The North Fork Rancheria
of Mono Indians is being heavily outspent by rival tribes who want to block an off-reservation casino in northern California.
According to BallotPedia's report on Proposition
48, opponents have raised $8.9 million as of October 7.
In contrast, the North Fork Rancheria has raised barely $392,000.
“It’s really David versus Goliath,’’ North Fork spokesperson Charles Altekruse told The Los Angeles Times. “California voters have supported indian gaming repeatedly. They did it to help tribes, and they did it to provide tribal self reliance and tribal opportunity.”
The opponents include the
Table
Mountain Rancheria, the Picayune Rancheria of the
Chukchansi Indians and the United Auburn Indian
Community.
The Table
Mountain Rancheria and the Picayune Rancheria operate casinos that would be affected by the North Fork operation.
A "yes" vote on Proposition 48 ratifies the North Fork Rancheria's Class III
gaming compact. It also ratifies a compact for the Wiyot Tribe, whose leaders agreed to
forgo a casino in exchange for a cut of revenues from the North Fork casino.
A "no" vote, on the other hand, blocks the compact. A description of
Proposition 48, from the California
Secretary of State, follows:
Proposition 48 - Referendum to Overturn Indian Gaming Compacts
Get the Story:
If
signed by the required number of registered voters and timely filed with the
Secretary of State, this petition will place on the statewide ballot a challenge
to a state law previously approved by the Legislature and the Governor. The law
must then be approved by a majority of voters at the next statewide election to
go into effect. The law ratifies two gaming compacts (with the North Fork
Rancheria of Mono Indians, and the Wiyot Tribe); and it exempts execution of the
compacts, certain projects, and intergovernmental agreements from the California
Environmental Quality Act. (13-0007)
Opponents hold financial edge battle over tribal casino ballot initiative
(The Los Angeles Times 10/8)
$P California Court of Appeal Decision:
Picayune
Rancheria v. Brown (September 24, 2014)
Bureau of Indian Affairs Documents:
Press
Release | Fact
Sheet: North Fork Rancheria Decision | Section
20 Determination: North Fork Rancheria
Related Stories:
CPR: North
Fork Rancheria off-reservation casino faces voter test (10/6)
Tribe against tribe in off-reservation
casino dispute in California (10/3)