FROM THE ARCHIVE
Towns oppose Ojibwe casino
Facebook Twitter Email
SEPTEMBER 6, 2000

Three Connecticut towns are not only opposing local efforts to expand reservations but also a proposal by three Ojibwe tribes to take land into trust in Wisconsin.

The towns submitted a letter to the Bureau of Indian Affairs as part of a 30-day comment period on a casino proposed by the Red Cliff, Sokaogon, and Lac Courte Oreilles Ojibwe in Hudson, Wisconsin. The towns say the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) of 1988 only allows reservation expansion onto lands which directly border existing borders.

The 30-day comment period ended last week. The Department of Interior said it would only consider comments addressing the environmental impact of the casino.

The towns are also opposing the expansion of the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation. A ruling over the Department of Interior's decision to take 165 acres of land into trust for the tribe is pending in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

Get the Story:
Three towns appeal to BIA again in tribal recognition cases (The New London Day 9/6)

Related Stories:
Survey shows opposition to casino (Money Matters 8/31)
City wants more casino study (Money Matters 8/31)
Congressman named in casino report (Money Matters 8/31) Ojibwe comment period ends (Money Matters 8/30)
Casinos a test for Wisconsin (Money Matters 08/28)
Babbitt casino report released (Money Matters 08/23)
Group opposes casino (Money Matters 08/16)
Ojibwe comment period begins (Money Matters 08/01)
Ojibwe leader walks out of casino hearing (Money Matters 07/25)
Tribes fight casino (Money Matters 07/24)
Tribe suing DOI over casino (Tribal Law 7/18)
Casino foes present petition (Money Matters 07/14)
Leaders may support casino (Money Matters 06/21)
Tribe can't interfere with casino (Tribal Law 06/08)
Tribes, city reach agreement (Money Matters 05/31)