The Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe has been allowed to intervene in a lawsuit filed by casino opponents in Massachusetts.
The tribe has a "undeniable and compelling interest" in the outcome of the case, Judge William G. Young wrote in an order on Friday. At stake is the future of its homeland and the First Light Resort and Casino, its long-delayed gaming project.
“This is an important legal victory,” Chairman Cedric Cromwell told The Cape Cod Times. “It allows us to directly participate in the case.”
On July 28, Young ruled that the Bureau of Indian Affairs should not have approved the land-into-trust application for the casino site. Opponents successfully argued that the tribe cannot follow the land-into-trust process because it was not "under federal jurisdiction" in 1934 and was not "recognized" in 1934.
The Obama administration has sought a reconsideration or clarification of the ruling but Young has not acted on the request. Regardless, the tribe will be able to defend its interests on the land-into-trust issue as the case goes forward.
The tribe broke ground on the casino in April but work is in limbo as a result of the ruling.
Read More on the Story:
Mashpee tribe given voice in land trust suit
(The Cape Cod Times 9/28)
Tribe Earns A Seat In Lawsuit
(Cape News 9/28)
Court Decisions:
District
Court of Massachusetts: Littlefield v. Department of the Interior (July 28,
2016)
D.C.
Circuit Court of Appeals: Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of
Oregon v. Jewell (July 29, 2016)
Supreme Court Decision in Carcieri v. Salazar:
Syllabus
| Opinion
[Thomas] | Concurrence
[Breyer] | Dissent
[Stevens] | Concurrence/Dissent
[Souter]
Department of the Interior Solicitor Opinion:
M-37029: The
Meaning of "Under Federal Jurisdiction" for Purposes of the Indian
Reorganization Act (March 12, 2014)
Related Stories:
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe in limbo after decision on casino site (09/13)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe awaits word on role in casino lawsuit (08/31)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe hails bid to reconsider casino ruling (08/25)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe in high stakes fight for casino and land (08/22)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe files motion to join casino land dispute (8/16)
Opinion:
Court decisions appear in conflict on tribal gaming rights (8/15)
Indian
law experts debate outcomes in two land-into-trust cases (8/4)
Two
tribes see conflicting rulings in long-running quests for casinos (8/2)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe continues work on casino despite ruling (8/1)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe sees setback in land-into-trust dispute (7/29)
Obama
administration backs Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe casino bid (07/08)
Judge
focuses on Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe casino decision (06/30)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe casino foes lose big source of funding (6/28)
Judge
schedules trial in Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe casino case (6/21)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe not worried about anti-casino lawsuit (05/31)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe sees large turnout for casino job fair (05/16)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe invites all to casino job and vendor fair (5/10)
Mashpee
Wampanaog Tribe overcomes hurdles with casino plan (5/2)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe welcomes rejection of rival casino bid (4/28)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe disputes rival's casino market study (4/26)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe awaits decision on rival casino plan (4/20)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe to host job and vendor fair for casino (04/13)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe moves full steam ahead with casino (4/12)