A federal judge has agreed to determine whether the Bureau of Indian Affairs can place land into trust for the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe of Massachusetts.
Judge William G. Young will hear arguments on July 11, according to a court order filed on Wednesday. The proceeding will solely be limited to one issue -- whether the tribe qualifies for the land-into-trust provisions of Indian Reorganization Act of 1934.
The BIA determined that the Mashpees could take advantage of the law because their ancestors were "Indian" and were living on a "reservation" in 1934. The novel interpretation of the IRA appears to be the first of its kind for a newly-recognized tribe.
Casino opponents are hoping to convince the judge that the BIA is wrong.
According to the first cause of action in their complaint, the tribe was not "under federal jurisdiction" in 1934 -- a requirement imposed by the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Carcieri v.
Salazar.
Opponents also raised other claims but they agreed to focus solely on their first cause of action as part of a stipulation they jointly filed with the federal government on Tuesday. Young accepted the limited approach and ordered the parties to submit briefs by July 7.
Whatever the outcome, a decision in the case might not have an effect on the First Light Resort and
Casino, which is due to open in the summer of 2017. The tribe is not named as a defendant in the lawsuit and cannot be added without its consent due to sovereign immunity.
If the casino site somehow is deemed to be out of trust, officials in Massachusetts might be pressured to take action. But options are limited as a result of the Supreme Court's decision in Michigan
v. Bay Mills Indian Community.
In May 2014, the court determined that tribes can be sued by states but only for activities that occur on "Indian lands" -- a definition that would no longer hold true if the BIA loses the case. Otherwise, the tribe retains its sovereign immunity.
Get the Story:
Judge narrows focus of suit brought by casino foes
(The Cape Cod Times 6/30)
$P Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe Land-Into-Trust Documents:
Chairman
Cedric Cromwell Announcement | Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe Press
Release | Bureau of
Indian Affairs Press Release | Assistant
Secretary Kevin Washburn Letter to Chairman Cedric Cromwell | Record
of Decision
DOI Solicitor Opinion:
M-37029: The
Meaning of "Under Federal Jurisdiction" for Purposes of the Indian
Reorganization Act (March 12, 2014)
Related Stories:
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe casino foes lose big source of funding (6/28)
Judge
schedules trial in Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe casino case (6/21)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe not worried about anti-casino lawsuit (05/31)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe sees large turnout for casino job fair (05/16)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe invites all to casino job and vendor fair (5/10)
Mashpee
Wampanaog Tribe overcomes hurdles with casino plan (5/2)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe welcomes rejection of rival casino bid (4/28)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe disputes rival's casino market study (4/26)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe awaits decision on rival casino plan (4/20)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe to host job and vendor fair for casino (04/13)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe moves full steam ahead with casino (4/12)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe confirms groundbreaking for casino (3/30)
Rival casino
opposed by Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe awaits fate (3/29)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe and rival spar over potential casino (3/25)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe responds to doubts on gaming plan (3/22)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe awaits word on rival casino project (3/18)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe not worried about casino site lawsuit (3/17)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe leaves casino operation to big firm (3/16)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe announces opening of casino in 2017 (3/15)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe foes confident as casino moves forward (3/9)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe to break ground on long-awaited casino (3/8)
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe presses state to reject rival casino (3/3)
Non-Indian
billionaire slams Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe casino (3/2)