{"id":2341,"date":"2020-10-08T08:27:53","date_gmt":"2020-10-08T13:27:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.indianz.com\/News\/?p=2341"},"modified":"2020-10-08T08:57:21","modified_gmt":"2020-10-08T13:57:21","slug":"peter-derrico-racist-indian-law-doctrine-springs-into-action","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2020\/10\/08\/peter-derrico-racist-indian-law-doctrine-springs-into-action\/","title":{"rendered":"Peter d&#8217;Errico: Racist Indian law doctrine springs into action"},"content":{"rendered":"<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"2560\" height=\"1707\" data-attachment-id=\"2358\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2020\/10\/08\/peter-derrico-racist-indian-law-doctrine-springs-into-action\/kevinstitt\/\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/kevinstitt-scaled.jpg\" data-orig-size=\"2560,1707\" data-comments-opened=\"0\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;2.8&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;shealah_craighead&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;ILCE-9M2&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;1592494834&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;official_white_house_photo&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;159&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;4000&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0.00625&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"Kevin Stitt\" data-image-description=\"&lt;p&gt;Kevin Stitt&lt;\/p&gt;\n\" data-image-caption=\"&lt;p&gt;Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt (R). Photo: Shealah Craighead \/ White House&lt;\/p&gt;\n\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/kevinstitt-1024x683.jpg\" src=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/kevinstitt-scaled.jpg\" alt=\"kevinstitt\"  class=\"alignnone img-fluid wp-image-2358\" \/>\r\n<figcaption class=\"figure-caption\">Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt (R), a citizen of the Cherokee Nation, is seen at the White House on June 18, 2020. A month later, he was asking the Trump administration for regulatory authority over Indian Country in Oklahoma. Photo: <a href=https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/whitehouse\/50022567838\/>Shealah Craighead \/ White House<\/a>\r\n<\/figcaption>\r\n<div class=\"h3-responsive font-weight-bold\">McGirt, Oklahoma, and the EPA<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"h5-responsive sub\">Federal anti-Indian Law in Action<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"date\">Thursday, October 8, 2020<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"byline\"> By Peter d&#8217;Errico<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"source-links\"><a href=https:\/\/blogs.umass.edu\/derrico\/>umass.edu\/derrico<\/a><\/div>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nSo much hoopla surrounded the <a href=\"https:\/\/supreme.justia.com\/cases\/federal\/us\/591\/18-9526\/\"><em>McGirt v. Oklahoma<\/em> <\/a>decision that few people could see what the case really decided.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nThe decision said the Creek Nation was \u201cIndian country\u201d as defined in federal law and that Oklahoma had no jurisdiction over crimes committed by Native persons in Creek territory. Lots of people were thrilled to read Justice Neil Gorsuch\u2019s opening line, \u201cOn the far end of the Trail of Tears was a promise.\u201d\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nThe temptation was great to think&nbsp;<em>McGirt<\/em> closed the door on the genocidal era of \u201cIndian Removal.\u201d But <em>McGirt<\/em> didn\u2019t close that door. In the language of federal Indian law, when it said Creek lands are part of \u201cIndian country\u201d it meant they are subject to the US&nbsp;<em>Major Crimes Act<\/em>. That was the legal question in the case.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nDespite the hoopla about a \u201clandmark decision,\u201d <em><strong>McGirt<\/strong><\/em> <strong>did<\/strong> <strong>not transform federal Indian law<\/strong>. In fact, <em>McGirt<\/em> upheld the key federal Indian law doctrine of U.S. domination over Native nations and peoples \u2014 the doctrine called \u201ccongressional plenary power.\u201d It said the Creek Nation existed because Congress had not (yet) \u201cdisestablished\u201d it.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<figure>\r\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"2500\" height=\"1667\" data-attachment-id=\"2360\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2020\/10\/08\/peter-derrico-racist-indian-law-doctrine-springs-into-action\/andrewwheeler\/\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/andrewwheeler.jpg\" data-orig-size=\"2500,1667\" data-comments-opened=\"0\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;4.5&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;ILCE-9&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;1568129920&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;158&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;5000&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0.0025&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"andrewwheeler\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/andrewwheeler-1024x683.jpg\" src=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/andrewwheeler.jpg\" alt=\"andrewwheeler\" class=\"alignnone img-fluid wp-image-2360\" \/>\r\n<figcaption class=\"figure-caption\">Andrew Wheeler serves as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency. Photo: <a href=https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/whitehouse\/48714060408\/>Andrea Hanks \/ White House<\/a>\r\n<\/figcaption>\r\n<\/figure>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nAs the majority opinion itself pointed out, it was reaffirming the \u201cplenary power\u201d claim of US domination asserted by the Supreme Court \u201clong ago\u201d:\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<div class=\"mx-4\"><em>This Court long ago held that the Legislature [Congress] wields significant constitutional authority when it comes to tribal relations, possessing even the authority to breach its own promises and treaties.&nbsp;<\/em><\/div>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nThe majority and dissent in <em>McGirt<\/em> were in agreement about this fundamental point of law. They both said the US Congress can do as it wishes with Native nations, peoples, and lands. The only difference between the majority and dissent was whether Congress had or had not \u201cdisestablished\u201d the Creek nation. The dissent said yes. The majority said no.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nTo make the fundamental point clear, the majority said Congress could do the dirty deed whenever it wished:\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<div class=\"mx-4\">\u2026<em>of course, \u2026Congress remains free to [take action]\u2026 about the lands in question at any time. It has no shortage of tools at its disposal.<\/em><\/div>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nAnyone who reads the decision can see this, even with rose-colored glasses.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\"><p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Muscogee (Creek) Nation statement on Trump administration&#39;s decision to cede regulatory authority in Indian Country to state of <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Oklahoma?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Oklahoma<\/a>.<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/GovStitt?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@GovStitt<\/a> Kevin Stitt (R) asked <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/EPA?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@EPA<\/a> for power after historic <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/SupremeCourt?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#SupremeCourt<\/a> ruling confirming <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/MvskokeRez?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@MvskokeRez<\/a>.<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/EPAallnations?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@EPAallnations<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/HonorTheTreaties?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#HonorTheTreaties<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/1Cm62o5roO\">pic.twitter.com\/1Cm62o5roO<\/a><\/p>&mdash; indianz.com (@indianz) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/indianz\/status\/1313247058791456769?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">October 5, 2020<\/a><\/blockquote> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script>\r\n<P><\/P>\r\nWe should, therefore, not be surprised that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has stepped through the \u201cdisestablishment\u201d door left wide open in <em>McGirt<\/em>. On October 1, 2020, the EPA, at the request of the governor of Oklahoma, granted the state regulatory control over environmental issues in \u201careas of Indian country described in the state\u2019s request.\u201d\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nGovernor Stitt and EPA Administrator, Andrew Wheeler, had the audacity to flaunt the <em>McGirt<\/em>decision, knowing that it upheld US domination despite its appealing rhetoric. As <a href=\"https:\/\/documentcloud.adobe.com\/link\/review?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3A9c26a810-0dec-46bf-a0a7-55ca523d6ffc#pageNum=1\">Wheeler\u2019s letter <\/a>put it:\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<div class=\"mx-4\"><EM>\u2026the impetus for the State\u2019s request was the recent decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in <em>McGirt v. Oklahoma<\/em>\u2026. EPA understands the State\u2019s reference to <em>McGirt<\/em> as an explanation of the State\u2019s intent substantially to reestablish the geographic scope of the State\u2019s environmental programs as implemented prior to the Supreme Court\u2019s decision\u2026.<\/em><\/div>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nSome may call this \u201crealpolitik\u201d; some may call it \u201cplaying hardball.\u201d It is both. And yet, how exactly does it work? Didn\u2019t <em>McGirt<\/em> say Oklahoma didn\u2019t have jurisdiction in \u201cIndian Country\u201d? Aha! Re-read above: <em>McGirt<\/em> said, \u201cCongress remains free to [take action]\u2026 about the lands in question at any time. It has no shortage of tools at its disposal.\u201d And what \u201ctools\u201d did the EPA and Oklahoma rely on?\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nThey relied on a tiny provision snuck into an innocuous-sounding law passed in 2005, titled <a href=\"https:\/\/www.govinfo.gov\/content\/pkg\/PLAW-109publ59\/pdf\/PLAW-109publ59.pdf\">\u201cSafe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users.\u201d<\/a> In typical American political style, the title boils down to the catchy acronym SAFETEA. Who but a true cynic would guess there was a little provision in the Act about environmental regulation that applied only to Oklahoma? It was inserted by Senator James Inhofe of Oklahoma, Chair of the US Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. \r\n<p><\/p>\r\nThe provision was \u201cSECTION 10211. ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS. OKLAHOMA.\u201d Here\u2019s the part the governor and administrator used:\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<div class=\"mx-4\"><EM>\u2026on request of the State, the Administrator [of the Environmental Protection Agency] shall approve the State to administer the State program in the areas of the State that are in Indian country, without any further demonstration of authority by the State.<\/em><\/div>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nWhen <a href=\"https:\/\/tyt.com\/stories\/4vZLCHuQrYE4uKagy0oyMA\/65Oa5a0nYI4rljnOqxhUto\"><em>TYT News<\/em> reported <\/a>the EPA had granted Oklahoma the same authority the state had before <em>McGirt<\/em>, they explained that the EPA \u201ccan do this because federal legislation can nullify Supreme Court rulings.\u201d In this case, the legislation was passed 15 years before the ruling, so it\u2019s not quite right to say it \u201cnullified\u201d it. Nonetheless, this is precisely the Achilles heel of <em>McGirt<\/em>. It was visible to anyone who really read the <em>McGirt<\/em> decision: \u201cCongress remains free\u2026. It has no shortage of tools\u2026.\u201d\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\"><p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Cherokee Nation Principal Chief <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/ChuckHoskin_Jr?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@ChuckHoskin_Jr<\/a> issues statement today on the EPA granting the state oversight of environmental regulations on tribal lands. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/YljiSfUDLi\">pic.twitter.com\/YljiSfUDLi<\/a><\/p>&mdash; CherokeeNation (@CherokeeNation) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/CherokeeNation\/status\/1313173663747842049?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">October 5, 2020<\/a><\/blockquote> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><P><\/P>\r\nThe \u201cfreedom\u201d of Congress is the <em>unfreedom<\/em> of Native nations and peoples. The original free existence of Native nations and peoples in their own lands was and is the target of federal Indian law. Federal Indian law, understood to its core \u2014 \u201cplenary power\u201d \u2014 is federal <strong>anti-Indian<\/strong> law, built to seize Native lands. The EPA \u2013 Oklahoma deal is only the latest effort.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nCasey Camp-Horinek, Environmental Ambassador, Elder, and Hereditary Drumkeeper, Ponca Nation, provided the <a href=\"https:\/\/tyt.com\/stories\/4vZLCHuQrYE4uKagy0oyMA\/65Oa5a0nYI4rljnOqxhUto\">following statement to TYT<\/a>:\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<div class=\"mx-4\"><EM>\u201cAfter over 500 years of oppression, lies, genocide, ecocide, and broken treaties, we should have expected the EPA ruling in favor of racist Governor Stitt of Oklahoma, yet it still stings. Under the Trump administration, destroying all environmental protection has been ramped up to give the fossil fuel industry life support as it takes its last dying breath. Who suffers the results? Everyone and everything! Who benefits? Trump and his cronies, climate change deniers like Governor Stitt, Senators Inhofe and Langford, who are financially supported by big oil and gas. I am convinced that we must fight back against this underhanded ruling. In the courts, on the frontlines and in the international courts, LIFE itself is at stake.\u201d<\/EM><\/div>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nLife is at stake. And federal anti-Indian law is part of the problem. Despite the fancy rhetoric of \u201ctrust relationship\u201d and \u201cgovernment-to-government relationship,\u201d the basic doctrine in federal Indian law is \u201cplenary power.\u201d As the 1903 <em><a href=\"https:\/\/supreme.justia.com\/cases\/federal\/us\/187\/553\/\">Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock<\/a><\/em> decision cited by <em>McGirt<\/em> makes clear, this so-called \u201cplenary power\u201d is an outgrowth of the 1823 federal Indian law property doctrine of \u201cChristian discovery.\u201d\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nHere\u2019s how Chief Justice John Marshall stated \u201cChristian discovery\u201d in the 1823 case, <em><a href=\"https:\/\/supreme.justia.com\/cases\/federal\/us\/21\/543\/\">Johnson v. McIntosh<\/a><\/em>:\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<div class=mx-4>\r\n<em>The colonists \u201cacquire<div class=\"date\">Thursday, October 8, 2020<\/div> territory on this continent \u2026[under] the principle [of the] right of discovery [of] countries then unknown to all Christian people\u2026.<\/em>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<em>\u201c[This is] a right to take possession, notwithstanding the occupancy of the natives, who were heathens, and, at the same time, admitting the prior title of any <strong>Christian people <\/strong>who may have made a previous discovery. [<strong>Marshall\u2019s<\/strong> <strong>emphasis<\/strong>]<\/em>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nMarshall was emphatic in adopting \u201cChristian discovery\u201d into US law. He said, <em>\u201cThe United States\u2026have unequivocally acceded to that great and broad rule\u2026<\/em>.\u201d\r\n<p><\/p><div class=\"mt-1 mb-1\"><ins class=\"adsbygoogle\" style=\"display:block; text-align:center;\" data-ad-layout=\"in-article\" data-ad-format=\"fluid\" data-ad-client=\"ca-pub-8411603009680747\" data-ad-slot=\"6394965691\"><\/ins><script>(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/script><\/div><p><\/p>\r\nJustice Joseph Story, who participated in the <em>Johnson v. McIntosh<\/em> decision, later put it this way in his <em><a href=\"https:\/\/play.google.com\/books\/reader?id=qAO3x-GN2rsC&amp;hl=en&amp;pg=GBS.PA135.w.2.2.0\">Commentaries<\/a><\/em>:\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<div class=mx-4>\r\n<em>\u201c\u2026the title of the Indians was not treated as a right of propriety and dominion; but as a mere right of occupancy. As infidels, heathen, and savages, they were not allowed to possess the prerogatives belonging to absolute, sovereign and independent nations.<\/em>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n\u201c<em>The territory, over which they wandered, and which they used for their temporary and fugitive purposes, was, in respect to Christians, deemed, as if it were inhabited only by brute animals.\u201d<\/em><\/div>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nWhat more needs to be said? A colonial, racist doctrine of religious supremacy is still at the core of US \u201cfederal Indian law.\u201d Native peoples are \u201cmerely occupants\u201d not owners in their lands. They have the same legal status as \u201cbrute animals.\u201d That is the \u201claw\u201d that still upholds colonizing, extractive industries and governments destroying the world\u2019s ecosystems.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<em>McGirt<\/em> may have some usefulness to those who will try to block the EPA \u2013 Oklahoma deal. The majority said Congress must be \u201cclear\u201d when it \u201cdisestablishes\u201d a Native nation. Was the tiny provision hidden in the \u201cTransportation Equity Act\u201d a \u201cclear expression\u201d of the intent of Congress to impose state jurisdiction over Native nations surrounded by Oklahoma? That will be the technical question.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nThe real question is how much longer America will tolerate a racist religious doctrine as part of its legal system.\r\n<p><\/p><HR><EM>Peter d\u2019Errico graduated from Yale Law School in 1968. He was Staff attorney in Din\u00e9be\u2019iin\u00e1 N\u00e1hii\u0142na be Agha\u2019diit\u2019ahii Navajo Legal Services, 1968-1970, in Shiprock. He taught Legal Studies at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 1970-2002. He is a consulting attorney on Indigenous issues.<\/em><HR>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"How much longer America will tolerate a racist religious doctrine as part of its legal system?","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2358,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"_vp_format_video_url":"","_vp_image_focal_point":[],"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,20,13,9],"tags":[561,563,75,559,565,397,560,564,429,127,562,61,278,85,220,84,154],"class_list":["post-2341","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-environment","category-indian-trust","category-law","category-opinion","tag-andrew-wheeler","tag-casey-camp-horinek","tag-donald-trump","tag-epa","tag-james-inhofe","tag-jurisdiction","tag-kevin-stitt","tag-muscogee","tag-neil-gorsuch","tag-oklahoma","tag-ponca","tag-racism","tag-religion","tag-republicans","tag-sovereignty","tag-supreme-court","tag-treaties","no-wpautop"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/kevinstitt-scaled.jpg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pcoJ7g-BL","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2341","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2341"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2341\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2358"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2341"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2341"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2341"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}