{"id":12420,"date":"2021-06-04T13:48:02","date_gmt":"2021-06-04T17:48:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.indianz.com\/News\/?p=12420"},"modified":"2021-06-04T13:56:00","modified_gmt":"2021-06-04T17:56:00","slug":"cronkite-news-supreme-court-finally-got-it-right-on-tribal-sovereignty","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/06\/04\/cronkite-news-supreme-court-finally-got-it-right-on-tribal-sovereignty\/","title":{"rendered":"Cronkite News: Supreme Court finally &#8216;got it right&#8217; on tribal sovereignty"},"content":{"rendered":"<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"2560\" height=\"1920\" data-attachment-id=\"12422\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/06\/04\/cronkite-news-supreme-court-finally-got-it-right-on-tribal-sovereignty\/supremecourt-16\/\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/04\/supremecourt-scaled.jpg\" data-orig-size=\"2560,1920\" data-comments-opened=\"0\" data-image-title=\"supremecourt\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"&lt;p&gt;Photo by Indianz.Com &lt;a href=&quot;https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/&quot;&gt;(CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)&lt;\/a&gt;&lt;\/p&gt;\n\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/04\/supremecourt-1024x768.jpg\" src=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/04\/supremecourt-scaled.jpg\" alt=\"supremecourt\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-12422\" \/><figcaption class=\"figure-caption\">The U.S. Supreme Court. Photo by Indianz.Com <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-sa\/4.0\/\">(CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)<\/a><\/figcaption>\r\n<div class=\"h3-responsive font-weight-bold\">Tribal police can detain non-tribal suspects, Supreme Court rules<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"date\">Friday, June 4, 2021<\/div>\r\n<div class=\"byline\">By Brooke Newman<\/div>\r\n<DIV class=source>Cronkite News<\/DIV>\r\n<DIV class=source-website><A \r\nhref=\"https:\/\/cronkitenews.azpbs.org\/\">cronkitenews.azpbs.org<\/A><\/DIV>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nWASHINGTON &#8211; Tribal police have the authority to <a href=https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/06\/01\/supreme-court-backs-tribal-sovereignty-in-law-enforcement-case\/>detain non-Natives traveling through reservation land<\/a> if the officer has a reasonable belief that the suspect violated state or federal law, the Supreme Court ruled Tuesday.<p><\/p>\r\nThe <a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/01\/19-1414-syllabus.pdf\">unanimous ruling<\/a> overturned lower courts that said a Crow police officer should not have held a nontribal member who was found to have drugs and weapons in his truck. The Supreme Court said that the lower courts&#8217; rulings would &#8220;make it difficult for tribes to protect themselves against ongoing threats.&#8221;<span id=\"more-128753\"><\/span><p><\/p>\r\nCalls seeking comment Tuesday from Arizona tribes and tribal police agencies were not immediately returned. But advocates welcomed the ruling that one said addresses &#8220;a crucial issue of law enforcement and safety in Indian Country.&#8221;<p><\/p>\r\n&#8220;The Supreme Court got it right, and upheld tribal authority to do the bare minimum of what any police force should be able to do to protect their homeland and the public safety of members of the community,&#8221; said Heather Whiteman Runs Him, director of the Tribal Justice Center at the University of Arizona.<p><\/p>\r\n<div class=\" content_cards_card content_cards_domain_twitter-com\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"content_cards_image\">\n\t\t\t\t<a class=\"content_cards_image_link\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/indianz\/status\/1400537006481063936\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/19\/qwsf8fwm_200x200-16.jpg\" alt=\"indianz.com (@indianz) on X\">\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\n\t<div class=\"content_cards_title\">\n\t\t<a class=\"content_cards_title_link\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/indianz\/status\/1400537006481063936\">\n\t\t\tindianz.com (@indianz) on X\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n\t<div class=\"content_cards_description\">\n\t\t<a class=\"content_cards_description_link\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/indianz\/status\/1400537006481063936\">\n\t\t\t<p>ICYMI: The U.S. Supreme Court actually sided with tribal sovereignty for once! Learn more about the inherent power of tribes to stop and investigate non-Indians from attorney Elizabeth Reese. @yunpovi #SupremeCourt #TribalSovereignty #SCOTUSBlog https:\/\/t.co\/82rxsPclBK<\/p>\n\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n\t<div class=\"content_cards_site_name\">\n\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/favicon.ico\" alt=\"X (formerly Twitter)\" class=\"content_cards_favicon\"\/>\t\tX (formerly Twitter)\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\r\n<P><\/P>\r\nThe case began early on the morning of February 26, 2016, when Crow Police Department Officer James Saylor noticed a truck stopped on the side of U.S. Route 212 on reservation land in southern Montana. Saylor stopped, thinking the driver might need assistance.<p><\/p>\r\nAs Saylor approached the driver&#8217;s side of the truck, driver Joshua Cooley rolled down, then rolled back up, his window. When he rolled it down again at Saylor&#8217;s request, the officer noticed that Cooley, who &#8220;appeared to be non-native,&#8221; had &#8220;watery, bloodshot eyes.&#8221;<p><\/p>\r\nAfter he noticed two semi-automatic rifles on the front seat, Saylor asked Cooley to get out of the truck for a pat-down search and called for assistance from tribal and county officers. While waiting for them to arrive, Saylor returned to turn off the still-running truck and spotted a glass pipe and a bag containing methamphetamine, according to court documents.<p><\/p>\r\nWhen the other officers arrived, including a federal Bureau of Indian Affairs officer, they told Saylor to &#8220;seize any contraband in plain view,&#8221; which led to the discovery of more methamphetamine.<p><\/p>\r\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"100%\" height=\"400\" scrolling=\"no\" frameborder=\"no\" allow=\"autoplay\" src=\"https:\/\/w.soundcloud.com\/player\/?url=https%3A\/\/api.soundcloud.com\/tracks\/1014804295&#038;color=%23ff5500&#038;auto_play=false&#038;hide_related=false&#038;show_comments=true&#038;show_user=true&#038;show_reposts=false&#038;show_teaser=true&#038;visual=true\"><\/iframe>\r\n<figcaption class=\"figure-caption\">Indianz.Com Audio: <a href=https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/03\/24\/u-s-supreme-court-u-s-v-cooley\/>U.S. Supreme Court &#8211;  United States v. Joshua James Cooley &#8211; March 23, 2021<\/a>\r\n<\/figcaption>\r\n<P><\/p>\r\nCooley was indicted in federal district court on drug and gun charges, but moved to have the drug evidence suppressed. He argued that Saylor did not have the authority as a tribal police officer to investigate &#8220;nonapparent violations of state or federal law by a non-Indian on a public right-of-way crossing the reservation.&#8221;<p><\/p>\r\nThe district court agreed, and a panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals <a href=\"https:\/\/cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov\/datastore\/opinions\/2019\/03\/21\/17-30022.pdf\">upheld that ruling<\/a> in March 2019, noting that Saylor made no attempt to determine whether Cooley was a tribal member or not.<p><\/p>\r\nThe full 9th Circuit refused to reconsider the ruling, which one <a href=\"https:\/\/cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov\/datastore\/opinions\/2020\/01\/24\/17-30022.pdf\">dissenting judge<\/a> said would &#8220;blow \u2026 a gaping hole in tribal law enforcement.&#8221;<p><\/p>\r\nBut the Supreme Court said Tuesday that while its previous rulings support &#8220;the general proposition that the inherent sovereign powers of an Indian tribe do not extend to the activities of nonmembers of the tribe \u2026 it is not an absolute rule.&#8221;<p><\/p><div class=\"mt-1 mb-1\"><ins class=\"adsbygoogle\" style=\"display:block; text-align:center;\" data-ad-layout=\"in-article\" data-ad-format=\"fluid\" data-ad-client=\"ca-pub-8411603009680747\" data-ad-slot=\"6394965691\"><\/ins><script>(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});<\/script><\/div><p><\/p>\r\nJustice Stephen Breyer, who wrote the opinion for the unanimous court, noted that there are two exceptions to that rule, one of which &#8220;fit like a glove&#8221; in this case. Those are actions to protect the health or welfare of the tribe.<p><\/p>\r\n&#8220;To deny a tribal police officer authority to search and detain for a reasonable time any person he or she believes may commit or has committed a crime would make it difficult for tribes to protect themselves against ongoing threats,&#8221; Breyer wrote. &#8220;Such threats may be posed by, for instance, non-Indian drunk drivers, transporters of contraband, or other criminal offenders operating on roads within the boundaries of a tribal reservation.&#8221;<p><\/p>\r\nRobert Miller, a professor at Arizona State University&#8217;s Sandra Day O\u2019Connor College of Law, said the high court&#8217;s ruling is &#8220;important and welcomed.&#8221; He said it is the first time the court has interpreted the health and welfare exception to its limits on tribal sovereignty.<p><\/p>\r\n&#8220;This decision will be very popular among people who support Indian sovereignty,&#8221; Miller said. &#8220;Millions of non-Indians live on reservation land, so this is a crucial issue of law enforcement and safety in Indian Country.&#8221;<p><\/p>\r\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1433\" height=\"1019\" data-attachment-id=\"12425\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/06\/04\/cronkite-news-supreme-court-finally-got-it-right-on-tribal-sovereignty\/crowtribe-2\/\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/04\/crowtribe.jpg\" data-orig-size=\"1433,1019\" data-comments-opened=\"0\" data-image-title=\"crowtribe\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"&lt;p&gt;The flag of the Crow Tribe. Photo: Crow Tribe&lt;\/p&gt;\n\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/04\/crowtribe-1024x728.jpg\" src=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/04\/crowtribe.jpg\" alt=\"crowtribe\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-12425\" \/><figcaption class=\"figure-caption\">The flag of the Crow Tribe. Photo: Crow Tribe<\/figcaption>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\nWhiteman Runs Him, a member of the Crow Tribe, said there are typically only two to four officers to patrol the 2.5 million acre reservation, which has been hit hard by the methamphetamine epidemic. The court &#8220;applied common sense&#8221; in its ruling, which will put more tools in the hands of tribal police officers to fight drug and human trafficking, she said.<p><\/p>\r\n&#8220;The ability of law enforcement to respond to crises is really a matter of life and death to many tribal citizens and to many non-Indian citizens living on or traveling through the reservation,&#8221; Whiteman Runs Him said.<p><\/p>\r\n<STRONG>For more stories from Cronkite News, visit <A href=\"https:\/\/cronkitenews.azpbs.org\/?utm_source=referral&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=client\">cronkitenews.azpbs.org<\/A>.<\/STRONG>\r\n<P><\/p>\r\n<div class=\"h5-responsive sub\">U.S. Supreme Court Decision: U.S. v. Cooley<\/div>\r\n<a href=https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/01\/19-1414-syllabus.pdf>\r\nSyllabus<\/a> |\r\n<a href=https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/01\/19-1414-breyer.pdf>Opinion [Breyer]<\/a> |\r\n<a href=https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/01\/19-1414-alito.pdf>Concurrence [Alito]<\/a> |\r\n<a href=https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/01\/19-1414.pdf>Full Document<\/a>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<div class=\"h5-responsive sub\">Briefs: United States v. Cooley<\/div>\r\nHere are the briefs on the merits in support of tribal interests in <em>United States v. Cooley<\/em>.\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/04\/20210108153036386_19-1414tsUnitedStates.pdf\">Brief of Petitioner United States<\/a>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/04\/20210115140949495_19-1414-Amicus-Brief-of-NationalIndigenousWomensResourceCenter.pdf\" title=\"20210115140949495_19-1414 Amicus Brief of NationalIndigenousWomensResourceCenter\">Amicus Brief of National Indigenous Women\u2019s Resource Center <\/a>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/04\/20210114150531638_19-1414-Amici-BOM-Tribes.pdf\" title=\"20210114150531638_19-1414 Amici BOM Tribes\">Amicus Brief of the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, et al.<\/a>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/04\/20210114131213622_21.01.14-40493-pdf-Rasmussen-br.pdf\" title=\"20210114131213622_21.01.14 40493 pdf Rasmussen br\"> Amicus Brief of Ute Indian Tribe<\/a>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/04\/20210115124745975_Routel-Cooley-Brief.pdf\" title=\"20210115124745975_Routel Cooley Brief\">Amicus Brief of Indian Law and Policy Professors<\/a>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/04\/20210115140305751_Final-NCAI-Tribal-Governments-Amici-Brief-US-v-Cooley-1-15-21.pdf\" title=\"20210115140305751_Final NCAI-Tribal Governments Amici Brief-US v Cooley 1-15-21\">Amicus Brief of National Congress of American Indians, et al.<\/a>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/04\/20210115130013804_19-1414-tsac-Members-of-Congress.pdf\" title=\"20210115130013804_19-1414 tsac Members of Congress\">Amicus Brief of Current and Former Members of Congress<\/a>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/04\/20210115134044388_19-1414-tsac-Former-U.S.-Attorneys.pdf\" title=\"20210115134044388_19-1414 tsac Former U.S. Attorneys\">Amicus Brief of Former US Attorneys<\/a>\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/04\/20210115133631591_19-1414-tsac-The-Cayuga-Nation.pdf\" title=\"20210115133631591_19-1414 tsac The Cayuga Nation\">Amicus Brief of the Cayuga Nation, et al.<\/a>\r\n<P><\/p>\r\n<div class=\"h5-responsive sub\">9th Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions<\/div>\r\n<a href=https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/17-30022.pdf>United States v. Cooley [Panel Decision]<\/a> (March 21, 2019)<BR>\r\n<a href=https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/17-30022b.pdf>United States v. Cooley [Denial of En Banc]<\/a> (January 24, 2020)\r\n<p><\/p>\r\n<HR><EM>Note: This story originally <a href=\"https:\/\/cronkitenews.azpbs.org\/2021\/06\/01\/supreme-court-ruling-says-tribal-police-can-detain-non-tribal-suspects\/\">appeared on Cronkite News<\/a>.  It  is published via a <A href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/\">Creative  Commons license<\/A>. Cronkite News is produced by the <A href=\"https:\/\/cronkite.asu.edu\/\">Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication<\/A> at <A href=\"https:\/\/www.asu.edu\">Arizona State University<\/A>.<\/EM><HR>\r\n<P><\/P>\r\n<div class=\"h4-responsive\">Related Stories<\/div>\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/06\/03\/scotusblog-supreme-court-supports-tribal-sovereignty-over-non-indians\/\" title=\"SCOTUSBlog: Supreme Court supports tribal sovereignty over non-Indians\">SCOTUSBlog: Supreme Court supports tribal sovereignty over non-Indians<\/a> (June 3, 2021)<BR><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/06\/01\/supreme-court-backs-tribal-sovereignty-in-law-enforcement-case\/\" title=\"Supreme Court backs tribal sovereignty in law enforcement case\">Supreme Court backs tribal sovereignty in law enforcement case<\/a> (June 1, 2021)<BR>\r\n<a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/03\/24\/endangers-everyone-on-indian-reservations-supreme-court-urged-to-respect-tribal-sovereignty\/\" title=\"\u2018Endangers everyone on Indian reservations\u2019: Supreme Court urged to respect tribal sovereignty\">\u2018Endangers everyone on Indian reservations\u2019: Supreme Court urged to respect tribal sovereignty<\/a> (March 24, 2021)<BR><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/03\/24\/u-s-supreme-court-u-s-v-cooley\/\" title=\"U.S. Supreme Court: United States v. Joshua James Cooley\">U.S. Supreme Court: United States v. Joshua James Cooley<\/a> (March 24, 2021)<BR><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/03\/22\/scotusblog-supreme-court-takes-up-messy-tribal-sovereignty-case\/\" title=\"SCOTUSBlog: Supreme Court takes up messy tribal sovereignty case\">SCOTUSBlog: Supreme Court takes up messy tribal sovereignty case<\/a> (March 22, 2021)<BR><a href=\"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/2021\/02\/04\/u-s-supreme-court-sets-oral-argument-in-bad-men-treaty-right-case\/\" title=\"U.S. Supreme Court sets oral argument in \u2018bad men\u2019 treaty rights case\">U.S. Supreme Court sets oral argument in \u2018bad men\u2019 treaty rights case<\/a> (February 4, 2021)","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Tribal police have the authority to detain non-Indians traveling through reservations if the officer has a reasonable belief that the suspect violated state or federal law, the Supreme Court ruled.","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":12425,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_vp_format_video_url":"","_vp_image_focal_point":[],"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[20,13,1],"tags":[42,117,46,354,1639,511,249,47,1640,220,1331,84],"class_list":["post-12420","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-indian-trust","category-law","category-national","tag-arizona","tag-bia","tag-cronkite-news","tag-crow","tag-heather-whiteman-runs-him","tag-law-enforcement","tag-montana","tag-race","tag-robert-miller","tag-sovereignty","tag-stephen-breyer","tag-supreme-court","no-wpautop"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/04\/crowtribe.jpg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pcoJ7g-3ek","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12420","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12420"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12420\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12425"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12420"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12420"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/indianz.com\/News\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12420"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}