Facebook Twitter Email
TUESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2003

Not all municipalities in Connecticut are backing an anti-casino effort, The Norwich Bulletin reports.

Cities and towns are being asked to sign a resolution to oppose expanded gaming. But some say they aren't impacted by casinos and question the anti-tribal effort.

Opponents of tribes are fighting the federal recognition of the Eastern Pequots and helped repeal a state law that paved the way for Indian gaming.

Get the Story:
Not everyone's aboard the casino ban bandwagon (The Norwich Bulletin 1/21)

Related Stories:
Editorial: It's not racist to stop tribes (01/10)
Tribes: Racism behind casino law repeal (1/8)
Lawmakers vote to repeal casino law (1/7)
Conn. vote on casino law delayed (12/19)
Conn. anti-casino campaign in doubt (12/18)
Bill would terminate state tribes (12/11)
Conn. hearing focuses on casino law (12/10)
GOPs leading charge against tribes (12/02)
Conn. casino law targeted by GOPs (11/26)
Conn. lawmakers hope to stop new casinos (11/21)
Anti-casino group seeks change in law (10/25)
Repeal of casino law considered (10/04)
Blumenthal rebuffed on casino repeal (10/3)
Poll shows opposition to Conn. casino (10/3)
'Attack' on state tribes stalled (5/09)
Pequot chairman opposes casino bill (5/1)
Hearing held on Conn. gaming law (3/5)
Bill seeks to ban future casinos (3/1)
Here comes Joe Lieberman! (2/21)
Another brilliant offering in Conn. (2/21)