This case involves the 2010 compact between the tribe and the state. As part of that agreement, the Seminoles were granted exclusive rights to offer banked card games for a five-year period, in exchange for $1 billion to the state. The deal contained penalties if the state violated the tribe’s exclusivity, giving the public assurance that the compact would actually halt further expansion of gambling.
In 2011, Florida regulators allowed pari-mutuels to offer so-called “designated-player’’ card games, a new game that – unlike traditional poker – features players trying to get a better hand than a designated player, who then pays out winners and collects from losers.
While these games are certainly lucrative for the pari-mutuel owners, the state realizes little revenue from their play versus what is at risk by violating the compact. The FY 2014-2015 annual report from the Department of Pari-Mutuel Wagering shows that combined revenue to the state from all licensed card rooms was $14.3 million. In contrast, the minimum payment from the tribe to the state that year was $234 million.
Why regulators would take this risk is baffling. Here is what is more baffling – these games appear to violate state law.
Read More on the Story:
Paul Seago:
State busts in legal showdown with Seminole Tribe
(The Tallahassee Democrat 11/29)
Related Stories:
Seminole
Tribe wins big decision in gaming dispute with Florida (11/10)
Peter
d'Errico: Seminole Tribe embraces limits on sovereignty (10/24)
Seminole
Tribe accuses state of bad faith in gaming compact talks (10/03)
Donald
Trump hired firm to lobby for tribal casino deal in Florida (09/29)
Seminole
Tribe seeks decision in Class III gaming compact case (06/07)
Seminole
Tribe starts work on scaled back casino expansion plan (6/1)
Seminole
Tribe still going strong despite lack of new casino deal (05/24)
Seminole
Tribe drops motion after gaming revenues published (05/13)
Seminole
Tribe seeks court order to protect gaming information (5/12)
Florida
racks up legal bills in gaming fight with Seminole Tribe (04/29)
Judge
agrees to delay trial in Seminole Tribe's compact lawsuit (03/29)
Editorial:
Courts hold the cards on Seminole Tribe's casino deal (03/24)
Seminole
Tribe turns attention to courts after casino deal falters (3/23)
Seminole
Tribe seeks delay in Class III gaming compact litigation (03/10)
Editorial: A
'shameful' delay on Seminole Tribe gaming compact (3/3)
Seminole
Tribe faces setback for new Class III gaming compact (3/2)
Seminole
Tribe wins ruling in employment case due to immunity (02/25)
Seminole
Tribe's gaming compact takes a step forward in Florida (02/10)
Seminole
Tribe plans $1.8B in gaming projects with new compact (02/01)
Seminole
Tribe runs ad touting $3B in revenues in casino compact (01/27)
Seminole
Tribe finally gets response to gaming compact lawsuit (1/26)