10th Circuit rejects Navajo court jurisdiction
Friday, July 20, 2007
Filed Under:
Law
The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday refused to enforce a Navajo Nation court decision, citing the tribe's lack of jurisdiction in a long-running employment dispute.
The state of Utah operated a state-owned health clinic within the boundaries of the Navajo Nation. Employees of the clinic sued in tribal court over alleged discrimination and other health care issues.
A Navajo judge ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. But when they tried to enforce the decision, a federal judge said the tribal court lacked jurisdiction.
An appeal to the 10th Circuit led to a reconsideration by the federal judge, who determined that the tribal court had jurisdiction over some of the Utah defendants but lacked jurisdiction against others.
A second trip to the appeals court resulted in Wednesday's ruling, which said the Navajo Nation cannot hear any of the claims because they don't impact tribal self-governance.
Get the Story:
Appeals court backs state in clinic dispute
(The Salt Lake Tribune 7/20)
Court Decision:
MacArthur v. San Juan County (July 18, 2007)
Related Stories:
Appeals court upholds
tribal verdict in bank loan case (06/28)
Navajo jurisdiction dispute
back in court (5/10)
9th Circuit vacates
tribal jurisdiction ruling (2/2)
Court
subjects non-Indian bank to tribal laws (7/20)
Appeals court upholds tribal jurisdiction after
rehearing (01/11)
Judge rules in
jurisdiction dispute over clinic (11/7)
Federal courts try to decide who is legally
Indian (08/24)
Appeals court to rehear
tribal jurisdiction case (06/08)
Judge
denies tribal jurisdiction over Indian descendant (12/08)
Appeals court rules against tribal jurisdiction
(08/09)
Tribal authority over all Indians
still unsettled question (06/23)
Supreme
Court affirms tribal powers over all Indians (04/20)
Supreme Court hears tribal powers case
(01/22)
Supreme Court case on
jurisdiction attracts attention (01/08)
Copyright © Indianz.Com
Subscribe