October 12, 2023)<\/div><div class=\"related-story\"><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/10\/27\/business-meeting-to-consider-h-r-1688-oversight-hearing-on-voting-matters-in-native-communities\/\" title=\"Business Meeting to consider H.R.1688 and Oversight Hearing on \u201cVoting Matters in Native Communities\u201d\">Business Meeting to consider H.R.1688 and Oversight Hearing on \u201cVoting Matters in Native Communities\u201d<\/a> (October 27, 2021)<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The U.S. Supreme Court continues to upend the voting rights landscape amid a crucial election cycle that already has tribes and their advocates worried about their power at the polls.","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":536983,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"_vp_format_video_url":"","_vp_image_focal_point":[],"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[20,13,1,14],"tags":[6667,935,370,7464,94,1554,75,56,2380,53,744,2702,6572,7463,3067,963,685,8,55,7,167,302,47,85,213,661,1630,84,5772,177],"class_list":["post-536427","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-indian-trust","category-law","category-national","category-politics","tag-6667","tag-8th-circuit","tag-ben-ray-lujan","tag-campaign-legal-center","tag-democrats","tag-discrimination","tag-donald-trump","tag-elections","tag-elena-kagan","tag-joe-biden","tag-john-roberts","tag-ketanji-brown-jackson","tag-lenny-powell","tag-mark-gaber","tag-melody-mccoy","tag-mha-nation","tag-mississippi","tag-narf","tag-native-vote","tag-ncai","tag-new-mexico","tag-north-dakota","tag-race","tag-republicans","tag-scia","tag-sonia-sotomayor","tag-spirit-lake","tag-supreme-court","tag-turtle-mountain","tag-voting-rights","no-wpautop"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/19\/SupremeCourt.jpg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pcoJ7g-2fy3","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/536427","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=536427"}],"version-history":[{"count":27,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/536427\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":537039,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/536427\/revisions\/537039"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/536983"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=536427"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=536427"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=536427"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}