{"id":21388,"date":"2022-02-24T11:38:31","date_gmt":"2022-02-24T16:38:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.indianz.com\/News\/?p=21388"},"modified":"2022-02-24T11:38:32","modified_gmt":"2022-02-24T16:38:32","slug":"cronkite-news-court-sides-with-company-in-dispute-over-grand-canyon-uranium-mine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2022\/02\/24\/cronkite-news-court-sides-with-company-in-dispute-over-grand-canyon-uranium-mine\/","title":{"rendered":"Cronkite News: Court sides with company in dispute over Grand Canyon uranium mine"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"embed-responsive embed-responsive-16by9\">\r\n<div class=\" content_cards_card content_cards_domain_youtu-be\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"content_cards_image\">\n\t\t\t\t<a class=\"content_cards_image_link\" href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/XM_s_9xsK6s\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/plugins\/content-cards\/skins\/default\/content-cards-placeholder.png\" alt=\" - YouTube\">\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\n\t<div class=\"content_cards_title\">\n\t\t<a class=\"content_cards_title_link\" href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/XM_s_9xsK6s\">\n\t\t\t &#8211; YouTube\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n\t<div class=\"content_cards_description\">\n\t\t<a class=\"content_cards_description_link\" href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/XM_s_9xsK6s\">\n\t\t\t<p>Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.<\/p>\n\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n\t<div class=\"content_cards_site_name\">\n\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/s\/desktop\/f51d9955\/img\/favicon.ico\" alt=\"youtu.be\" class=\"content_cards_favicon\"\/>\t\tyoutu.be\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<figcaption class=\"figure-caption\">9th Circuit Court of Appeals: <a href=https:\/\/www.ca9.uscourts.gov\/media\/video\/?20210830\/20-16401\/>Grand Canyon Trust v. Heather Provencio &#8211; No. 20-16401 &#8211; August 30, 2021<\/a>\r\n<\/figcaption>\r\n<div class=\"h3-responsive font-weight-bold\">Uranium mine near Grand Canyon permitted by court, despite mining ban<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"date\">Thursday, February 24, 2022<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"byline\">By Camila Pedrosa<\/div>\r\n<DIV class=source>Cronkite News<\/DIV>\r\n<DIV class=source-website><A \r\nhref=\"https:\/\/cronkitenews.azpbs.org\/\">cronkitenews.azpbs.org<\/A><\/DIV>\r\n<P><\/P>\r\nWASHINGTON, D.C. &#8212;  A federal court ruled Tuesday that a uranium mine near the Grand Canyon can operate, even though it sits on 1 million acres that the federal government has declared off-limits to new mining.<P><\/P>\r\nA three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals <a href=\"https:\/\/cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov\/datastore\/opinions\/2022\/02\/22\/20-16401.pdf\">rejected claims<\/a> by tribal and environmental groups that the U.S. Forest Service erred when it reviewed the mine owner\u2019s rights to operate the <a href=https:\/\/www.fs.usda.gov\/detail\/kaibab\/home\/?cid=FSM91_050263>Pinyon Plain Mine<\/a>, by improperly calculating its potential profitability. <P><\/P>\r\nThe permit for the mine, formerly known as the Canyon Mine, was first issued in 1986, meaning it was grandfathered in when the mining moratorium near the canyon was imposed in 2012. But operations have been largely stalled for decades by a depressed uranium market.<P><\/P>\r\n <a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2022\/02\/24\/cronkite-news-court-sides-with-company-in-dispute-over-grand-canyon-uranium-mine\/mine-fight\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-21400\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"2000\" height=\"1500\" data-attachment-id=\"21400\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2022\/02\/24\/cronkite-news-court-sides-with-company-in-dispute-over-grand-canyon-uranium-mine\/mine-fight\/\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/24\/pinyonplainminecanyonmine.jpg\" data-orig-size=\"2000,1500\" data-comments-opened=\"0\" data-image-title=\"Pinyon Plain Mine formerly known as Canyon Mine\" data-image-description=\"&lt;p&gt;Pinyon Plain Mine formerly known as Canyon Mine&lt;\/p&gt;\n\" data-image-caption=\"&lt;p&gt;Energy Fuels Inc.&amp;#8217;s Canyon Mine is located less than 10 miles from the gates of Grand Canyon National Park. Photo by Chris Cadeau \/ Cronkite News&lt;\/p&gt;\n\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/24\/pinyonplainminecanyonmine-1024x768.jpg\" src=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/24\/pinyonplainminecanyonmine.jpg\" alt=\"Pinyon Plain Mine formerly known as Canyon Mine\"   class=\"size-full wp-image-21400\" \/><\/a> <figcaption class=\"figure-caption\">Energy Fuels Inc.&#8217;s Canyon Mine is located less than 10 miles from the gates of Grand Canyon National Park.  Photo by Chris Cadeau \/ Cronkite News <\/figcaption>\r\n<P><\/P>\r\n\u201cWe are of course pleased that the 9th Circuit ruled in favor of the Forest Service, so we can advance this clean energy resource under the watchful eye of our state and federal regulators,\u201d said Curtis Moore, vice president of marketing and corporate development at <a href=https:\/\/www.energyfuels.com\/pinyon-plain-mine>Energy Fuels Resources, which owns the mine<\/a>.<P><\/P>\r\nAn attorney for the <a href=https:\/\/www.grandcanyontrust.org\/>Grand Canyon Trust<\/a>, one of the groups suing to block mine, said plaintiffs were \u201cdisappointed in the outcome and are evaluating our options.\u201d But other opponents were more vocal.<P><\/P>\r\n\u201cToday&#8217;s ruling \u2026 only deepens our resolve to stop this mine and its deadly pollution threat to Grand Canyon&#8217;s precious springs and aquifers,&#8221; said Taylor McKinnon, a senior campaigner with the Center for Biological Diversity.<P><\/P>\r\n<div class=\" content_cards_card content_cards_domain_twitter-com\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"content_cards_image\">\n\t\t\t\t<a class=\"content_cards_image_link\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/GrandCanynTrust\/status\/1496218738365972489\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/pbs.twimg.com\/media\/FE6l6vEUYAAZjAf?format=webp&#038;name=large\" alt=\"Grand Canyon Trust (@GrandCanynTrust) on X\">\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\n\t<div class=\"content_cards_title\">\n\t\t<a class=\"content_cards_title_link\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/GrandCanynTrust\/status\/1496218738365972489\">\n\t\t\tGrand Canyon Trust (@GrandCanynTrust) on X\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n\t<div class=\"content_cards_description\">\n\t\t<a class=\"content_cards_description_link\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/GrandCanynTrust\/status\/1496218738365972489\">\n\t\t\t<p>The Grand Canyon is too precious to mine. It&#8217;s time to ban new uranium mines around the Grand Canyon, forever. Please take 2 minutes to ask your senators to support Senate bill 387, The Grand Canyon Protection Act. \ud83d\udcf7: Ed Moss<\/p>\n\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n\t<div class=\"content_cards_site_name\">\n\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/favicon.ico\" alt=\"X (formerly Twitter)\" class=\"content_cards_favicon\"\/>\t\tX (formerly Twitter)\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\r\n<P><\/P>\r\nThis is the second time the circuit court has considered Grand Canyon Trust v. Provencio, and at least the third ruling it has issued on this particular mine, going all the way back to the 1980s when the project was first proposed.<P><\/P>\r\nThe Forest Service first approved a plan of operations for what was then the Canyon Mine in 1986, sparking a legal challenge by the Havasupai Tribe. But courts upheld the approval for the mine, and its owner at the time, Energy Fuels Nuclear Inc., began to build surface structures and sink what was to be a 1,400-foot mine shaft.<P><\/P>\r\nBy 1992, however, falling uranium prices drove the company to suspend operations with just 50 feet of mine shaft drilled.<P><\/P>\r\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"100%\" height=\"300\" scrolling=\"no\" frameborder=\"no\" allow=\"autoplay\" src=\"https:\/\/w.soundcloud.com\/player\/?url=https%3A\/\/api.soundcloud.com\/tracks\/1221382555&#038;color=%23ff5500&#038;auto_play=false&#038;hide_related=false&#038;show_comments=true&#038;show_user=true&#038;show_reposts=false&#038;show_teaser=true&#038;visual=true\"><\/iframe><div style=\"font-size: 10px; color: #cccccc;line-break: anywhere;word-break: normal;overflow: hidden;white-space: nowrap;text-overflow: ellipsis; font-family: Interstate,Lucida Grande,Lucida Sans Unicode,Lucida Sans,Garuda,Verdana,Tahoma,sans-serif;font-weight: 100;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/soundcloud.com\/indianz\" title=\"indianz\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"color: #cccccc; text-decoration: none;\" rel=\"noopener\">indianz<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"https:\/\/soundcloud.com\/indianz\/grand-canyon-trust-v-heather-provencio\" title=\"Grand Canyon Trust v. Heather Provencio\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"color: #cccccc; text-decoration: none;\" rel=\"noopener\">Grand Canyon Trust v. Heather Provencio<\/a><\/div>\r\n<figcaption class=\"figure-caption\">Indianz.Com Audio: <a href=https:\/\/soundcloud.com\/indianz\/grand-canyon-trust-v-heather-provencio>9th Circuit Court of Appeals &#8211; Grand Canyon Trust v. Heather Provencio &#8211; August 30, 2021<\/a>\r\n<\/figcaption>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nA spike in uranium prices in 2007 renewed interest in mining and led to \u201cthousands of new mining claims\u201d near the Grand Canyon, according to Circuit Judge Jay S. Bybee\u2019s ruling Tuesday. That led the Interior Department to propose &#8211; and eventually adopt, in 2012 &#8211; a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.doi.gov\/news\/pressreleases\/Secretary-Salazar-Announces-Decision-to-Withdraw-Public-Lands-near-Grand-Canyon-from-New-Mining-Claims\">20-year moratorium<\/a> on mining on about 1 million acres.<P><\/P>\r\nBefore that ban took effect, however, Energy Fuels told the Forest Service that it wanted to resume operations at the Pinyon Plain Mine. Bybee said the mining company did not need Forest Service approval to resume operations, but agreed to hold off while the service conducted a valid existing rights review.<P><\/P>\r\nThe government\u2019s review determined that \u201ca valuable mineral deposit\u201d had existed before the moratorium was proposed and that, under market conditions at the time, \u201cthe uranium deposit on the claims could be mined, removed, transported, milled and marketed at a profit.\u201d<P><\/P>\r\nOpponents sued, claiming that the financial analysis was faulty and that the mine\u2019s approval violated environmental and historic preservation regulations. A district judge threw out the case, and the 9th Circuit <a href=\"http:\/\/cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov\/datastore\/opinions\/2018\/10\/25\/15-15754.pdf\">upheld most<\/a> of that dismissal but ordered the lower court to reconsider the Forest Service\u2019s handling of the financial review.<P><\/P>\r\n <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"2000\" height=\"1333\" data-attachment-id=\"21401\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2022\/02\/24\/cronkite-news-court-sides-with-company-in-dispute-over-grand-canyon-uranium-mine\/canyon-mine\/\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/24\/canyonminepinyonplainmine.jpg\" data-orig-size=\"2000,1333\" data-comments-opened=\"0\" data-image-title=\"Pinyon Plain Mine formerly known as Canyon Mine\" data-image-description=\"&lt;p&gt;Pinyon Plain Mine formerly known as Canyon Mine&lt;\/p&gt;\n\" data-image-caption=\"&lt;p&gt;The Canyon Mine was approved in 1986 but has not produced any uranium, in part because of low prices due to subsidized foreign producers. (Photo by Jake Eldridge\/Cronkite News)&lt;\/p&gt;\n\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/24\/canyonminepinyonplainmine-1024x682.jpg\" src=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/24\/canyonminepinyonplainmine.jpg\" alt=\"Pinyon Plain Mine formerly known as Canyon Mine\"   class=\"size-full wp-image-21401\" \/><\/a> <figcaption class=\"figure-caption\">The Canyon Mine was approved in 1986 but has not produced any uranium, in part because of low prices due to subsidized foreign producers. (Photo by Jake Eldridge\/Cronkite News)<\/figcaption>\r\n<P><\/P>\r\nThe district court again ruled against the opponents, and the circuit court this time agreed, rejecting the claim that the Forest Service should have included \u201csunk costs\u201d &#8211; unrecoverable expenses from the original development of the mine.<P><\/P>\r\nBybee said that Interior Department policy for more than 40 years has been to exclude sunk costs, and that the Forest Service decision was not, therefore, \u201carbitrary and capricious.\u201d<P><\/P>\r\nHe cited several other courts which have ruled that counting sunk costs is \u201c\u2018a foolish notion that should not be entertained by anyone who has had even a single undergraduate economics course.\u2019\u201d<P><\/P>\r\nMoore welcomed the ruling, saying carbon-free energy sources like nuclear are seeing a \u201cmassive resurgence globally\u201d due to climate change concerns, and the U.S. needs to expand its production of uranium at home to keep up.<P><\/P><div class=\"mt-1 mb-1\"><ins class=\"adsbygoogle\" style=\"display:block; text-align:center;\" data-ad-layout=\"in-article\" data-ad-format=\"fluid\" data-ad-client=\"ca-pub-8411603009680747\" data-ad-slot=\"6394965691\"><\/ins><script>(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/script><\/div><P><\/P>\r\n\u201cDeveloping our domestic sources of uranium is becoming increasingly important due to America\u2019s current overreliance on Russia and its allies for our uranium and nuclear fuel,\u201d Moore said.<P><\/P>\r\nBut McKinnon questioned the need for mining near the iconic Grand Canyon, which she said will only worsen environmental problems in the watershed.<P><\/P>\r\n&#8220;Aquifer pollution would be impossible to clean up,\u201d McKinnon said. \u201cIt&#8217;s not a risk worth taking, and no amount of uranium industry drivel will change that fact.&#8221;<P><\/P>\r\n<STRONG>For more stories from Cronkite News, visit <A href=\"https:\/\/cronkitenews.azpbs.org\/?utm_source=referral&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=client\">cronkitenews.azpbs.org<\/A>.<\/STRONG>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<HR><EM>Note: This story originally <a href=\"https:\/\/cronkitenews.azpbs.org\/2022\/02\/22\/uranium-mine-near-grand-canyon-permitted-by-court-despite-mining-ban\/\">appeared on Cronkite News<\/a>.  It  is published via a <A href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/\">Creative  Commons license<\/A>. Cronkite News is produced by the <A href=\"https:\/\/cronkite.asu.edu\/\">Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication<\/A> at <A href=\"https:\/\/www.asu.edu\">Arizona State University<\/A>.<\/EM><HR>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"A federal appeals court ruled that a uranium mine near the Grand Canyon can operate, even though it sits on land declared off-limits to new mining.","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":21400,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_vp_format_video_url":"","_vp_image_focal_point":[],"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[10,11,13,1,14],"tags":[468,42,46,118,1005,892,928,474],"class_list":["post-21388","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-business","category-environment","category-law","category-national","category-politics","tag-9th-circuit","tag-arizona","tag-cronkite-news","tag-doi","tag-grand-canyon","tag-mining","tag-uranium","tag-usfs","no-wpautop"],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pcoJ7g-5yY","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/24\/pinyonplainminecanyonmine.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21388","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21388"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21388\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/21400"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21388"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21388"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21388"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}