The Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma and its leaders are seeking the dismissal of a gaming lawsuit filed by the state of Kansas.
The state initially sued the National Indian Gaming Commission after the agency confirmed that the tribe's land in Kansas can be used to expand the Downstream Casino Resort. Attorney General Derek Schmidt amended the complaint to include the tribe and its leaders and officials.
But the tribe argues that it can't be sued due to sovereign immunity. The other defendants, including Chairman John Berrey, are also protected by immunity, attorneys said in a court filing.
"Congress has set forth a comprehensive structure for the regulation of gaming on Indian lands, which does not include granting states the authority to enjoin tribal gaming activities on Indian lands where no tribal-state compact is present and where no class III gaming is underway," the motion to dismiss states.
As the filing notes, the tribe lacks a Class III gaming compact with Kansas. Such an agreement might include a limited waiver of immunity for activities that occur on Indian lands, as that term is defined by the Indian
Gaming Regulatory Act, but Gov. Sam Brownback (R) refuses to negotiate.
Tribes can be sued under IGRA for Class III gaming activities that occur on Indian lands, the U.S. Supreme Court observed in Michigan
v. Bay Mills Indian Community, a sovereign immunity case from 2014.
However, as the motion points out, the Quapaws are not conducting Class III gaming on the Kansas property -- it's currently being used for a parking lot.
"On the Kansas Trust Land are located the main parking lots for the Downstream Casino Resort, as well as other ancillary facilities and infrastructure for the resort," the tribe's attorneys told the court. "The same facilities were located on this tract when it was taken into trust by the Secretary of the Interior in 2012, and there has been no change in the use of that tract since that date."
In the event the tribe moves forward with the casino expansion without the state's support or without a compact, Class II gaming could occur there. States do not have a role in Class II gaming.
The NIGC is also seeking to dismiss the lawsuit. Government attorneys argue that the Indian lands opinion for the tribe does not constitute a "final agency action" that can be challenged in court.
Generally, IGRA bars casinos on land acquired after 1988. The Bureau of Indian Affairs placed the
Kansas property in trust in 2012.
But Section 20 of the law contains several exceptions. The NIGC
determined that the property falls within the tribe's former reservation outside
of Oklahoma.
Get the Story:
Quapaw Tribe Seeks Dismissal Of Lawsuit Over Casino Plans
(AP 6/16)
Quapaw Tribe asks federal judge to dismiss Kansas lawsuit blocking casino development
(The Miami News-Record 6/16)
$P Relevant Documents:
NIGC
Indian Land Opinion For Site in Kansas (November 2014)
Related Stories:
Kansas
seeks more time to respond in Quapaw Tribe casino case (6/5)
NIGC seeks
dismissal of suit over Quapaw Tribe casino expansion (6/3)
John Berrey:
Governor in Kansas turns back on Quapaw Tribe (5/19)
Kansas seeks
injunction to stop Quapaw Tribe gaming expansion (4/17)
Quapaw
Tribe promises fight to protect casino rights in Kansas (03/19)
Kansas
sues over gaming land determination for Quapaw Tribe (03/10)
Quapaw
Tribe proposes $110M 'Emerald City' casino in Kansas (02/24)
Quapaw
Tribe slams casino expansion opposition as 'anti-Indian' (02/11)
County
opposes expansion of Quapaw Tribe casino into Kansas (02/10)
Kansas
attorney general questions Quapaw Tribe's gaming plans (12/10)
Quapaw
Tribe to expand gaming facility into ancestral territory (12/05)