Indianz.Com > News > Department of Justice holds tribal consultations on U.S. Supreme Court decision
U.S. Supreme Court
The U.S. Supreme Court is seen on the evening of January 7, 2025, as crowds pay their respects to the late former U.S. president Jimmy Carter, who died on December 29, 2024, at the age of 100. Photo by Indianz.Com (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
Department of Justice holds tribal consultations on U.S. Supreme Court decision
Tuesday, January 7, 2025
Indianz.Com

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is kicking off a series of consultation sessions to address a U.S. Supreme Court decision seen as detrimental to tribal sovereignty.

In June 2022, the Supreme Court held that states can prosecute crimes in Indian Country despite a lack of tribal consent and a lack of Congressional authorization. The decision in Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, which was reached by a vote of 5 to 4, upset more than a century of settled policy and practice.

As a result, DOJ is considering whether to support legislation that would address Castro-Huerta. Tribes are being asked to provide their views at consultation sessions on January 10, February 5 and February 6.

“Congress, exercising its plenary power over Indian affairs, could address this decision by legislation,” a Dear Tribal Leader Letter, dated January 3, reads. “Unless Congress acts, however, many States may now generally exercise jurisdiction to prosecute crimes committed by non-Indians against Indians in Indian country without any authorization from Congress or any consent from the governing Tribal nations.”

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE TRIBAL CONSULTATION ON POSSIBLE LEGISLATION TO ADDRESS THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISION IN OKLAHOMA V. CASTRO-HUERTA

A framing paper attached to the Dear Tribal Leader Letter includes two possible proposals to address Castro-Huerta. One was drafted by DOJ while the other was drafted by the National Congress of American Indians.

“Both proposals in Appendix A make clear that States lack jurisdiction over crimes within Indian country committed by or against Indians, unless expressly authorized by federal statute,” the framing paper reads.

The tribal consultations are being held virtually, with the first session being rescheduled to account for the National Day of Mourning in honor of the late former U.S president Jimmy Carter. Written comments can also be submitted by to the Office of Tribal Justice at DOJ by March 6.

The sessions come amid the change in the presidential administration, with Donald Trump, a Republican, taking office on January 20. He has announced Pam Bondi, a former attorney general of Florida, as his pick to lead DOJ.

“For too long, the partisan Department of Justice has been weaponized against me and other Republicans – Not anymore,” president-elect Trump said in a November 21 announcement that highlighted drug trafficking as an issue.

“Pam will refocus the DOJ to its intended purpose of fighting Crime, and Making America Safe Again,” Trump said.

Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta resulted from efforts by the state of Oklahoma to weaken tribal rights following the Supreme Court’s historic decision in a case known as McGirt. The Republican governor of Oklahoma, Kevin Stitt, has portrayed McGirt as favorable to criminals in Indian Country despite a lack of substantial evidence.

From the Trail of Tears to a temper tantrum, Native author explores long fight for justice on tribal lands
From the Trail of Tears to a temper tantrum, Native author explores long fight for justice on tribal lands

With her debut book, award-winning journalist Rebecca Nagle is taking a look at one of the most consequential U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Indian Country.
Indianz.Com Indianz.Com
Search
Filed Under
Tags
More Headlines
VIDEO: H.R.3073, the Shivwits Band of Paiutes Jurisdictional Clarity Act
AUDIO: H.R.3073, the Shivwits Band of Paiutes Jurisdictional Clarity Act
Native America Calling: Re-enactors help bring Native American perspective of the Revolutionary War to life
VIDEO: American Indian and Alaska Native Public Witness Hearing Day 2, Afternoon Session
VIDEO: American Indian and Alaska Native Public Witness Hearing Day 2, Morning Session
VIDEO: American Indian and Alaska Native Public Witness Hearing Day 1, Afternoon Session
VIDEO: American Indian and Alaska Native Public Witness Hearing Day 1, Morning Session
NAFOA: 5 Things You Need to Know This Week (March 16, 2026)
Tom Cole: Americans are feeling the impact of a government shutdown
Chuck Hoskin: Cherokee Nation studies impacts of data centers
Native America Calling: What’s in a (tribe’s) name?
Native America Calling: A John Wayne treasure or disaster?
‘These are treaty and trust responsibilities’: Lawmakers struggle with tribal water rights
Native America Calling: Confronting forced sterilization of Native women
VIDEO: Examining Federal Policies Governing Indian Water Rights Settlements and S.953, Northeastern Arizona Indian Water Rights Settlement Act
More Headlines