{"id":3269,"date":"2020-10-20T10:52:12","date_gmt":"2020-10-20T15:52:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.indianz.com\/News\/?p=3269"},"modified":"2020-10-20T10:52:12","modified_gmt":"2020-10-20T15:52:12","slug":"cronkite-news-supreme-court-to-hear-trump-border-wall-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2020\/10\/20\/cronkite-news-supreme-court-to-hear-trump-border-wall-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Cronkite News: Supreme Court to hear Trump border wall case"},"content":{"rendered":"<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"2100\" height=\"1500\" data-attachment-id=\"3270\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2020\/10\/20\/cronkite-news-supreme-court-to-hear-trump-border-wall-case\/border-barrier-construction-yuma\/\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/borderwall.jpg\" data-orig-size=\"2100,1500\" data-comments-opened=\"0\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;14&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, So&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;Canon EOS 7D Mark II&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;U.S. Army Corps of Engineers South Pacific Border District contractor crews place a three-ton, 30-foot barrier panel at the Barry M. Goldwater Range along the U.S.-Mexico border near Yuma, Arizona, Sept. 25. USACE is providing direction and oversight for Department of Defense-funded construction of border barrier projects from California to Texas. These projects are being executed by USACE, as directed through the U.S. Army by the Secretary of Defense, in response to the Presidential national emergency declaration dated Feb. 15, 2019, requiring the use of the armed forces and authorizing the use of Section 2808 of Title 10, U.S. Code. (Some personal and corporate identifiable markings have been masked for privacy reasons. No one in this photo crossed the international border.)&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;1601006400&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;Public Domain&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;24&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;500&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0.002&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Border Barrier Construction: Yuma&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"Border Barrier Construction: Yuma\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"&lt;p&gt;U.S. Army Corps of Engineers South Pacific Border District contractor crews place a three-ton, 30-foot barrier panel at the Barry M. Goldwater Range along the U.S.-Mexico border near Yuma, Arizona, Sept. 25. USACE is providing direction and oversight for Department of Defense-funded construction of border barrier projects from California to Texas. These projects are being executed by USACE, as directed through the U.S. Army by the Secretary of Defense, in response to the Presidential national emergency declaration dated Feb. 15, 2019, requiring the use of the armed forces and authorizing the use of Section 2808 of Title 10, U.S. Code. (Some personal and corporate identifiable markings have been masked for privacy reasons. No one in this photo crossed the international border.)&lt;\/p&gt;\n\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/borderwall-1024x731.jpg\" src=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/borderwall.jpg\" alt=\"Border Barrier Construction: Yuma\"   class=\"img-fluid wp-image-3270\" \/>\r\n<figcaption class=\"figure-caption\">U.S. Army Corps of Engineers South Pacific Border District contractor crews place a three-ton, 30-foot barrier panel at the Barry M. Goldwater Range along the U.S.-Mexico border near Yuma, Arizona, on September 25, 2020. Photo: <a href=https:\/\/www.dvidshub.net\/image\/6384781\/border-barrier-construction-yuma>Orville Collins  \/  U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Pacific Border District<\/a> <\/figcaption>\r\n<div class=\"h3-responsive font-weight-bold\">Supreme Court to hear Trump plan to use Pentagon funds for border wall<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"date\">Tuesday, October 20, 2020<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"byline\">By Claire Chandler<\/div>\r\n<DIV class=source>Cronkite News<\/DIV>\r\n<DIV class=source-website><A \r\nhref=\"https:\/\/cronkitenews.azpbs.org\/\">cronkitenews.azpbs.org<\/A><\/DIV>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nWASHINGTON &#8211; The Supreme Court said Monday it will consider whether the Trump administration can use an emergency declaration to divert $2.5 billion on Defense Department funds to construct the southern border wall.<p><\/p>\r\nTwo lower courts have rejected the administration&#8217;s argument, agreeing with opponents who argue that the emergency declaration was meant to bypass Congress and is unconstitutional, rulings the administration is challenging.<p><\/p>\r\n\r\nBoth sides welcomed Monday&#8217;s announcement that the high court would hear \r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scotusblog.com\/case-files\/cases\/trump-v-sierra-club-2\/\">the case.<\/a>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n&#8220;This gives us a chance to go to the highest court of the land and tell them why transferring this money was unlawful, as the other courts have said, but also to talk about the reasons why a border wall is so harmful for our communities,&#8221; said Vicki Gaubeca, director of the Southern Border Communities Coalition, one of two groups that sued to block the wall funding<p><\/p>\r\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\"><p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">TAKING IT TO THE COURTS (AGAIN)! Today, the Supreme Court announced it will hear arguments challenging Trump\u2019s use of military spending on his vanity wall. The lawsuit was brought by the <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/ACLU?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@ACLU<\/a> on behalf of our partners <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/SierraClub?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@SierraClub<\/a> and us, SBCC. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/mbRcvzPTnx\">https:\/\/t.co\/mbRcvzPTnx<\/a><\/p>&mdash; SBCC (@SBCCoalition) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/SBCCoalition\/status\/1318303249196183552?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">October 19, 2020<\/a><\/blockquote><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nBut Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Prescott, defended the funding shift, saying in a statement Monday that &#8220;protecting the border and our national sovereignty is a core and fundamental purpose of the military.&#8221;<p><\/p>\r\n&#8220;The allocation of Defense money to defend the national borders is 100% constitutional and consistent with congressional intent,&#8221; Gosar said. &#8220;The American people need and deserve a secure border. They\u2019re getting one from this administration.<p><\/p>\r\nNo date has been set for a hearing on the case, but the court&#8217;s calendar is already full through the end of this year. But it will not be the first time the high court has considered the issue: The Supreme Court previously blocked the lower courts&#8217; orders, allowing wall construction to proceed while the case worked its way through the courts.<p><\/p>\r\nThe dispute over border wall funding began in late 2018, when Congress refused to give Trump billions for border wall construction and he refused to sign the budget, a standoff that led to a 45-day partial government shutdown.<p><\/p>\r\n\r\nThe shutdown ended in February 2019, when Congress agreed to allocate $1.375 billion for limited border wall projects. But immediately after signing that budget, Trump declared a \r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/presidential-actions\/presidential-proclamation-declaring-national-emergency-concerning-southern-border-united-states\/\">national emergency<\/a>\r\nat the border that he said authorized the transfer of up to $8.1 billion from other government sources to fund border wall projects.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<div class=\"embed-responsive embed-responsive-16by9\"><iframe \" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/QChXZVXVLKo\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\r\n<figcaption class=\"figure-caption\">Tohono O&#8217;odham Nation: <a href=https:\/\/www.indianz.com\/Video\/2017\/02\/19\/theres-no-oodham-word-for-wall.asp>&#8216;There&#8217;s No O&#8217;odham Word for Wall&#8217;<\/a>\r\n<\/figcaption>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nThe Southern Border Communities Coalition and \r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sierraclub.org\/press-releases\/2020\/10\/sierra-club-statement-supreme-court-hearing-arguments-border-wall-case\">the Sierra Club<\/a>\r\nquickly filed suit, claiming Trump&#8217;s use of emergency powers was an unconstitutional attempt to bypass Congress.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n\r\nA federal district court agreed and in June 2020 \r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov\/datastore\/opinions\/2020\/06\/26\/19-16102.pdf\">a divided panel<\/a>\r\nof the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the lower court&#8217;s ruling that transferring $2.5 billion in Defense Department funds originally budgeted for military pay and pensions was unlawful.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n&#8220;We all learned in our basic civics education that Congress has the power of the purse, and that is definitely something that the administration has not acknowledged,&#8221; said Sandy Bahr, director of the Sierra Club Grand Canyon Chapter.<p><\/p>\r\nEven though Congress set a specific limit on wall funding, the administration said, &#8220;&#8216;OK, well, we&#8217;ll just take this money and do it anyway,&#8217;&#8221; Bahr said. &#8220;That is contrary to the separation of powers outlined in the U.S. Constitution.&#8221;<p><\/p>\r\nBut Ira Mehlman, media director for the Federation for American Immigration Reform, said the money is being used properly, as the Pentagon funds would be used for border protection.<p><\/p>\r\n&#8220;It&#8217;s not like they&#8217;re pulling this out of the Education Department or the Commerce Department&#8217;s budget,&#8221; Mehlman said. &#8220;This is legitimately going to be used for \u2026 the security of the country, because when you have borders that are open, it&#8217;s not just people who are coming here to work illegally, but potentially people who are coming here to do harm to this country.&#8221;<p><\/p><div class=\"mt-1 mb-1\"><ins class=\"adsbygoogle\" style=\"display:block; text-align:center;\" data-ad-layout=\"in-article\" data-ad-format=\"fluid\" data-ad-client=\"ca-pub-8411603009680747\" data-ad-slot=\"6394965691\"><\/ins><script>(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/script><\/div><p><\/p>\r\nWhile conservation groups have criticized the wall&#8217;s environmental impact, saying it will disrupt threatened ecosystems and that construction will harm endangered species, Mehlman argues the opposite. He said that migrants crossing the border have a greater impact on the environment than construction crews do or a wall would.<p><\/p>\r\nBahr calls that argument a &#8220;distraction from the real harm that is being done&#8221; by the wall: &#8220;Harm to the Constitution, the harm to the lands, to our waters, to communities, to people to wildlife to sacred areas, important for cultural values.&#8221;<p><\/p>\r\n\r\nThe Supreme Court also said Monday that it will hear the Trump \r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scotusblog.com\/case-files\/cases\/wolf-v-innovation-law-lab-2\/\">administration&#8217;s defense<\/a>\r\nof its Migrant Protection Protocols, a policy that requires asylum-seekers at the southern border to wait in Mexico while their cases are pending. The 9th Circuit had blocked the \r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dhs.gov\/news\/2019\/01\/24\/migrant-protection-protocols\">&#8220;remain in Mexico&#8221;<\/a>\r\npolicy.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nGaubeca said she hopes the two cases start a conversation on what borders should look like.<p><\/p>\r\n&#8220;There is a need to rethink borders to create a new, more welcoming border,&#8221; she said. &#8220;We&#8217;re hopeful that both of these cases will start speaking to that new new border governance model that we have been aspiring to for a while now.&#8221;<p><\/p>\r\n<STRONG>For more stories from Cronkite News, visit <A href=\"https:\/\/cronkitenews.azpbs.org\/?utm_source=referral&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=client\">cronkitenews.azpbs.org<\/A>.<\/STRONG>\r\n<P><\/P>\r\n<HR><EM>Note: This story originally <a href=\"https:\/\/cronkitenews.azpbs.org\/2020\/10\/19\/supreme-court-to-hear-trump-plan-to-use-pentagon-funds-for-border-wall\">appeared on Cronkite News<\/a>.  It  is published via a <A href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/\">Creative  Commons license<\/A>. Cronkite News is produced by the <A href=\"https:\/\/cronkite.asu.edu\/\">Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication<\/A> at <A href=\"https:\/\/www.asu.edu\">Arizona State University<\/A>.<\/EM><HR>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Can President Trump use military funds for the wall along the U.S. border? The Supreme Court is set to decide.","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3270,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"_vp_format_video_url":"","_vp_image_focal_point":[],"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,13,1,14],"tags":[468,214,42,45,46,698,75,697,151,224,84],"class_list":["post-3269","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-environment","category-law","category-national","category-politics","tag-9th-circuit","tag-appropriations","tag-arizona","tag-borders","tag-cronkite-news","tag-defense","tag-donald-trump","tag-immigration","tag-paul-gosar","tag-shutdown","tag-supreme-court","no-wpautop"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/borderwall.jpg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pcoJ7g-QJ","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3269","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3269"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3269\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3270"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3269"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3269"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3269"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}