{"id":17053,"date":"2021-10-19T21:34:22","date_gmt":"2021-10-20T01:34:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.indianz.com\/News\/?p=17053"},"modified":"2022-04-28T12:34:41","modified_gmt":"2022-04-28T16:34:41","slug":"supreme-court-takes-up-indian-law-cases-as-tribes-face-new-unknown","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/10\/19\/supreme-court-takes-up-indian-law-cases-as-tribes-face-new-unknown\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court takes up Indian law cases as tribes face new \u2018unknown\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":" <a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/10\/19\/supreme-court-takes-up-indian-law-cases-as-tribes-face-new-unknown\/speakingrockentertainmentcenter\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-17086\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"2560\" height=\"1711\" data-attachment-id=\"17086\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/10\/19\/supreme-court-takes-up-indian-law-cases-as-tribes-face-new-unknown\/speakingrockentertainmentcenter\/\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/20\/SpeakingRockEntertainmentCenter-scaled.jpg\" data-orig-size=\"2560,1711\" data-comments-opened=\"0\" data-image-title=\"Speaking Rock Entertainment Center\" data-image-description=\"&lt;p&gt;Speaking Rock Entertainment Center&lt;\/p&gt;\n\" data-image-caption=\"&lt;p&gt;The Speaking Rock Entertainment Center is owned and operated by the  Ysleta del Sur Pueblo, also known as the Tigua Tribe, in El Paso, Texas. Photo: Speaking Rock Entertainment Center&lt;\/p&gt;\n\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/20\/SpeakingRockEntertainmentCenter-1024x684.jpg\" src=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/20\/SpeakingRockEntertainmentCenter-scaled.jpg\" alt=\"Speaking Rock Entertainment Center\"   class=\"size-full wp-image-17086\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"figure-caption\"> The Speaking Rock Entertainment Center is owned and operated by the  Ysleta del Sur Pueblo, also known as the Tigua Tribe, in El Paso, Texas. Photo: Speaking Rock Entertainment Center<\/figcaption>\r\n<div class=\"h3-responsive font-weight-bold\">Supreme Court takes up Indian law cases as tribes face new \u2018unknown\u2019<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"date\">Tuesday, October 19, 2021<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"byline\">By Acee Agoyo<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"source\">Indianz.Com<\/div>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nWASHINGTON, D.C. &#8212; The nation&#8217;s highest court is back in session amid <a href=\/covid19\/>COVID-19<\/a> and it&#8217;s shaping up to be a busy one for tribes and their advocates.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nIn an <a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/20\/101821zor_4f14.pdf\">order list<\/a> on Monday, the <a href=https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/>U.S. Supreme Court<\/a> added only two new cases to the docket for its <a href=https:\/\/sct.narf.org\/termindexes\/october2021.html>October 2021 term<\/a>. The action was notable in and of of itself, since both cases happen to come from Indian Country.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nBut  the granting of the  petitions in  <a href=https:\/\/sct.narf.org\/caseindexes\/denezpi_v_us.html><em>Denezpi v. United States<\/em><\/a> and <a href=https:\/\/sct.narf.org\/caseindexes\/ysleta_del_sur_v_tx.html><em>Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas<\/em><\/a>    presents new challenges for the tribal legal community. That&#8217;s because there&#8217;s a new member of the high court, one who doesn&#8217;t have much of a record when it comes to Indian Country&#8217;s interests.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n\u201cWe have one unknown,\u201d John Echohawk, the longtime executive director of the <a href=https:\/\/www.narf.org\/>Native American Rights Fund<\/a>, told tribal leaders last week. \u201cThere&#8217;s a new justice on the court, <a href=https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Amy_Coney_Barrett>Amy Coney Barrett<\/a>.\u201d\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n\u201cWe&#8217;re really not sure how she&#8217;s going to be ruling on our federal Indian law issues,\u201d  added \r\nEchohawk, who is a citizen of the Pawnee Nation. \r\n<p><\/p>\r\n\u201cSo that&#8217;s one of the things that we&#8217;re watching,\u201d  Echohawk said on the final day of the 78th annual convention of the <a href=https:\/\/www.ncai.org\/>National Congress of American Indians<\/a> last Thursday.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nBarrett was nominated to the Supreme Court by Republican former president Donald Trump, whose executive policy  actions frequently went against Indian Country. His pick, as part of the judicial brach of the U.S. government,  will now be ruling on cases impacting two major issues: tribal sovereignty and tribal gaming.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"100%\" height=\"550\" scrolling=\"no\" frameborder=\"no\" allow=\"autoplay\" src=\"https:\/\/w.soundcloud.com\/player\/?url=https%3A\/\/api.soundcloud.com\/playlists\/1333832377&#038;color=%23ff5500&#038;auto_play=false&#038;hide_related=false&#038;show_comments=true&#038;show_user=true&#038;show_reposts=false&#038;show_teaser=true&#038;visual=true\"><\/iframe><div style=\"font-size: 10px; color: #cccccc;line-break: anywhere;word-break: normal;overflow: hidden;white-space: nowrap;text-overflow: ellipsis; font-family: Interstate,Lucida Grande,Lucida Sans Unicode,Lucida Sans,Garuda,Verdana,Tahoma,sans-serif;font-weight: 100;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/soundcloud.com\/indianz\" title=\"indianz\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"color: #cccccc; text-decoration: none;\" rel=\"noopener\">indianz<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"https:\/\/soundcloud.com\/indianz\/sets\/tribal-supreme-court-update-ncaiannual21\" title=\"Tribal Supreme Court Update #NCAIAnnual21\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"color: #cccccc; text-decoration: none;\" rel=\"noopener\">Tribal Supreme Court Update #NCAIAnnual21<\/a><\/div>\r\n<figcaption class=\"figure-caption\">Indianz.Com Audio: <a href=https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/10\/19\/tribal-supreme-court-update-at-national-congress-of-american-indians\/>Tribal Supreme Court Update at National Congress of American Indians &#8211; October 14, 2021<\/a> \r\n<\/figcaption>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<div class=\"h5-responsive sub\"><em>Denezpi v. United States<\/em><\/div>\r\nMerle Denezpi, a  citizen of the <a href=https:\/\/www.navajo-nsn.gov\/>Navajo Nation<\/a>, is raising an issue that has come before the Supreme Court at least once in recent years. He disputes whether he can be prosecuted by the United States government and by a tribal government for the same crime. In this case, he was pursued by both the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.utemountainutetribe.com\">Ute Mountain Ute Tribe<\/a> and by the U.S. for a crime involving sexual assault.\r\n<P><\/P>\r\nNormally, the <a href=https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/constitution\/fifth_amendment>double jeopardy clause of the U.S. Constitution<\/a> protects someone from being prosecuted twice for the same crime. But  the prohibition does not usually apply in Indian Country because tribes are separate sovereigns, the <a href=https:\/\/www.ca10.uscourts.gov\/>10th Circuit Court of Appeals<\/a> noted in October 2020.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n\u201cAll parties agree that the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe has the inherent power to prosecute criminal offenses committed by an Indian on its sovereign lands and that the source of this power is the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe\u2019s \u2018pre-existing sovereignty,\u2019\u201d Judge Stephanie   Seymour <a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/20\/010110429709.pdf\">wrote for the court<\/a>.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n Denezpi  accepted a guilty plea in Ute Mountain Ute court for  a charge of assault on the tribe&#8217;s reservation in southern Colorado. However, he contends that the tribe&#8217;s judicial forum, which is known as a <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Code_of_Indian_Offenses\">Court of Indian Offenses<\/a>, commonly known as a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bia.gov\/CFRCourts\">CFR Court<\/a>, is \u201cderived, at least in part, from federal power rather than from tribal sovereignty,\u201d Seymour observed.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"100%\" height=\"166\" scrolling=\"no\" frameborder=\"no\" allow=\"autoplay\" src=\"https:\/\/w.soundcloud.com\/player\/?url=https%3A\/\/api.soundcloud.com\/tracks\/1144688314&#038;color=%23ff5500&#038;auto_play=false&#038;hide_related=false&#038;show_comments=true&#038;show_user=true&#038;show_reposts=false&#038;show_teaser=true\"><\/iframe><div style=\"font-size: 10px; color: #cccccc;line-break: anywhere;word-break: normal;overflow: hidden;white-space: nowrap;text-overflow: ellipsis; font-family: Interstate,Lucida Grande,Lucida Sans Unicode,Lucida Sans,Garuda,Verdana,Tahoma,sans-serif;font-weight: 100;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/soundcloud.com\/indianz\" title=\"indianz\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"color: #cccccc; text-decoration: none;\" rel=\"noopener\">indianz<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"https:\/\/soundcloud.com\/indianz\/united-states-v-denezpi\" title=\"United States v. Denezpi\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"color: #cccccc; text-decoration: none;\" rel=\"noopener\">United States v. Denezpi<\/a><\/div>\r\n<figcaption class=\"figure-caption\">Indianz.Com Audio: <a href=https:\/\/soundcloud.com\/indianz\/united-states-v-denezpi>10th Circuit Court of Appeals &#8211; United States v. Denezpi &#8211; May 5, 2020<\/a>\r\n<\/figcaption>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nThe 10th Circuit rejected Denezpi&#8217;s argument. In the unanimous ruling, the court pointed out  that CFR Courts  \u201cfunction as tribal courts\u201d and thus derive their power from    tribal sovereignty.    \r\n<P><\/p>\r\n  \u201cDenezpi misses the point,\u201d Seymour  wrote. \u201cBecause it has never been withdrawn, the \u2018\u2018ultimate source\u2019 of the power undergirding\u2019 the CFR prosecution of Mr. Denezpi is the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe\u2019s inherent sovereignty.\u201d\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nThe Supreme Court, though, has never ruled exactly on whether CFR courts derive power from tribal sovereignty, Denezpi wrote in a petition  submitted   on March 26. The <a href=https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/>Department of Justice<\/a>, having come under the control of Democratic President Joe Biden, waived its right to file a response, a step  usually taken when the government believes a particular  case has little chance of being granted.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nThe high court apparently believes  otherwise, according to activity reflected in the  <a href=https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/search.aspx?filename=\/docket\/docketfiles\/html\/public\/20-7622.html>docket sheet  No. 20-7622<\/a>. After taking an initial look at Denezpi&#8217;s petition in May, the justices asked the Biden administration to file a response. Government attorneys finally submitted one on July 19, after requesting and receiving two extensions.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nAnd after scheduling the petition in <em>Denezpi v. United States<\/em>  for consideration during three closed-door conferences, the justices &#8212; or at least four of them &#8212; confirmed the novelty of    the case. They granted  <em>Denezpi<\/em> in the <a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/20\/101821zor_4f14.pdf\">order list on Monday<\/a> though they didn&#8217;t explain why they did so, as is their practice.\r\n<p><\/p><div class=\"mt-1 mb-1\"><ins class=\"adsbygoogle\" style=\"display:block; text-align:center;\" data-ad-layout=\"in-article\" data-ad-format=\"fluid\" data-ad-client=\"ca-pub-8411603009680747\" data-ad-slot=\"6394965691\"><\/ins><script>(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/script><\/div><p><\/p>\r\n<div class=\"h5-responsive sub\"><em>Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas<\/em><\/div>\r\nThe tribal casino industry has suffered major losses due to <a href=\/covid19\/>COVID-19<\/a>. According to the <a href=https:\/\/www.nigc.gov\/>National Indian Gaming Commission<\/a>, the federal agency that oversees the industry, <a href=https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/08\/17\/national-indian-gaming-commission-reports-decline-in-tribal-casino-revenues\/>revenues fell 19.5 percent<\/a> following the onset of the pandemic in 2020, <a href=https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/08\/17\/indian-gaming-industry-sees-unprecedented-drop-in-revenues-due-to-covid-19\/>taking Indian Country back to a time<\/a> not seen in decades, a decline that affects tribal, local and state governments thanks to   intertwined relationships seem across the nation. \r\n<p><\/p>\r\nBut some states would rather not have Indian gaming in the first place, regardless of a public health crisis that has impacted economies nationwide. That&#8217;s where the <a href=https:\/\/www.ysletadelsurpueblo.org\/>Ysleta del Sur Pueblo<\/a>, also known as the Tigua Tribe, finds itself. The state of Texas is once again trying to stop the  tribe from offering  bingo at the <a href=http:\/\/www.speakingrock.com\/>Speaking Rock Entertainment Center<\/a>  on its reservation near El Paso, the largest city in the region.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n\u201cThe economic consequences of discontinuing the current bingo operations on the Pueblo are severe, and will be felt by tribal members, employees, and the surrounding community,\u201d  the tribe wrote  in a petition submitted to the Supreme Court last October.\r\n<P><\/P>\r\n\u201cHundreds of jobs at the tribe\u2019s gaming facility will be lost &#8212; impacting not only the tribe but the entire El Paso region,\u201d the petition continued. \u201cIn shutting down the tribe\u2019s bingo operations, the district court recognized that  \u2018the harm that the tribe faces is truly irreparable.\u2019\u201d\r\n<P><\/P>\r\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"100%\" height=\"166\" scrolling=\"no\" frameborder=\"no\" allow=\"autoplay\" src=\"https:\/\/w.soundcloud.com\/player\/?url=https%3A\/\/api.soundcloud.com\/tracks\/1144689244&#038;color=%23ff5500&#038;auto_play=false&#038;hide_related=false&#038;show_comments=true&#038;show_user=true&#038;show_reposts=false&#038;show_teaser=true\"><\/iframe><div style=\"font-size: 10px; color: #cccccc;line-break: anywhere;word-break: normal;overflow: hidden;white-space: nowrap;text-overflow: ellipsis; font-family: Interstate,Lucida Grande,Lucida Sans Unicode,Lucida Sans,Garuda,Verdana,Tahoma,sans-serif;font-weight: 100;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/soundcloud.com\/indianz\" title=\"indianz\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"color: #cccccc; text-decoration: none;\" rel=\"noopener\">indianz<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"https:\/\/soundcloud.com\/indianz\/texas-v-ysleta-del-sur-pueblo\" title=\"Texas v. Ysleta del Sur Pueblo\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"color: #cccccc; text-decoration: none;\" rel=\"noopener\">Texas v. Ysleta del Sur Pueblo<\/a><\/div>\r\n<figcaption class=\"figure-caption\">Indianz.Com Audio: <a href=https:\/\/soundcloud.com\/indianz\/texas-v-ysleta-del-sur-pueblo>5th Circuit Court of Appeals &#8211; Texas v. Ysleta del Sur Pueblo &#8211; February 4, 2020<\/a>\r\n<\/figcaption>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nThe <a href=https:\/\/www.alabama-coushatta.com\/>Alabama-Coushatta Tribe<\/a>  finds itself in a similar  situation. Although fortunate to have reopened <a href=https:\/\/www.naskila.com\/>Naskila Gaming<\/a> following a COVID-19 shutdown that affected the entire industry last year, the state of Texas is pursuing a separate legal action to get the facility near Houston closed for good.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n\u201cThe bingo enterprises here also provide tribal members and residents in surrounding communities with well-paying jobs with good benefits, in areas of Texas with historically high poverty rates and unemployment,\u201d the tribe said in a friend of the court brief that also was signed by the   <a href=https:\/\/www.ncai.org\/>National Congress of American Indians<\/a>, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.indiangaming.org\">National Indian Gaming Association<\/a> and the USET Sovereignty Protection Fund. Together, the organizations represent nearly every tribe in the U.S.\r\n<P><\/P>\r\nDespite the united front from Indian Country, the high court did not appear immediately swayed by the petition in <em>Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas<\/em>.  Neither did the state of Texas, whose attorneys waived their right to respond before being compelled by the justices after an initial review of the case.  So  after taking a second look earlier this year, they asked  yet   another power &#8212; the United States &#8212; for some guidance.\r\n<P><\/P>\r\n<div class=\"fb-post\" data-href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/permalink.php?story_fbid=10158106549827611&amp;id=96256437610\" data-width=\"\" data-show-text=\"false\"><blockquote cite=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/permalink.php?story_fbid=10158106549827611&amp;id=96256437610\" class=\"fb-xfbml-parse-ignore\"><p>Images from Naskila Gaming 5th Anniversary 6\/9\/2021 \ud83c\udfb0\ud83c\udf895\ufe0f\u20e3<\/p>Posted by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/100064588608287\">Alabama Coushatta Tribe of Texas<\/a> on&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/permalink.php?story_fbid=10158106549827611&amp;id=96256437610\">Wednesday, June 9, 2021<\/a><\/blockquote><\/div>\r\n<P><\/P>\r\nThe <a href=https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/>Department of Justice<\/a>, now under President Biden&#8217;s power, finally responded on August 25. In a brief, government attorneys called for a  ruling from the <a href=https:\/\/www.ca5.uscourts.gov\/>5th Circuit Court of Appeals<\/a> to be overturned because it infringes on the Tigua Tribe&#8217;s sovereign right to engage in gaming just like almost every other Indian nation. Such inherent power is recognized by the <a href=https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Indian_Gaming_Regulatory_Act>Indian Gaming Regulatory Act<\/a> (IGRA) of 1988.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n\u201cThe court\u2019s contrary decision implicates important tribal sovereignty interests and undermines IGRA\u2019s key objectives,\u201d  government attorneys wrote of the <a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/20\/19-50400-CV0.pdf\">5th Circuit ruling from April 2020<\/a>.\r\n<P><\/P>\r\nEven then, the Supreme Court still didn&#8217;t seem convinced, judging by the entries on <a href=https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/search.aspx?filename=\/docket\/docketfiles\/html\/public\/20-493.html>docket sheet No. 20-493<\/a>. It took three more closed-door conferences, bringing the total number of conferences to five since November 2020,  before the <a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/20\/101821zor_4f14.pdf\">petition was granted on Monday<\/a>.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nStill, the advocacy the federal government may have helped. The Tigua Tribe has repeatedly petitioned the Supreme Court to consider its gaming plight as <a href=https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/show.asp?ID=mm\/652001-1>far back as 2001<\/a>, after the state of Texas first shut down Speaking Rock. The <a href=https:\/\/www.indianz.com\/IndianGaming\/2019\/10\/01\/alabamacoushatta-tribe-asks-supreme-cour.asp>Alabama-Coushatta Tribe also tried<\/a> to get the  <a href=https:\/\/www.supportactribe.com>long-standing dispute<\/a> resolved the justices, only to <a href=https:\/\/www.indianz.com\/IndianGaming\/2020\/01\/27\/alabamacoushatta-tribe-turns-to-congress.asp>rebuffed in early 2020<\/a>. The U.S. government was not at the table for this prior efforts.\r\n<P><\/P>\r\n<div class=\" content_cards_card content_cards_domain_twitter-com\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"content_cards_image\">\n\t\t\t\t<a class=\"content_cards_image_link\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/indianz\/status\/1450620271287750666\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/pbs.twimg.com\/card_img\/2076349909960167425\/Ev8BZceY?format=jpg&#038;name=orig\" alt=\"indianz.com (@indianz) on X\">\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\n\t<div class=\"content_cards_title\">\n\t\t<a class=\"content_cards_title_link\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/indianz\/status\/1450620271287750666\">\n\t\t\tindianz.com (@indianz) on X\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n\t<div class=\"content_cards_description\">\n\t\t<a class=\"content_cards_description_link\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/indianz\/status\/1450620271287750666\">\n\t\t\t<p>LISTEN: The National Congress of American Indians hears an update from the Tribal Supreme Court Project on October 14, 2021. @NCAI1944 #NCAIAnnual21 https:\/\/t.co\/FU6PPnuJ5O<\/p>\n\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n\t<div class=\"content_cards_site_name\">\n\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/favicon.ico\" alt=\"X (formerly Twitter)\" class=\"content_cards_favicon\"\/>\t\tX (formerly Twitter)\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\r\n<P><\/p>\r\n<div class=\"h5-responsive sub\">The  October 2021 Term <\/div>\r\nThe U.S. Supreme Court  began  its October 2021 term on October 4 by <a href=https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/10\/01\/supreme-court-returns-to-in-person-arguments-as-justice-tests-positive-for-covid-19\/>returning to in-person arguments for the first time<\/a> since the onset of COVID-19 in the spring of 2020. But <a href=https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Brett_Kavanaugh>Justice Brett Kavanaugh<\/a>, who joined the court during the Trump era  in October 2018,  had to <a href=https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/publicinfo\/press\/pressreleases\/pr_10-01-21a>sit out the first week of arguments<\/a> after testing positive for the coronavirus.\r\n<P><\/P>\r\nDespite the justices working together once again however, the nation&#8217;s highest court remains closed to the public. Livestreams are <a href=https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/publicinfo\/press\/pressreleases\/pr_09-29-21>still being provided<\/a>  and audio recordings of hearings are also made available.\r\n<P><\/P>\r\nThe court has not yet scheduled hearings in  <EM>Denezpi v. United States<\/em> and <EM>Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas<\/em>. With cases currently booked <a href=https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/oral_arguments\/argument_calendars\/MonthlyArgumentCalDecember2021.pdf>through December<\/a>, the earliest either one could <a href=https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/oral_arguments\/calendarsandlists.aspx>appear on the calendar<\/a> would be January 2022.\r\n<P><\/P>\r\nThe Supreme Court&#8217;s   most recent   COVID-era sessions, the first starting in <a href=https:\/\/sct.narf.org\/termindexes\/october2019.html>October 2019<\/a> and the second in <a href=https:\/\/sct.narf.org\/termindexes\/october2020.html>October 2020<\/a>,   have been eventful for Indian Country even though only three cases were heard. Two of them resulted in <a href=https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/10\/12\/chuck-hoskin-protecting-tribal-sovereignty-in-oklahoma-2\/>significant victories for tribal interests<\/a>, most notably the <a href=https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2020\/07\/09\/on-the-far-end-of-the-trail-of-tears-nat.asp>decision affirming the treaty-promised reservation<\/a> of the <a href=https:\/\/www.muscogeenation.com\/>Muscogee Nation<\/a> in Oklahoma. \r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<div class=\"h4-responsive\">Related Stories<\/div>\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/10\/12\/chuck-hoskin-protecting-tribal-sovereignty-in-oklahoma-2\/\" title=\"Chuck Hoskin: Protecting tribal sovereignty in Oklahoma\">Chuck Hoskin: Protecting tribal sovereignty in Oklahoma<\/a> (October 12, 2021)<BR><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/10\/01\/supreme-court-returns-to-in-person-arguments-as-justice-tests-positive-for-covid-19\/\" title=\"Supreme Court returns to in-person arguments as justice tests positive for COVID-19\">Supreme Court returns to in-person arguments as justice tests positive for COVID-19<\/a> (October 1, 2021)<BR><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/09\/27\/indian-country-today-alaska-native-corporations-finally-receive-covid-19-funds\/\" title=\"Indian Country Today: Alaska Native corporations finally receive COVID-19 funds\">Indian Country Today: Alaska Native corporations finally receive COVID-19 funds<\/a> (September 27, 2021)<BR><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/08\/27\/muscogee-nation-tribal-sovereignty-is-not-a-threat-to-oklahoma\/\" title=\"Muscogee Nation: Tribal sovereignty is not a threat to Oklahoma\">Muscogee Nation: Tribal sovereignty is not a threat to Oklahoma<\/a> (August 27, 2021)<BR><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/08\/02\/gaylord-news-funding-bill-passes-without-additional-support-for-tribal-justice-systems\/\" title=\"Gaylord News: Funding bill passes without additional support for tribal justice systems\">Gaylord News: Funding bill passes without additional support for tribal justice systems<\/a> (August 2, 2021)<BR><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/07\/12\/chuck-hoskin-cherokee-nation-celebrates-sovereignty-milestone\/\" title=\"Chuck Hoskin: Cherokee Nation celebrates sovereignty milestone\">Chuck Hoskin: Cherokee Nation celebrates sovereignty milestone<\/a> (July 12, 2021)<BR><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/07\/09\/muscogee-nation-proclaims-sovereignty-day-on-anniversary-of-historic-supreme-court-ruling\/\" title=\"Muscogee Nation proclaims Sovereignty Day on anniversary of historic Supreme Court ruling\">Muscogee Nation proclaims Sovereignty Day on anniversary of historic Supreme Court ruling<\/a> (July 9, 2021)<BR><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/06\/25\/nations-highest-court-sides-with-alaska-native-corporations-in-covid-19-dispute\/\" title=\"Nation\u2019s highest court sides with Alaska Native corporations in COVID-19 dispute\">Nation\u2019s highest court sides with Alaska Native corporations in COVID-19 dispute<\/a> (June 25, 2021)<BR><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/06\/21\/i-wanted-to-cry-tribes-welcome-ruling-in-long-running-health-care-dispute\/\" title=\"\u2018I wanted to cry\u2019: Tribes welcome ruling in long-running health care dispute\">\u2018I wanted to cry\u2019: Tribes welcome ruling in long-running health care dispute<\/a> (June 21, 2021)<BR><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/06\/11\/scotusblog-supreme-court-decision-marks-a-first-for-tribal-sovereignty\/\" title=\"SCOTUSBlog: Supreme Court decision marks a first for tribal sovereignty\">SCOTUSBlog: Supreme Court decision marks a first for tribal sovereignty<\/a> (June 11, 2021)<BR><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/06\/11\/montana-free-press-supreme-court-supports-tribal-sovereignty-in-law-enforcement-case\/\" title=\"Montana Free Press: Supreme Court supports tribal sovereignty in law enforcement case\">Montana Free Press: Supreme Court supports tribal sovereignty in law enforcement case<\/a> (June 11, 2021)<BR><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/06\/04\/cronkite-news-supreme-court-finally-got-it-right-on-tribal-sovereignty\/\" title=\"Cronkite News: Supreme Court finally \u2018got it right\u2019 on tribal sovereignty\">Cronkite News: Supreme Court finally \u2018got it right\u2019 on tribal sovereignty<\/a> (June 4, 2021)<BR><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/06\/03\/scotusblog-supreme-court-supports-tribal-sovereignty-over-non-indians\/\" title=\"SCOTUSBlog: Supreme Court supports tribal sovereignty over non-Indians\">SCOTUSBlog: Supreme Court supports tribal sovereignty over non-Indians<\/a> (June 3, 2021)<BR><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/06\/01\/supreme-court-backs-tribal-sovereignty-in-law-enforcement-case\/\" title=\"Supreme Court backs tribal sovereignty in law enforcement case\">Supreme Court backs tribal sovereignty in law enforcement case<\/a> (June 1, 2021)<BR><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/05\/17\/chuck-hoskin-cherokee-nation-seeks-to-strengthen-sovereignty\/\" title=\"Chuck Hoskin: Cherokee Nation seeks to strengthen sovereignty\">Chuck Hoskin: Cherokee Nation seeks to strengthen sovereignty<\/a> (May 17, 2021)<BR><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/04\/19\/indian-country-nearly-locked-out-of-u-s-supreme-court-hearing\/\" title=\"Indian Country nearly locked out of U.S. Supreme Court hearing\">Indian Country nearly locked out of U.S. Supreme Court hearing<\/a> (April 19, 2021)","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The nation\u2019s highest court is back in session amid COVID-19 and it\u2019s shaping up to be a busy one for tribes and their advocates.","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17086,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_vp_format_video_url":"","_vp_image_focal_point":[],"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[67,20,13,1,14],"tags":[2056,612,1527,2089,1475,5,101,75,73,138,2088,8,24,7,505,220,84,27,1526,106,755,2047],"class_list":["post-17053","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-indian-gaming","category-indian-trust","category-law","category-national","category-politics","tag-10th-circuit","tag-5th-circuit","tag-alabama-coushatta","tag-bingo","tag-class-ii","tag-coronavirus","tag-crime","tag-donald-trump","tag-igra","tag-meetings","tag-merle-denezpi","tag-narf","tag-navajo","tag-ncai","tag-nigc","tag-sovereignty","tag-supreme-court","tag-texas","tag-tigua","tag-tribal-courts","tag-uset","tag-ute-mountain-ute","no-wpautop"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/20\/SpeakingRockEntertainmentCenter-scaled.jpg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pcoJ7g-4r3","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17053","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17053"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17053\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17086"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17053"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17053"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17053"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}